Evaluation of Some Important Indicators of Silage Corn Production in No-Tillage Systems

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Conventional tillage increases soil compaction and 25% water and wind erosion. It also causes decrease soil porosity and water capacity. In order to prevent this situation; conservational tillage is considered as an effective strategy. Conservational tillage have important role in soil erosion and improve its quality. Every year Moghan Agro-Industrial & Livestock (MAIL) Company costs a lot to do conventional tillage. In order to achieve the objectives of this study, an experiment was conducted in factorial pattern with completely randomized design with two factors, tillage method (Conventional tillage & No-tillage) and irrigation method (traditional irrigation & Sprinkler irrigation). Results showed that yield, average fuel consumption, traffic, water consumption and fuel consumption productivity index in No-tillage method is better than conventional tillage. Also, the results of the MCDM Engine software showed the Combination of No-tillage system with Sprinkler irrigation with CL*=0.98 (The relative proximity of the option to the ideal solution) is best method for minimum cost of production and maximum yield in silage corn. Therefore, No-tillage system with Sprinkler irrigation can be suitable method for sustainable production of Silage Corn in Moghan region.

Keywords


Asgharpour MJ . 2004. Multi-criteria decisions, 3rd. Publication of university of Tehran. (In Persian).
Asoodar MA, and Sabzeh zar H. 1993. Tillage: fundamentals of machine operation, 3rd. Publication of Nashre Amozesh Keshavarzi. (In Persian).
Afzalinia S and Karami A. 2018. Effect of conservation tillage on soil properties and corn yield in the corn-wheat rotation. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering. Publication of University of Tehran, 49(1): 129-137. (In Persian).
Buckingham F and Pauli AV. 1974. Fundamentals of machine operation (FMO)-Tillage. Publication of John Deere Company.
Chen H. 2013. Traffic and tillage effects on soil water conservation and winter wheat yield in the loess plateau, china. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering Sinica, 20 (3): 507-517.
Compbell JA and Akhtar ME. 1988. Impact of tillage on soil water regimes in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. Soil Physics, 275-276.
Demjanová E, Macák M, Ĉaloviü I, Majerník F, Týr T and Smatana J. 2009. Effects of tillage systems and crop rotation on weed density, weed species composition and weed biomass in maize. Agronomy Research, 7(2), 785-792.
Ghodsypour SH. 2013 .Analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Publication of Amirkabir University of Technology - Tehran Polytechnic. (In Persian).
Katsvairo T, Cox WJ and Vanes H. 2002.Tillage and rotation effects on soil physical.Characteristics. Agronomy Journal, 94: 299-304.
Khorramian M, Bromand S and Ashrafizadeh SR. 2013. Effect of No Tillage, Water Stress and Nitrogen Stress on Nitrate Transfer in Soil and Maize Yield in Northern Khuzestan Province. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28(1): 11-23. . (In Persian).
Lampurlanes J, Angas P, Marlines C. 2001. Root grouth, soil water content and yield of barely under different tillage systems on two soil semiarid conditions. Field Crop Research, 27-40.
Lapen DR, Topp GG, Edwards ME, Curnol WE. 2004. Combination cone penetration resistance water content instrumentation to evaluated cone penetration-water content relationships in tillage research. Soil and Tillage Research, 79: 51-62.
Mesri TG. 2016. Mechanization of Agricultural Industries. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili publication. 62-65 (In Persian).
Momeni M and Sharifi salim A. 2015.MADM Models and Softwares (AHP and TOPSIS). (In Persian).
Nouri Gh, Tabatabaian SH. 2002. Sensitivity analysis of multi-index decision issues relative to the method used. Management Knowledge Quarterly. University of Tehran. www.un.org, 17 June 2019, New York.
Plegrin F, Fernandez JE and Murillo JM. 1997.Soil physical properties ,water depletion and crop establishment under traditional and conservation tillage in southern Spain. Soil and Tillage Research,  41(1-2): 25 -42.
Sparrow SD, Lewis CE and Knight CW. 2006. Soil quality response to tillage and crop residue removal under subarctic conditions. Soil & Tillage Research, 91: 15-21.