بررسی خصوصیات رشد و عملکرد گلرنگ در کشت مخلوط با عدس تحت شرایط مدیریت علف‌های‌هرز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 زراعت و اصلاح نباتات.گرایش اگرو تکنولوژی و فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی. دانشگاه ایلام

2 گروه زراعت و اصالح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران

3 استاد مدعو گروه زراعت و اصالح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
اهداف: یکی از راه‌های به سمت کشاورزی پایدار افزایش تنوع در بوم نظام‌های کشاورزی با استفاده از کشت مخلوط گیاهان زراعی است. این پژوهش با هدف کنترل و مدیریت علف‌های‌هرز، ارزیابی خصوصیات رشد و عملکرد گلرنگ در کشت مخلوط با عدس اجرا شده است.
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش به‌صورت کرت‌های خرد شده در قالب طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ایلام در سال زراعی 99-1398 اجرا شد. کرت‌های اصلی شامل کنترل علف‌های‌هرز در دو سطح (کنترل و عدم کنترل علف‌های‌هرز) و کرت‌های فرعی شامل الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط (کشت خالص گلرنگ، کشت خالص عدس، کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100 درصد گلرنگ+ 25 درصد عدس، 100 درصد گلرنگ+ 50 درصد عدس، 100 درصد گلرنگ+ 75 درصد عدس، 100 درصد گلرنگ+100 درصد عدس و الگوی کشت جایگزینی 50 درصد گلرنگ+50 درصد عدس) بودند.
نتایج: نتایج نشان داد کمترین تعداد گونه (به‌ترتیب 3/5 و 2/6 گونه در مترمربع)، تراکم (به‌ترتیب 32 و 26 بوته در مترمربع) و ماده خشک علف‌های‌هرز (به‌ترتیب 2/64 و 6/76 گرم در مترمربع) در الگوی کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100 درصد گلرنگ+ 75 درصد عدس و 100 درصد گلرنگ+ 100 عدس به‌دست آمد. کشت خالص گلرنگ و عدس بیشترین تراکم و ماده خشک علف‌های‌هرز را به خود اختصاص دادند. بیشترین میزان کارایی مصرف نور در گلرنگ و عدس (به‌ترتیب 44/4 و 67/4 مگاژول برمترمربع) در کشت مخلوط افزایشی 100 درصد گلرنگ +100 درصد عدس تحت شرایط کنترل علف‌های‌هرز به‌دست آمد.


واژه‌های کلیدی: الگوی کاشت، عدس، علف‌هرز، کارایی مصرف نور، گلرنگ.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of growth characteristics and yield of safflower in intercropping with lentils under weed management conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • zahra ahmadizad 1
  • Nosratolah Abbasi 2
  • Somayeh Hajinia 3
1 دانشجو
2 Ilam University
3 ilam university
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Objectives: One of the ways to sustainable agriculture is to increase the diversity in the ecosystem of agricultural systems by using intercropping of crops. The aim of this study was to control and manage weeds, evaluate the growth characteristics and yield of safflower mixed with lentils.
Materials and Methods: The experiment was conducted in the form of split plots in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, in the 2019-2020. Main plots include weed control at two levels (weed control and non-weed control) and sub-plots include different intercropping patterns (monoculture safflower, monoculture lentil, additive intercropping 100% safflower + 25% lentils, 100% safflower + 50% lentils, 100% safflower + 75% lentils, 100% safflower + 100% lentils and replacement pattern 50% safflower + 50% lentils).
Results: The results showed the lowest number of species (3.5 and 6.2 species per m2, respectively), density (32 and 26 plants per m2, respectively) and weed dry matter (64.2 and 76.6 g m-2, respectively) in additive intercropping 100% safflower + 75% lentils and 100% safflower + 100 lentils. Monoculture safflower and lentils had the highest density and dry matter of weeds. The highest radiation use efficiency in safflower and lentils (4.44 and 4.67 mj m-2, respectively) was obtained in the additive intercropping 100% safflower + 100% lentils under weed control conditions.
Keywords: Planting pattern, Lentils, weeds, Radiation use efficiency, Safflower.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Planting pattern
  • Lentils
  • weeds
  • Radiation use efficiency
  • Safflower

مراجع

Abdali Mashhadi A. 2006. The study of corn and sunflower intercropping in various rations and planting times. MSc. Dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Akunda EM. 2004. Improving food production by understanding the effects of intercropping and plant population on Soybean nitrogen fixing attributes. Journal of Food Technology in Africa, 6(4): 110-115.
Ariel C E, Eduardo OA, Benito GE, and Lidia G. (2013). Effects of two plant arrangements in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) intercropping on soil nitrogen and phosphorus status and growth of component crops at an Argentinean Argiudoll. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 1(2): 22-31.
Bagheri H, Andalibi B, and Azimi-Moghaddam R. (2012). Effect of atrazine anti transpiration application on improving physiological traits, yield and yield components of safflower under rain fed condition. Journal of Crops Improvement, 14(2): 1-16. (In Persian).
Campiglia E, Mancinelli R, Radicetti E, and Baresel JP. 2014. Evaluating spatial arrangement for durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and subclover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 169: 49-57.
Corre-Hellou G, Dibet A, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Crozat Y, Gooding M, Ambus P, & Jensen ES. 2011. The competitive ability of pea–barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Research, 122(3): 264-272.
Dahmardeh M, and Keshtegar A. 2014. Evaluating yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) in intercropping with peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal Agricultural Ecological, 6(2): 311-323.
Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, and Dordas CA. 2007. Competition indices of vetch and cereal intercrops in two ratio. Field Crops Research, 100: 249-256.
Esmaeilian Y, and Amiri, MB. 2021. Agronomic and economic evaluation of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) intercropping under micronutrient applications. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 15(57): 1-20. (In Persian).
Goudriaan J, and Van Laar HH. 1994. Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes. Kluwer Academic Press, 168 pp.
Hamzei J, Seyedi M, Ahmadvand G, and Abutalebian MA. 2012. The effect of additive intercropping on weed suppression, yield and yield component of chickpea and barley. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(3): 43-56. (In Persian)
Jonathan DC. (2008). Intercropping with maize in sub-arid regions. Community planting and Analysis Definition and benefits of intercropping. Technical Brief. April, 16.
Khan MR, Khan A, Wahab A, and Rashid A. 2005. Yield and yield components of wheat as influenced by intercropping of chickpea, lentil and rapeseed in different proportions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 42(3): 1-3.
Klindt Andersen MH, Hauggaard-Nielsen J, Weiner A, and Steen Jensen E. 2007. Competitive dynamics in two- and three-component intercrops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44: 545-551.
Köpke U, & Nemecek T. 2010. Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crops Research, 115(3): 217-233.
Kubota A, Safina, SA, Shebl SM, Mohamed AEA, Ishikawa N, Shimizu K, Abdel Ghawad K, & Maruyama S. 2015. Evaluation of intercropping system of maize and leguminous crops in the Nile Delta of Egypt. Tropical Agriculture and Development, 59(1): 14-19.
Mahfouz H, and Migawer, EA. 2004. Effect of intercropping, weed control treatment and their interaction on yield and its attributes of chickpea and canola. Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences, 19(4): 84-101.
Manjith Kumar BR, Chidenand M, Mansur PM, and Salimath S.C. 2009. Influence of different row proportions on yield components and yield of rabi crops under different intercropping systems. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(5): 1087-1089.
Mansori A. 2009. Evaluate of corn and soybean intercroppiing in various planting dates. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 3(1): 209-216.
Mansouri M, Jamshidi K, Rastgoo M, and Saba J. 2013. H MansouriThe effect of additive Maize-bean intercropping on yield, yield components and weeds control in Zanjan climate conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(3), 31-43. (In Persian).
Mikic A, Cupina B, Rubiales D, Mihailovic V, Sarunaite L, Fustec J, Antanasovic S, Krstic D, Bedoussac L, Zoric L, Dordevic V, Peric V, & Srebric M. 2015. Models, developments, and perspectives of mutual legume intercropping. In Advances in Agronomy, 130: 337-419.
Mobasser HR, Vazirimehr MR, & Rigi K. 2014. Effect of intercropping on resources use, weed management and forage quality. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4: 706-713.
Moradi R, Koocheki AR, and Nasiri Mahallati M. 2017. Evaluation of economical yield and radiation use efficiency of maize and cotton in sole and intercropping systems as affected by different levels of nitrogen. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 7(2): 47-59. (In Persian).
Ronald M, and Charles K. 2012. Weed suppression and component crops response in maize/pumpkin intercropping systems in Zimbabwe. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(7): 231-236.
Ruhlemann L, & Schmidtke K. (2015). Evaluation of monocropped and intercropped grain legumes for cover cropping in no-tillage and reduced tillage organic agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 65: 83-94.
Samarajeewa KBDP, Takatsugu H, and Shinyo O. 2006. Finger millet (Eleucine crocanal L. Gearth) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yield of soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 90: 93-99.
Singh Rajesh K, Kumar H, and Singh Amitesh K. 2010. Brassica based intercropping systems. A Review Agriculture Sciences, 31: 6-11.
Soleimanpur L, Naderi RA, Bijanzadeh E, and Emam Y. 2015. Response of faba bean and pea yield and yield components to cereal-legume intercropping under weed competitions. Journal of Cereals Research, 8(1): 150- 163. (In Persian).
Sori S, Amirnia R, Rezaei- chiyaneh E, Sheikh F. 2020. Evaluation of yield and yield components of different faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties in intercropping with triticale (Tritico secale). Journal of Agroecology, 12(1), 143-159. (In Persian).
Stoltz E, and Nadeau E. 2014. Effects of intercropping on yield, weed incidence, forage quality and soil residual N in organically grown forage maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crops Research, 169: 21-29.
Tahir M, Malik MA, Tanveer A. and Ahmad, A. 2003. Competition functions of different canola-based intercropping systems. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2(1):  9-11.
Tsubo M, Walker S, and Ogindo HO. 2005. A simulation model of cereal legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions I. Model development. Field Crops Research, 93: 10-22.
Undie UL, Uwah DF, and Attoe EE. 2012. Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(4): 37-50.
Willey RW. 1990. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agriculture Water Management, 17: 215-231. 
Xu J. 2007. Scientists Find why intercropping of faba bean with maize increases yields. www. Horizoninter national tv. Org. 12-19.
Yan S, Du X, Wu F, Li L, Li C, and Meng Z. (2014). Proteomics insights into the basis of interspecific facilitation for maize (Zea mays) in faba bean (Vicia faba)/maize intercropping. Journal of Proteomics, 109: 111-124.
Yousefnia M, Bannayan M, and Khorramde S. 2014. Evaluation of radiation interception and use by fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and dill (Anethum graveolens L.) intercropping canopy. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 7(3): 412-424. (In Persian).
دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار
دوره 33، شماره 3
مهر 1402
صفحه 17-33

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار