سودمندی کشت مخلوط باقلا (Vicia faba L.) و زیره سبز (.Cuminum cyminum L) در تیمارهای کود آلی، زیستی و شیمیایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 رشته زراعت، گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

     به‌منظور بررسی اثر کودهای شیمیایی و زیستی بر کشت مخلوط باقلا و زیره سبز آزمایشی در سال 1393 به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با 15 تیمار و سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز اجرا  شد. فاکتور اول شامل پنج الگوی کاشت شامل کشت خالص باقلا و زیره سبز و سه الگوی کشت مخلوط جایگزینی باقلا و زیره سبز به صورت ردیفی (یک ردیف باقلا – یک ردیف زیره سبز) و نواری دو ردیف باقلا –دو ردیف زیره سبز و چهار ردیف باقلا -چهار ردیف زیره سبز  بود. فاکتور دوم عبارت از سه سطح کودی شامل کاربرد 100 درصد کود شیمیایی (50 کیلوگرم کود اوره + 150 کیلوگرم سوپرفسفات تریپل در هکتار)، 50 درصد کود شیمیایی+ کودهای زیستی (ازتو بارور+ بارور 2 ) و ورمی کمپوست (10 تن در هکتار) بود. نتایج نشان داد بیشترین تعداد برگ به تیمار 100 درصد کود شیمیایی مربوط بود. بیشترین اجزای عملکرد باقلا در الگوی کشت مخلوط یک ردیف باقلا+ یک ردیف زیره سبز مشاهده شد. بالاترین نسبت برابری زمین و مجموع عملکرد نسبی در همه سطوح کودی به الگوی کشت مخلوط ردیفی 1:1 تعلق داشت. همچنین در کشت مخلوط نواری 2:2 بیشترین نسبت برابری زمین (35/1) به سطوح کودی ورمی کمپوست و بالاترین مجموع ارزش نسبی در کشت مخلوط ردیفی 1:1 با مصرف 100 درصد کود شیمیایی حاصل شد که سودمندی اقتصادی این الگوی کشت را نشان می‌دهد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Advantage of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) and Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) Intercropping under Organic, Biological and Chemical Fertilizer Treatments

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shafighe Sakhavi 1
  • Rouhollah Amini 2
  • Mohammad Reza Shakiba 2
  • Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi-Nasab 2
چکیده [English]

Abstract
        The effect of chemical and biological fertilizer treatments on  intercropping of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) evaluated in factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with 15 treatments and three replications at the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz in 2014. The first factor was including five cropping systems including monoculture of faba bean, monoculture of cumin; three replacement intercropping patterns including row intercropping of faba bean with cumin (1 row faba bean-1 row cumin); strip intercropping as 2 rows faba bean-2 row cumin and 4 rows faba bean-4 rows cumin. The second factor was three levels of fertilizers including 100% chemical fertilizer (50 kg.ha-1 urea+150 kg.ha-1 triple superphosphate), 50% chemical fertilizer + biofertilizer (Azoto barvar + Barvar 2) and Vermicompost (10 ton.ha-1). Results showed that the highest faba bean leaf number was devoted to the 100% chemical fertilizer. The highest values for faba bean yield components were observed in 1:1 intercropping pattern. The highest land equivalent ratio and relative yield total at all fertilizer levels was devoted to 1-1 row intercropping. Also at 2:2 strip intercropping pattern the Vermicompost fertilizer had the highest land equivalent ratio (1.35). The highest relative value total was obtained in 1:1 row intercropping pattern with application of 100% chemical fertilizer that indicates the economic advantage of this planting pattern.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Barvar 2
  • Bio-Fertilizer
  • Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)
  • Relative Value Total (RVT)
  • Vermicompost
Akter N, Alim MA, Islam MM, Naher Z, Rahman M and Iqbal Hossain AS, 2004. Evaluation of mixed and intercropping of lentil and wheat. Journal of Agronomy, 3(1): 48-51.
Allahdadi M, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Shakiba MR and Amini R, 2015. Evaluation of competition, yield quantity and quality of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill.) and calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) in intercropping systems. Journal of Agroecology, 7(1): 38-51. (In Persian).
Allahdadi M, Shakiba MR, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A and Amini R, 2013. Evaluation of yield and advantages of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.) and calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) intercropping systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science, 23(3): 47-58. (In Persian).
Amini R, Shamayeli M and Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, 2014. Yield and relative advantage of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) intercropping under different patterns with soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) and corn (Zea mays L.) in Tabriz condition. Journal of Agroecology, 6(3): 529-541. (In Persian).
Amini R, Shamayeli M, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, 2013a. Assessment of yield and yield components of corn (Zea mays L.) under two and three strip intercropping systems. International Journal of Biosciences, 3: 65-690.
Amini R, Shamayeli M, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Ghanepour S and Alavi-Kia S, 2013b. Relative yield total of two- and three-species intercropping of soybean, maize and sunflower. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 5(11): 1260-1264.
Bakheit BR and Glala AY, 2002. Intercropping fababean with some legumes crops for control Orobanch crenata. Acta Agronomy Hungar, 50(1): 1-60.
Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK and Ghose SS, 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping     systems in an additive experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24: 325-332.
Banitaba A, and Naderi MR, 2009. Effect of cumin planting on establishment of saffron in first year in intercropping of cumin and saffron. The proceeding of the 5th conference of students of Agricultural and natural resources of Iran, Gilan, Iran.
Cakmakc R, Donmez MF and Erdogan U, 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 31: 139-199.
Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Shakiba MR, Javanshir A, Zehtab-Salmasi S, and Sirousmehr AR. 2006. Evaluating the entrepreneurship aspects of maize, soybean, calendula and vetch intercropping. Final report of entrepreneurship-research project. Entrepreneurship center of University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).
Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab A, Amini R, Tamari E, 2015. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) and three cultivars of common bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) intercropping with application of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science, 25(1): 99-113. (In Persian).
El-zieny OAH, 2007. Effect of bio-fertilizers and root exudate of two weeds as a source of natural growth regulators on growth and productivity bean plants (Phasealus vulgaris L.) Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 3: 440-446.
Hansen WR and Shibles  RM, 1978. Seasonal lag of flowering and podding activity of yield-grown soybean. Agronomy Journal, 70:47-50.
Hayder G, Muntaz SS, Khan A and Khan Sh, 2003. Maize and soybean intercropping under various levels of soybean seed rates. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 2: 339-347.
Jahani M, Koochaki A, Nassiri Mahalati M, 2008. Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 6 (1): 67-87. (In Persian).
Khajepour MR, 2009. Industrial crops, JDE Press, Esfahan, Iran. (In Persian).
Malik MA, Farrukh-Saleem M, Cheema MA and Ahmad S, 2003.Influence of different nitrogen levels on productivity of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under varying planting patterns. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4: 490-492.
Manaffee WF and Kloepper JW, 1994. Applications of plant growth agriculture. In: Soil biota management in sustainable farming. Pankburst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR and Grace PR, eds pp:23-31. CSLRO, pub. East Melbourne: Australia.
Mazaheri D, Pasari B and Peighambari A. 2002. Evaluation of intercropping of specified soybean cultivars. Pajouhesh Va Sazandgi, 54(1): 49-54. (In Persian).
Mirela Dusa E and Valentin Roman G, 2009. Researches regarding the productivity of oat-lentil intercropping in the organic agriculture system. Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 41(1): 22-27.
Naghizade M, Ramroodi M, Galavi M, Siahsar B, Heydari M and Maghsoodi AA, 2012. The effects of various phosphorus fertilizers on yield and yield components of maize and grass pea intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 43 (2): 203-2015. (In Persian).
Nazeri P, Kashani A, Khavazi K, Ardakani M, and Mirakhori M, 2012. Effect of use microbial zinc granulated phosphorous bio-fertilizer on growth indices of bean. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(3): 111-126. (In Persian).
Nezami A and Bagheri, 2005. Responsiveness of cold tolerant chickpea characteristics in fall and spring planting: I- phenology and morphology. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 3(1): 143-155. (In Persian).
Nielsen P, Hauggaard H, Ambus E and Jensen S, 2001. Interspecific competition, N used and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crops Research, 70(2): 101-109.
Rahimi M, 2003. Evaluation of yield in intercropping of maize and soybean in Rafsanjan rejoin. Msc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Arsanjan, Iran. (In Persian).
Rezai-Chiyaneh, A, 2008. Ecophysiologic evaluation of maize and faba bean intercropping. Msc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).
Rezvani-Moghadam P, and Moradi R, 2012. Assessment of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on yield and essential oil of cumin and fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences,
43(2): 217-230. (In Persian).
Safari-Ghalee S, 2010. Evaluation of yield and advantage of maize and soybean intercropping. Msc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Sajadi Nik R, Yadavi E, Baloochi H, 2010. Effect of nitrogen and Nitroxin biological fertilizer on sesame yield. The proceeding of the 11th National Iranian Crop Science Congress, Tehran, Iran. Pages 1366-1369.  (In Persian).  
Saudy  HI  and  El-Metwally  MI, 2009.Weed management under different patterns of sunflower-soybean intercropping. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 10: 41-52.
Seifi M, 2006. Evaluating the efficiency of Mycorrhiza and Azotobacter under different levels of nitrogen on yield and yield components of forage maize KSC704 in Central province. The proceeding of the 9th National Iranian Crop Science Congress, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Sullivan P, 2003. Applying the principle of sustainable farming. ATTRA National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service.
Vessey  JK,  2003.  Plant  growth  promoting   rhizobacteria  as  biofertilizers.  Plant   and Soil, 255:  571-586.
Wu SC,  Caob  ZH, Lib ZG, Cheunga KC and  Wonga  MH,  2005.  Effects of  bio-fertilizer containing  N-fixer, P and K  solubilize  and  AM  fungi  on  maize  growth: a greenhouse  trial. Geoderma,
125: 155-166.