<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4310</Issn>
				<Volume>30</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effect of Additive Intercropping System on Yield, Yield Components and Efficiency Indices of Hyssopus officinalis and Plantago ovate Forsk</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Effect of Additive Intercropping System on Yield, Yield Components and Efficiency Indices of Hyssopus officinalis and Plantago ovate Forsk</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>17</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">12284</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/saps.2020.12284</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeinab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Roozpeikar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehrangiz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jowkar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taei-Semiromi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bahare</FirstName>
					<LastName>Parsa Motlagh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Background and Objective&lt;/strong&gt;: This research was conducted in order to measure of yield, yield components and some indices of intercropping and determination of the best intercropping ration in two medicinal plants &lt;em&gt;Hyssopus officinalis&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Plantago ovate&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The experiment was carried out as a randomized complete block design with seven treatments and three replications in the field of research of Jiroft University. The treatments including 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 20% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P20), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 40% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P40), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 60% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P60), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis &lt;/em&gt;+ 80% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P80), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 100% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P100) and single crop of two species (H100) and (P100). The studied characteristics including plant height, number of branches, biomass yield, essence percentage in &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; and plant height, number of spikes per plant, 100-seed weight, grain yield and harvesting index in &lt;em&gt;P. ovate&lt;/em&gt;. Evaluation of efficiency and usefulness intercropping by Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and system productivity index (SPI) were used. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The results showed that all the studied traits except biomass yield of &lt;em&gt;Hyssopus officinalis&lt;/em&gt; were significantly affected by different intercropping ratios in this study. The highest seed yield and biological yield in &lt;em&gt;P. ovate&lt;/em&gt; were obtained in single crop 3393.3 and 4286.6 kg.ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. The highest essence percentage was obtained from single crop of &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; that no significant difference with H100:P20 (161773 and 135842 g.ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;). Maximum LER (1.41) and SPI (21998) were obtained in H100: P80. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The LER for all intercropping treatments was greater than one which indicates that intercropping had advantage over sole crop. According to the results of the study H100: P80 can be suggested as the best cropping pattern in region. &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;strong&gt;Background and Objective&lt;/strong&gt;: This research was conducted in order to measure of yield, yield components and some indices of intercropping and determination of the best intercropping ration in two medicinal plants &lt;em&gt;Hyssopus officinalis&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Plantago ovate&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The experiment was carried out as a randomized complete block design with seven treatments and three replications in the field of research of Jiroft University. The treatments including 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 20% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P20), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 40% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P40), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 60% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P60), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis &lt;/em&gt;+ 80% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P80), 100% &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; + 100% &lt;em&gt;P. ovata&lt;/em&gt; (H100: P100) and single crop of two species (H100) and (P100). The studied characteristics including plant height, number of branches, biomass yield, essence percentage in &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; and plant height, number of spikes per plant, 100-seed weight, grain yield and harvesting index in &lt;em&gt;P. ovate&lt;/em&gt;. Evaluation of efficiency and usefulness intercropping by Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) and system productivity index (SPI) were used. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The results showed that all the studied traits except biomass yield of &lt;em&gt;Hyssopus officinalis&lt;/em&gt; were significantly affected by different intercropping ratios in this study. The highest seed yield and biological yield in &lt;em&gt;P. ovate&lt;/em&gt; were obtained in single crop 3393.3 and 4286.6 kg.ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. The highest essence percentage was obtained from single crop of &lt;em&gt;H. officinalis&lt;/em&gt; that no significant difference with H100:P20 (161773 and 135842 g.ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;). Maximum LER (1.41) and SPI (21998) were obtained in H100: P80. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The LER for all intercropping treatments was greater than one which indicates that intercropping had advantage over sole crop. According to the results of the study H100: P80 can be suggested as the best cropping pattern in region. &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Biomass yield</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">essential yield</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hyssopus officinalis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Land Equivalent Ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Plantago ovate</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">System Productivity Index</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://sustainagriculture.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_12284_2887b87cf5e5245f2e438dd76cfb25e2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
