Evaluation of drought tolerance in selected soybean lines

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

In this study,drought tolerance of advanced soybean lines has been investigated. In this study,14soybean lines Along with two control cultivars of Saba and Kowsardar were separately carriedout in two experiments of a randomized complete block design with three replications in two years of2015-2016 in Karaj.These lines have been superior in preliminary experiments indicting in different regions.Both experiments were similarly irrigated until seedling establishment and the emergence of the V4-V5 stage,which coincided with the full development of the fourth to fifth leaves.Afterthat, the first experiment was irrigated weeklyand the second one aweek in between(50-55-and120-100-mm evaporation from ClassA evaporation pan,respectively).Different tolerance and sensitivity indices were used to evaluate the stress response.Indices were grouped by using principal component analysis and genotypes were grouped byusing biplot.Also,grouping wasperformed byusing SIIG indexand the resalt genotypes cluster was comparedwith Fernandez index.The resultsof mean comparison showed that three lines ColumbusxKrasnodar778(L.45),CrafordxLan(L.44)and WilliamsxKatool(L.3)in numberof pods perplant, numberof seeds per pod and1000-seedweight andseedyield had the highest value andwere superiorto both sensitiveand tolerant control cultivars.Bioplate diagram showedthat lines WilliamsxKatool(L.3).NemahaxSavoy(L.3),ColumbusxKrasnodar778(L.45)andSaba and Kosarcultivars were located near the vectorsof important drought resistance indices.Lines WilliamsxKatool(L.3)andCrafordxLan(L.44)tended tobe relatedto the yeildvector under stressconditions,indicating that the high values forthe drought tolerance index in these lines were mostly dueto its high yeild under stress conditions.Accordingto the SIIG index,the line WilliamsxKatool(L.3)was themost tolerant ofdrought stress.The results showedthat in each four methods,Sumof ranking,principal component analysis andSIIG index and fernandez diagram,linesWilliamsxKatool(L.3),CrafordxLan(L.44)andColumbusxKrasnodar778(L.45)werethe most tolerant and linesWilliamsxKatool(L.8),RVBxKatool(L.13)and were the most sensitive to drought stress.Therefore,using rankings for less complication can be effective in selecting tolerant genotypes.

Keywords

References

Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. Shanhua: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan, Publication. 93(410): 257–270.
Fischer RA, Maurer R, 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. І. Grain yields responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: 897–912.
Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campaline RG, Ricciardi GL, Borghi B, 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77: 523-531.
Goodarzvand Chegini Kh, Fotovat R, Bihamta MR, Omidi M, Shahnejant Boushehri A, 2017. Grouping of tolerance indices and response of Kabuli and Desi type chickpea genotypes to drought stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48: 647-664. (In Persian).
Kristin AS, Serna RR, Perez FI, Enriquez BC, Gallegos JAA, Vallego PR, Wassimi N, and Kelly JD, 1997, Improving common Bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science, 37: 43-50.
Kristin A. S., R. R. Serna, F. I. Perez, B. C. Enriquez, J. A.
Kristin A. S., R. R. Serna, F. I. Perez, B. C. Enriquez, J. A.
Kunert K J, Vorster B J, Fenta B A, Kibido T, Dionisio G, and Foyer C H, 2016. Drought stress responses in soybean roots and nodules. Frontiers Plant Science, 7:1015
Lan J, 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. 7: 85–87.
Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP, 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science, 26: 894- 900.
Mishra S, Sarkar U, Taraphder S, Datta S, 2017.Principal Component Analysis, International Journal of Livestock Research,7(5): 19.
Moghaddam Khamseh A, Daneshian J, Amini Dehghi M, Jabbari H and Modarres Sanavy SAM. 2011. Effect of plant density and water deficit on the growth, yield and yield component of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Jouranl of Agronomy Sciences.3 (6): 26-40.
Moosavi SS, Samadi BY, Naghavi MR, Zali AA, Dashti H, Pourshahbazi A, 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert, 12: 165-178.
Morovati I, Kordenaeej A, and Babaei HR, 2021. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in soybeans. Journal of Crop Breeding, 13(37):109-118. (In Persian).
Peghambari SA, Taleb Khani M, Babaei HR, and Alipour H. 2016. Evaluation of tolerance to water deficit stress in diverse soybean genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(4): 933-943. (In Persian).
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Etminan A, Shooshtari L, Maleki-Tabrizi N, and Poczai P,2020. Effects of drought stress on some agronomic and morpho-physiological traits in durum wheat genotypes. Sustainability, 12(5610):1-14.
President, Country Management and Planning Organization. 1397. Yearbook of National Statistics 2016. Statistics Center of Iran, Frost 4968. Pp:912. https://www.amar.org.ir
 Rahi AR, Najafi Zarrini H, Ranjbar Gh, Ghajar Spanlou M. 2020. Identification of drought tolerant genotypes of soybean plant using principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 13(1):27-40. (In Persian).
Rosielle A A, Hamblin J, 1981. Theoritical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non – stress environment. Crop Science, 21: 943-946.
Sabokdast M, Dashtaki M, Sassani J, and Rezaizadeh A, 2019. Evaluation of responses of common bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris. L) Genotypes to drought stress using different stress tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 50(2): 1-9. (In Persian).
Sadeghi L, Rafiee M, Daneshian J. 2021. Effect of drought stress and aerosols on yield and some physiological traits of soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Plant Process and Function, 10 (41) :263-278. (In Persian).
Schober P, Boer C. 2018. Correlation Coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and analgesia, 126(5):1763-1768.
Tahmasebi S, Dastfal M, Zali H, and Rajaie M, 2018. Drought tolerance evaluation of bread wheat cultivars and promising lines in warm and dry climate of the south. Cereal Research, 8(2):209-225. (In Persian).
 
Wei Y, Jin J, Jiang S, Ning S, and Liu L, 2018. Quantitative response of soybean development and yield to drought stress during different growth stages in the Huaibei plain, China. Agronomy, 8:97.
Zali H, Hasanloo T, Sofalian O, Asgharii A, and Enayati Shariatpanahi M, 2019. Identifying drought tolerant canola genotypes using selection index of ideal genotype. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11(29): 117-126. (In Persian).
Zali H, Sofalian O, Hasanloo T, Asghari A, and Zeinalabedini M, 2016. Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding, 78 (20): 77-90. (In Persian).
Zareei Siahbidi A, Rezaeizad A, 2020. Study on response of some oilseed rape genotypes to drought stress. Applied Research in Field Crops, 32(4):1-12. (In Persian).
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION
Volume 33, Issue 1
April 2023
Pages 157-175

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics