Study of Grain yield and its Compounds of Corn Hybrids at the Moghan Climate

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Moghan, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective: To select the best and stable hybrid via agronomy attributes. So, this project assesses the best hybrid through plant height, ear height, rows per ear, ear diameter, cob diameter, kernel depth, grains per ear, 1000-grain weight, ear yield, and grain yield at the Moghan climate was performed.
Materials and Methods: The experiment based on a randomized complete block design was carried out with four replications during two growing seasons at the Moghan Agriculture Research Station.
Results: Compound analysis for agronomy attributes indicated that the interaction effect of year × hybrid on the plant height, grains per ear, ear diameter, and 1000-grain weight was significant. Grain yield and ear yield just was significant between hybrids (p< 0.05). The Correlation between grain yield with ear yield and grains per ear had a positive association. According to biplot analysis, hybrid No. 3 (K47/2-2-1-4-2-1-1-1× MO17) and hybrid No. 7 (KLM77021/4-1-2-1-2-4-1× K47/3) via grain yield, ear yield, and grains per ear, and also hybrid No. 5 (KLM82010(1) × K3640/3) and hybrid No. 9 (SC647) via 1000-grain weight, rows per ear, ear diameter, plant ear, and plant height were the best corn hybrids in this study. The cluster analysis was classified 11 corn hybrids into two different groups.
Conclusion: Hybrid No. 7 (KLM77021/4-1-2-1-2-4-1× K47/3) was the best stable corn hybrid for the Moghan climate. It can be used grains per ear and ear yield with grain yield, which were introduced by a heat map to cluster and select the best corn hybrids.

Keywords


Aman J, Bantte K, Alamerew S and Sbhatu DB. 2020. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and yield components of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at Jimma, Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Agronomy, 9651537: 7.
Ansarifar J, Akhavizadegan F and Wang L. 2020. Performance prediction of crosses in plant breeding through genotype by environment interactions. Scientific Reports, 10: 11533.
Askary M, Maghsoudi Moud AA and Saffari VR. 2013. Investigation of some physiological characteristics and grain yield of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 3: 93-104. (In Persian).
Choukan R, Estakhr A, Haddadi H, Shiri MR, Rafiei M, Anvari K, Khavari Khorasani S, Faizbakhsh MT, Afarinesh A, Darkhal R, Afsharmanesh GR, Ghasemi S and Moeini R. 2014. Evaluation of grain yield of promising maize hybrids in multi-location trails. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences,15(4): 308-319. (In Persian).
Choukan R, Mostafavi K, Taeb M, Bihamta MR and Majidi Heravan E. 2017. Genetic potential evaluation of Iranian corn Inbred lines using griffing diallel and AMMI model. Journal of Plant Production Sciences, 6: 13-24. (In Persian).
Moharramnejad S and Shiri MR. 2020. Study of genetic diversity in maize genotypes by ear yield and physiological traits. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 30-40. (In Persian).
Nelimor C, Badu-Apraku B, Nguetta SPA, Tetteh AY and Garcia-Oliveira AL. 2020. Phenotypic characterization of maize landraces from Sahel and Coastal West Africa reveals marked diversity and potential for genetic improvement. Journal of Crop Improvement, 34(1): 122-138.
Piran M, Asghari A, Moharramnejad S and Mohammaddoust Chaman Abad H. 2021. Study of genetic diversity in mize genotypes by ear yield and physiological traits. Journal of Crop Breeding, 13(39): 98-107. (In Persian).
Ramazani M, Samieezaeh H, Ebrahimi Koolabee H and Ghasemi A. 2008. Morphological and agronomictraits of maize hybrids on the basis of factor analysis in Hamadan. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 12: 99-108. (In Persian).
Rocandio-Rodríguez M, Santacruz-Varela A, Castillo-González R, Córdova-Téllez L, López-Sánchez H, Hernández-Bautista F, Lobato-Ortiz RJ, García-Zavala J and Pedro Antonio L. 2020. Estimation of genetic diversity in seven races of native maize from the highlands of Mexico. Agronomy, 10(2): 309.
Ruzbehani A, Bsaki T, Karami S and Azizi F. 2018. Evaluation of promising forage maize hybrids under Markazi province climatic condition. Journal of Applied Field Crops Research, 31: 87-92. (In Persian).
Sadeghi F and Rotbeh J. 2013. Evaluation of grain yield and yield components using destcriptive and multivaraite statistics. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(18): 212-221. (In Persian).
Sandhu S and Dhillon BS. 2021. Breeding plant type for adaptation to high plant density in tropical maize-A step towards productivity enhancement. Plant Breeding, 140: 509-518.
Shiri MR, Moharramnejad S, Hanifezadeh M and Bandehhagh A. 2016. Evaluation of yield stability of maize (Zea mays L.) influenced by planting date in Moghan region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26 (2): 203-214. (In Persian).
Smith V, Wesseler JHH and Zilberman D. 2021. New plant breeding technologies: An assessment of the political economy of the regulatory environment and implications for sustainability. Sustainability, 13: 3687.
Wang J and Hu X. 2021. Research on corn production efficiency and influencing factors of typical farms: Based on data from 12 corn-producing countries from 2012 to 2019. PLoS ONE, 16(7): e0254423.