Determinants of Soil Conservation Adoption in Dry Lands of Saqqez County (An application of Generelized Ordered Logit Model)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz,

2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz

3 Department of Agricultural Economics

4 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective: Soil protection is a prerequisite for realizing sustainable development and increasing the quantity and quality of food in countries. Soil erosion is one of the most important ecological and economic problems of agricultural and rural societies, which has significantly reduced the production of crops, also it Creates sediments in waterways and reducing performance in the water system, besides in causes inability of the soil to store the carbon cycle, nutrients and water, and is one of the biggest threats in the path of sustainability of agriculture. Soil erosion is one of the most important ecological and economic problems of agricultural and rural societies, which has significantly reduced the production of crops and the inability of the soil to store the carbon cycle, nutrients and water, and is one of the biggest threats in the path of sustainability. In order to prevent erosion and conserve soil, this study aims to determinants of soil conservation adoption among dry farmers in Saqqez County which can be used to develop strategies, policies, and appropriate programs for development, promotion and implementation of soil conservation technologies in effective dry farming.
 
Materials and Methods: This research centered on the community of dryland farmers in Saqqez County, Iran, encompassing a total population of about 7,099 individuals engaged in rainfed farming practices. To derive a representative sample, we applied the Cochran formula, which, under the assumptions of maximum variance (p = q = 0.5), a margin of error set at 5%, and a confidence level of 95%, yielded a sample size of 365 farmers. Data were gathered through a carefully designed questionnaire, distributed using proportionate stratified random sampling across the county's four administrative divisions: Central, Zivieh, Sarshiv, and Imam. This instrument explored the adoption patterns of seven specific soil conservation techniques—namely, crop rotation, application of manure, plowing perpendicular to slopes, retention of crop residues, fallowing, construction of stone bunds, and utilization of chemical fertilizers—alongside various socioeconomic variables. The dependent variable was conceptualized as an ordinal measure, reflecting the number of technologies adopted (ranging from 0 to 7), and further grouped into four distinct categories: no adoption (0), low adoption (1–2), moderate adoption (3–4), and high adoption (≥5). Initially, an ordered logit regression model was estimated to discern the factors influencing adoption. However, upon detecting a breach in the parallel regression assumption through the Brant test (χ² = 100.35, p < 0.01), we transitioned to a generalized ordered logit model, which better accommodates varying threshold parameters across different adoption thresholds. All estimations and analyses were executed using Stata version 14, employing maximum likelihood methods to obtain coefficients and assess model fit.
 
Results: According to the model, at zero level, the variable of the farmer’s record shows a negative sign and the variable of understanding the effects of the soil conservation expresses a positive sign. At level one, however, education variables, participation in soil conservation education classes, membership in rural institutions, area, non-agricultural employment and the number of parts are positive and the labor variable is negative. At the second level, education variables, participation in soil conservation education classes and dry stone maintenance are positive while the variables related to the experience of the farmer and non-agricultural employment show a negative significance.
 
Conclusion: According study’s results, Hence, government and regional authorities can adopt such policies as holding educational classes, providing farmers with facilities and creating non-agricultural jobs for them and take significant steps in conserving soil.
JEL Classifiation: Q2, Q5, Q24, Q26

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bayard B, Jolly C and Shannon D A. 2006. The adoption and management of soil conservation practices in Haiti: The case of Rock Walls. Agricultural Economics Review, 7(2):28-39.
                    http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.44111
Bekele W and Drake L. 2003. Soil and water conservation decision behavior of subsistence farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a case study of the Hunde-Lafto area. Ecological economics, 46(3):437-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00166-6
Belayneh M. 2023. Factors affecting the adoption and effectiveness of soil and water conservation measures among small-holder rural farmers: The case of Gumara watershed. Soil, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 18(1).      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200159
Dennis F and Philip F. 2002. Ordered logit analysis for selectively sampled data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 40(3):477.     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00063-4
Ertiro H. 2006. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation structures in Anna watershed Hadiya zone, Ethiopia, Msc thesis, Addis Ababa university, school of graduate studies, regional and local development studies.
Erwin W, Bielders C, Poesen J, Govers G and Mathijs E. 2010. Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27(1):86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009
FAO. 2015. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)–Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy, p.650.
Greene WH and Hensher DA. 2009. Modelling ordered choices. Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, 10012.
Greene WH. 2002. Econometric Analysis.Macmillan, NewYork. P: 736-740.
Haghjou M, Hayati B and Momeni Choleki D. 2014. Identification of factors affecting adoption of soil conservation practices by some rainfed farmers in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16 (5) : 957-967.  http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.16807073.2014.16.5.1.3
Hoseini S, Salami H and ghorbani M. 2004. Estimation of in-farm costs of soil erosion of dry wheat fields in northwest Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 35(4): 943-954.(In Persian with English Abstract).
Kurdistan Province Agricultural Jihad Organization. 2022. Water and soil management and technical and engineering affairs, report on the state of water resources of the province.(In Persian with English Abstract).
Moges D.M. and Taye A. 2017. Determinants of farmers’ perception to invest in soil and water conservation technologies in the North-Western Highlands of Ethiopia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 5 (1) : 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.02.003
Momeni Choleki D, Dashti Gh, Hayati B and rezaei M 2010. Factors affecting the acceptance of non-mechanical soil conservation measures among rainfed farmers (case study of Izeh city). agriculture Science and Sustainable Production, 20(2):89-101. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Moghaddasi M, Khodaverdizadeh M, Hashemi Bonab S and Sokuti Oskouei R. 2018. Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Soil Conservation Non-Mechanical Methods in Order to Maintain the Sustainability (Case Study: Urmia County). Agricultural science and sustainable production, 28(4): 229-245.
Nosrati sh. 2012. Analysis of factors affecting the choice and consumption of fish meat among households in Tabriz city. MsC thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Nigussie Z, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Nohmi M, Tsubo M, Aklog D, Meshesha T and Abele S. 2017. Farmers' perception about soil erosion in Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development. 28(2):401-411. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2019.101005
Oldeman LR, Hakkeling RU and Sombroek WG. 1991. World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. Global Assessment of Soil Degradation vironmental domain. Land Use Policy. 27(1) :86-94.
Rezaei Moghaddam K, Sabour F and Mennatizadeh M. 2016. Factors affecting the acceptance of soil conservation activities among farmers in Garmsar city. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences of Iran, 13(1). (In Persian with English Abstract).  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20081758.1396.13.1.5.3
Rotich B, Maket I, Kipkulei H, Ocansey CM, Justine Ph, Mohammedzein MA, Csorba A and Micheli E. 2024. Determinants of soil and water conservation practices adoption by smallholder farmers in the central highlands of Kenya. Farming system. 2(2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100081
Shafiei F. 2007. Study on role of the communication technology on adoption of soil conservation practices amongst farmers of Karkheh and Dez watershed. Msc Thesis. Tehran University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (In Persian with English Abstract). .
Shiferaw  B and Holden S.T. 1998. Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian Highlands: A case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa. Agricultural Economics,18 (3): 233-247   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1998.tb00502.x
Sileshi M, Kadigi R, Mutabazi Kh and Sieber S. 2019. Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 7(4):354-361.   International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Wauters E, Bielders C, Poesen J, Govers G and Mathijs E. 2010. Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behavior in the agro-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27: 86–94.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009