مطالعه برهمکنش ریزوباکتری‌های محرک رشد و نیتروژن بر رشد و عملکرد برنج (Oryza sativa L.) در شرایط رقابت با علف‌های هرز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت، دانشکده علوم زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

2 گروه زراعت، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف: برنج (Oryza sativa L.) محصول مهمی است که در سراسر دنیا برای تأمین تقاضای رو به رشد غذا در جهان کشت می‌شود. در کشاورزی پایدار کاربرد کودهای زیستی نقش ویژه­ای در افزایش تولید محصول و حفظ حاصلخیزی پایدار خاک دارد که باید تاثیر آنها بر رقابت علف­های هرز مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تاثیر مدیریت کود نیتروژن و ریزوباکتریهای محرک رشد بر عملکرد برنج در رقابت با علف‌های هرز انجام شد.
 
مواد و روش‌ها: به‌منظور بررسی اثر باکتری­های محرک رشد و کود نیتروژن بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد برنج (طارم هاشمی) در شرایط حضور علف‌های هرز آزمایشی فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در سال زراعی 1401 در شهرستان بابل انجام شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل 1) شاهد (عدم مصرف کود نیتروژن و تلقیح باکتری)؛ 2) کود شیمیایی نیتروژن (100 درصد)؛ 3) تلقیح با باکتری Enterobacter sp.؛ 4) تلقیح با باکتری Ensifer sp.؛ 5) تلقیح با باکتری Burkholderia capacia؛ 6) کاربرد تلفیقی باکتریEnterobacter sp.  + 50 درصد کود نیتروژن؛ 7) کاربرد تلفیقی باکتریEnsifer sp.  + 50 درصد کود نیتروژن؛ 8) کاربرد تلفیقی باکتری Burkhoderia capacia + 50 درصد کود نیتروژن به‌عنوان عامل اول و دو سطح عدم حضور و حضور علف هرز به‌عنوان عامل دوم بود. در مرحله برداشت نهایی، تراکم و وزن خشک علف‌های هرز، صفات مورفولوژیک و عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد برنج بررسی شد.
 
یافته‌ها: با توجه به نتایج علف‌های هرز اویارسلام (Cyperus rotondus L.)، سوروف (Echinochloa crus-galli) و قاشق‌واش (Alisma plantago-aquatica L.) در مزرعه حضور داشتند و تراکم و وزن خشک این علف‌های هرز در اثر اعمال تیمار کود شیمیایی افزایش یافت. در بین تیمارهای کودی مورد بررسی، بیشترین تعداد پنجه (03/21 عدد در بوته)، تعداد خوشه (80/17 عدد در بوته)، تعداد دانه پر (156) و تعداد دانه کل (159) در تیمار ترکیبی انتروباکتر+ 50 درصد کود نیتروژن و عدم حضور علف هرز به‌دست آمد، درحالی‌که بیشترین ارتفاع (83/134 سانتی­متر) و وزن هزار دانه (18/25) در تیمار کاربرد کود نیتروژن (100 درصد) به‌دست آمد. علاوه براین، بالاترین شاخص سطح برگ  (08/6) نیز در تیمار کاربرد کود نیتروژن (100 درصد) و در عدم حضور علف‌های هرز دیده شد. با توجه به نتایج بیشترین عملکرد دانه (4248 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و عملکرد بیولوژیک (9314 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در تیمار ترکیبی انتروباکتر + 50 درصد کود نیتروژن در شرایط عاری از علف هرز مشاهده شد که به‌ترتیب 10/97 و 41/49 درصد بیشتر از تیمار شاهد در شرایط حضور علف‌های هرز بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج مطالعه حاضر استفاده از کاربرد ترکیبی تیمار انتروباکتر+ نیتروژن (50 درصد) را برای بهبود عملکرد برنج و حفظ سلامت خاک پیشنهاد می‌کند. به‌طورکلی استفاده از باکتری­های محرک رشد می­تواند با اثر مثبت بر روی عملکرد گیاه زراعی  بخصوص در شرایط رقابت با علف‌های هرز، مصرف کودها وسموم شیمیایی را کاهش دهد که این امر راهبرد مهمی در جهت حرکت به سمت کشاورزی پایدار می­باشد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Study the interaction of Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Nitrogen on the Growth and Yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under weed Competition

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yousef Amini Bengar 1
  • Faezeh Zaefarian 1
  • Sajedeh Golmohammadzadeh 2
  • Arastoo Abbasian 1
1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
2 Department of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
چکیده [English]

Background & Objectives: Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important crop that is grown worldwide to supply the world’s expanding food demand. In sustainable agriculture, the use of biological fertilizers has a special role in increasing crop production and maintaining stable soil fertility, which their effect on weed competition should be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of nitrogen fertilizer management and growth-promoting rhizobacteria on rice yield in competition with weeds.
 
Materials & Methods: In order to investigate the effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and yield components of rice (Tarom Hashemi) in the presence of weeds, a field experiment was carried out on factorial arrangement based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications in 2022 in babol. Experimental treatments include 1) control (without nitrogen fertilizer and PGPR); 2) 100% nitrogen fertilizer; 3) inoculation with Enterobacter sp. bacteria; 4) inoculation with Ensifer sp. bacteria; 5) inoculation with Burkhoderia capacia bacteria; 6) combined application of Enterobacter bacteria + 50% nitrogen fertilizer; 7) combined application of Ensifer bacteria + 50% nitrogen fertilizer and 8) combined application of Burkhoderia + 50% nitrogen fertilizer as the first factor and two levels of absence and presence of weed as the second factor. In the final harvesting stage, density and dry weight of weeds, morphological traits and yield and yield components of rice were investigated.
 
Results: According to the results, purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotondus L.), barnyard grass (Echinocloa cruss-galli) and water plantin (Alisma plantago-aquatica L.) weeds were present in the field, and the density and dry weight of these weeds increased due to the application of chemical fertilizer treatment. Among the investigated fertilizer treatments, the highest number of tiller (21.03 per plant), number of panicle (17.80 per plant), number of filled grain (156) and number of total grain (159) were obtained in the combined treatment of Enterobacter + 50% nitrogen and weed-free conditions. While the highest height (134.83 cm) and thousand grain weight (25.18 gr) was obtained in the treatment of nitrogen fertilizer application (100%). Moreover, the maximum leaf area index (6.08) were observed in the treatment of nitrogen fertilizer application (100%) and weed-free conditions. According to the results, the highest grain yield (4248 kg.ha-1) and biological yield (9314 kg.ha1) were observed in Enterobacter + 50% nitrogen treatment in weed-free conditions, which are 97.10 and 49.41% more than the control treatment in the presence of weeds, respectively.
 
Conclusion: The present study’s results suggested using the combined application of Enterobacter + 50% nitrogen for improving the rice yield and for sustaining the soil health. In general, the use of growth-promoting bacteria can reduce the consumption of chemical fertilizers and herbicides with a positive effect on the yield of crops especially in weed competiton, which is an important strategy in moving towards is sustainable agriculture.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biofertilizer
  • Competition
  • Ente78arobacter
  • Nitrogen Fertilization
  • Rice
Abaid-Ullah M, Hassan MN, Jamil M, Brader G, Shah, MK N and Sessitsch A. 2015. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: an alternate way to improve yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 17: 51-60.
Agricultural Jihad statistics. 1402. Volume (1) Agricultural products. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center. 95p (In Persian).
Ahmad I, Singh YV, Shivay Y, Latam S and Pabbim S. 2011. Relative response to inoculation of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilising micro-organisms on nutrient uptake of Basmati rice and soil properties. Pusa AgriScience, 34: 34-40.
Akhtar MJ, Asghar HN, Shahzad K and Arshad, M. 2009. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria applied in combination with compost and mineral fertilizers to improve growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41: 381-390.
Aminpanah, H. (2016). Effect of crop rotation, Azotobacter chroococcum inoculation and nitrogen rate on rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddy yield. Journal of Crop Production, 9(3), 211-230. (In Persian). doi: 10.22069/ejcp.2016.10291.1804
Ashouri R, Fallah H, Niknezhad Y and Barari Tari D. 2023. Effect of application of plant growth promoting bacteria and amino acids foliar application on growth characteristics, yield, and nutritional value of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 21(3): 333-346. (In Persian). doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2023.81340.1230
Bakhshandeh E, Rahimian H, Pirdashti H and Nematzadeh GA. 2015. Evaluation of phosphate‐solubilizing bacteria on the growth and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in northern Iran. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119: 1371-1382. doi: 10.1111/jam.12938
Boyer H. 2023. Effectiveness of mycorrhizae and vermiculture seed inoculation for germination, vegetative growth, cannabinoid content, and cured flower weight of CBD-Rich Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural Hemp Research, 3(1): 6-23. doi: 10.61611/2688-5182.1021
Cakmakci R, Erat M, Erdoman UG and Donmez MF. 2007. The influence of PGPR on growth parameters, antioxidant and pentos phosphate oxidative cycle enzymes in wheat and spinach plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170: 288-295. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200625105
De Souza, R., Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A., Da Costa, P. B., Meyer, J. & Vargas, L.K. (2013). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in southern Brazilian fields. Plant and Soil, 366: 585-603. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1430-1
Duy M, Hoi N, Ve N Thuc L and Trang N. 2016. Influence of Cellulomonas flavigena, Azospirillum sp. and Pseudomonas sp. on rice growth and yield grown in submerged soil amended with rice straw. Recent Trends in PGPR Research for Sustainable Crop Productivity, 2(3): 238-245.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2022). FAOSTAT/ Productionstat/ Crops [Online]. Available at http://Faostat.Fao.Org/Site/567/Default.aspx. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Ghaffari H, Gholizadeh A, Biabani A, Fallah A and Mohammadian M. 2018. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) application with different nitrogen fertilizer levels in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 41: 715-728.
Ghosh D. 2016. Weed management through herbicide application in direct-seeded rice and yield modeling by artificial neural network. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14 (2): e1003. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2016142-8773
Hahn L, Sá ELSD, Osório Filho BD, Machado RG, Damasceno RG and Giongo A. 2016. Rhizobial inoculation, alone or coinoculated with Azospirillum brasilense, promotes growth of wetland rice. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 40: e0160006. doi: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20160006  
Hassan MN, Afghan S and Hafeez FY. 2010. Suppression of red rot caused by Colletotrichum falcatum on sugarcane plants using plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. BioControl, 55: 531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00317
Hojtipour A, Jafari Haghigi B and Dashkar M. 2011. The effect of combining biological and chemical fertilizers on grain yield, yield components and growth indices of wheat. Scientific-Research Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 5(15): 37-48.
Hussain M, Asgher Z, Tahir M, Ijaz M, Shahid M, Ali H and Sattar A. 2016. Bacteria in combination with fertilizers improve growth, productivity and net returns of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53: 633-645. doi: 10.21162/PAKJAS/16.4901
Kakabouki I, Kousta A, Folina A, Karydogianni S, Zisi C, Kouneli V and Papastylianou P. 2021. Effect of fertilization with urea and inhibitors on growth, yield and CBD concentration of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Sustainability, 13: 2157. doi: 10.3390/su13042157
Ladha JK, Tirol PA, Reddy CK, Cassman KG, Verma S, Powlson DS, Van KC, Chakra D and Pathak H. 2016. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems. Scientific Reports, 6: 19355. doi: 10.1038/srep19355
Lin Y, Watts DB, Kloepper JW and Adesemoye Y. 2019. Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria at various nitrogen rates on corn growth. Agricultural Sciences, 10: 10-18. doi: 10.4236/as.2019.1012114 
Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Luo Y and Freitas H. 2011. Inoculation of endophytic bacteria on host and non-host plants-effects on plant growth and Ni uptake. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 195: 230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.034
Mahajan G, Timsina J, Jhanji S, Sekhon N and KuldeepSingh K. 2012. Cultivar response, dry-matter partitioning, and nitrogen-use efficiency in dry direct-seeded rice in northwest. India Journal of Crop Improvement, 26(6): 767-790. doi:10.1080/15427528.2012.686473
Mansour Ghanaei-Pashaki K, Mohsenabadi G, Biglouei MH and Farhangi MB. 2020. Effect of rice-Duck co-cultivation on rice yield, water productivity and weed control in different cultivation systems. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 18(3): 341-355. (In Persian). doi: 10.22067/gsc.v18i3.86497
Mirzaiee A, Vazan S and Naseri R. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land condition. World Applied Sciences Journal, 11(10): 1287-1291.
Moafi E, Zaefarian F, Akbarpour V and Mansoori I. 2022. Response of sweet basil (Ocimum bacilicum L.) to different nutritional sources in competition with weeds. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 20(2): 197-215. (In Persian). doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2022.72703.1091.
Mondani F, Khani K, Honarmand SJ and Saeid M. 2019. Evaluating effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the radiation use efficiency and yield of soybean (Glycine max) under water deficit stress condition. Agricultural Water Managemen, 213: 707-713. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.11.004
Mukhopadhyay M, Datta JK and Garai TK. 2013. Steps toward alternative farming system in rice. European Journal of Agronomy, 51: 18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.06.005
Murthy KVR, Redy D, Prabhakara S and Reddy G. 2012. Response of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to graded levels of nitrogen under aerobic culture. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 57(4): 367-372. doi: 10.59797/ija.v57i4.4648
Mwashasha R, Hunja M and Kahangi EM. 2016. The effect of inoculating plant growth promoting microorganisms on rice production. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 9: 34-44.
Niknejad Y, Daneshian J, Shirani Rad AH, Pirdashti H and Arzanesh MH. 2016. Evaluation the efficiency of growth promoting bacteria on yield and yield components of rice under deficit irrigation and reduced rates of nitrogen. Applied Field Crops Research, 29(3): 9-19. (In Persian). doi: 10.22092/aj.2016.112591.
Paul J. 2014. Bioresource nutrient recycling and its relationship with biofertility indicators of soil health and nutrient dynamics in rice-wheat cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45(7): 912-924. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2013.867051
Purwanto Y, Yuwariah T, Sumadi B and Simarmata T. 2017. Nitrogenase activity and IAA production of indigenous diazotroph and its effect on rice seedling growth. AGRIVITA. Journal of Agricultural Science, 39(1): 31-37. doi: 10.17503/agrivita.v39i1.653
Rajabian M, Asghari J, Ehteshami MR and Yaghoubi B. 2017. Response of landrace and improved genotypes of rice to weed competition in direct- seeded system. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 13(1): 71-87. (In Persian). doi: 10.22092/ijws.2017.1301.06.
Rezvani M, Halalkhor S, Zaefarian F and Nikkhah H. 2013. Effectiveness of different nitrogen resource on yield components, yield and weed biomass in two varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Research in Field Crop Journal, 1(1): 15-30. [In Persian].
Rodrigues EP, Rodrigues LS, De Oliveira ALM, Baldani VLD, Dos Santos Teixeira KR, Urquiaga, S and Reis VM. 2008. Azospirillum amazonense inoculation: effects on growth, yield and N2 fixation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil, 302: 249-261. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9476-1
Sadegh M, Zaefarian F, Akbarpour V and Emadi M. 2019. Effect of fertilizer sources on physiological and biochemical traits of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) in competition with weeds. Journal of Plant Production Research, 25(4): 67-84. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22069/jopp.2018.14131.2268.
Sathiya K and Ramesh T. 2009. Effect of split application of nitrogen on growth and yield of aerobic rice. Asian Journal of Experimental Sciences, 23(1): 303-306.
Sharma A, Shankhdhar D and Shankhdhar SC. 2013. Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59: 89-94. doi: 10.17221/683/2012-PSE
Singh RK, Kumar P, Prasad B and Singh, S. 2015. Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, 6: 386-391. doi: 10.15740/HAS/IRJAES/6.2/386-391
Singh V, Singh V, Singh S and Khanna R. 2020. Effect of zinc and silicon on growth and yield of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa) in North-Western plains of India. Journal of Rice Research and Developments, 3: 82-86. doi: 10.36959/973/424
Swanton CJ, Nkoa R and Blackshaw RE. 2015. Experimental methods for crop–weed competition studies. Weed Science, Special Issue: 2-11. doi: 10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1
Sweeney AE, Renner KA, Laboski C and Davis A. 2008. Effect of fertilizer nitrogen on weed emergence and growth. Weed Science, 56: 714-721. doi: 10.1614/WS-07-096.1
Tang L, Wan K, Cheng C, Li R, wang D, Pan J, Tao Y, Xie J and Chen F. 2014. Effect of fertilization patterns on the assemblage of weed communities in an upland winter wheat field. Journal of Plant Ecology, 7(1): 39-50. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtt018
Yadav J, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK and Kumar A. 2014. Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecological Engineering, 62: 123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.013
Yu WJ, Li XS, Chen ZJ and Zhou JB. 2018. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on carbon dioxide emissions from soils with different inorganic carbon contents. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29: 2493-2500. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201808.009
Yuvaraj K. 2016. Effect of biofertilizer and inorganic fertilizers on soil health, growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop. Master thesis. College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. 157Pp.
Zheng Y. 2020. Effects of mixed controlled release nitrogen fertilizer with rice straw biochar on rice yield and nitrogen balance in northeast China. Scientific Reports, 10: 9452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66300-