Influence of Removal Time and Plant Density Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) on Wheat Seed Yield

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Canarygrass is one of the most important weeds at wheat fields in north of Iran. Considering the effect time of removal on weed- crop interference is critical for the development of accurate crop yield loss models and weed density thresholds. Therefore, field experiments conducted at Mazandaran province, Iran, in 2005 and 2006 to determine the effect of canarygrass density and time of removal on wheat yield. Canarygrass was removed in 4 weeks intervals (mean 170 degree days) from wheat emergence until 24 weeks after that (mean 1097 degree days). Canarygrass density ranged from 0 to 320 plants m. High densities of late removal canarygrass greatly reduced wheat yield (44%). The difference in wheat yield loss between early and late removal of canarygrass was significant (mean 33%). The yield loss caused by individual canarygrass plants at low densities (parameter I) ranged from 0.30 to 0.32%. The effect of canarygrass time of removal (parameter C) varied significantly between years. The results of this study emphasize both the need for  early removal of canarygrass, as well as the importance of weed emergence time in crop yield loss prediction

Keywords

References

ابطالی  ی،  1384. شناسایی تکمیلی و تهیه نقشة پراکنش علف های هرز مزارع گندم آبی کشور با استفاده از GPS. وزارت کشاورزی . مؤسسه تحقیقات آفات و بیماریهای گیاهی، 124 صفحه .
اداره کل هواشناسی استان مازندران. مرکز آمار. 1387
صالحیان  ح، 1381 . بررسی رقابت ، برآورد تابع عملکرد وتعیین آستانه خسارت گندم در کشت مخلوط با فالاریس و چند گونه هرز ، پایان نامه دکتری . دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم وتحقیقات تهران .148 صفحه.
Afentouli CG and Eleftherohorinos IG, 1999. Little seed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and short – spiked canarygrass (Phalaris brachystachys) interference in wheat and barley. Weed Sci 44: 560 – 565.
 Afentouli CG and Eleftherohorinos IG, 1999. Competition between wheat and canarygrass biotypes and their response to herbicides. Weed Sci 47: 55 – 61.    
Bir SS and Sidhu M, 1979. Observations on the weed flora of cultivable lands in Punjab – wheat fields in patiala district. New Bot 6:79–89.
Bosnic AC and Swanton CJ, 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays) . Weed Sci  45: 276 – 282 .
Butler MD, Howell DR and Tickes BR, 1993. Littleseed canarygrass and London rocket control in Bok choy with Benefin and DCPA. Research Report, Western Society of Weed Science, P. 115 .
Catizon P and  Viggiani P, 1980 . Un quadriennio di ricerche sulle Falaridi infestanti il grano . Atti Gi  Fitopatolog  3 : 257 – 311 .
Chikoye D, Weise SF and Swanton CJ, 1995. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci 43: 375 – 380.
Cousens R, Brain P, Donovan JTO and Sullivan PAO, 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci 35: 720 – 725.
Cudney DW and Hill JE, 1979. The response of wheat grown with three population levels of canarygrass to various herbicide treatments. Proc West Soc Weed Sci 32: 55 – 56.
Dieleman A, Hamill AS, Weise SF and Swanton CJ, 1995. Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus spp) interference in Soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 43: 612 – 618.
Frank AC, 2007. Phalaris minor seedbank studies: longevity, seedling emergence and seed production as affected by tillage regime. Weed Res 47: 73 – 83.
Godinho J and Costa JCA, 1981. Con corencia dfa phalaris minor Retz . ha cultura de trigo. I congresso portugues de Fitia tria e de Fitofarmacologia e III Simposio Nacional de Herbologia. 1980. 3: 237 – 243.
Jasieniuk M, Maxwell BD, Anderson RL, 1999. Site – to – Site and year – to – year variation in Triticum aestivum – Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci 47: 529 – 537.
Knezevic SZ, Weise SF and Swanton CJ, 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.) Weed Sci 42: 568 – 573.
Knezevic SZ, Weise SF and Swanton CJ, 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35: 207 – 214.
Koutsoyiannis A, 1973. Theory of Econometrics: An Introductory Exposition of Econometric Methods. London. Pp. 68-95.
Martin MPLD and Field RJ, 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28: 111 – 116.
Mehra SP and Gill HS, 1988. Effect of temperature on germination of Phalaris minor Retz. and its competition in wheat . punjab Agric  Univ Res J 25: 529 – 533.
O'Donovan JT, O'Sullivan PA, Dew, DA and Sharma AK, 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 33: 498 – 503.
Peters NCB and Wilson BJ, 1983. Some studies on the competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. II. Variation of A.fatua emergence and development and its influence on crop yield. Weed Res. 23: 305 – 311.
[SAS] Statistical Analysis systems. 1996. SAS User's Guide. Version 6, 4 the ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis systems institute.
Schabenberger O and Pierce FJ, 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil science. New York. CRC. PP. 183 – 298.
Shirtliffe SJ, Willenborg CJ, May WE, Gulden RH, Lafond GP, 2005. Influence of wild oat (Avena fatua) relative time of emergence and density on cultivated oat yield, wild oat seed production , and wild oat contamination . Weed Sci 53: 342 – 352.
WW.iranwheat.ir/introduction/weeds/weed. Available at: 03/12/2007.
WWW.magiran.com. Available at: 11/11/2007.
WWW.tpo.ir.com. Available at: 11/11/2007.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics