Stability Analysis of Barley Genotypes in Cold Regions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Asistant of Professor of Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Zanjan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREOO), Zanjan, Iran.

3 Associate Prof of Dept. of Seed and Plant Improvement Research, West Azerbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, (AREEO), Urmia, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Horticulture Crops Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, (AREEO), Mashhad, Iran

5 Asistant of Professor of Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREOO), Ardabil, Iran

10.22034/saps.2023.56901.3056

Abstract

Objectives: This research was conducted in order to evaluate the reaction of different barley genotypes and to understand better the genotype × environment interaction effect in different areas of the country's cold climate, and to select stable genotypes.
Materials and methods: Four barley genotypes, including Jalgah, Mehtab, Bahman, CB-96-10, along with four imported genotypes in five stations of Karaj, Zanjan, Jalgarokh, Ardabil, and Miandoab in the form of complete randomized block design with three replications in two consecutive years of evaluation became.
Results: In Eberhart and Russell method, G1, G4, and G6 genotypes; in parametric methods G1, G4, G6, and to some extent G7 genotypes and; in nonparametric methods G1, G4, and G6 genotypes were identified as stable genotypes. According to the comparison of average performance, sustainability criteria and agricultural characteristics and general compatibility using AMMI analysis, G6, G1, and G7 genotypes were recognized as the most suitable and most compatible genotypes, respectively and can be considered as climate compatible cultivars in all cold regions of the country. Genotypes G2, and G3 are also considered varieties with private compatibility.
Conclusion: According to the results, G6, and G1 genotypes can be considered as the most compatible genotypes in all cold regions of the country, and G2, and G3 genotypes can also be considered as genotypes with high private compatibility in high potential regions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abay F, and Bjornstad A. 2009. Specific adaptation of barley varieties in different locations in Ethiopia. Euphytica, 167: 181-195. DOI:10.1007/s10681-008-9858-3.
Acquaah G. 2012. Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9781118313718.
Ahmadi K, Ebadzadeh H, Hatami F, Abd Shah H, and Kazemian A. 2020. Agricultural Statistics of the Crop Year 2019-2020, Volume One: Crop Products. pp, 98. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Deputy for Planning and Economy, Information and Communication Technology Center (In Persian).
Ahmadi J, Vaezi B, and Pour-Aboughadareh AR. 2016. Evaluation of forage yield stability of advanced lines of Grass pea (Lathyrus sativa L.) by parametric and non- parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(17): 149-159 (In Persian). DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.159.
Akbarpour OA, Dehghani H, and Sorkhi-Lalehloo B. 2011. Investigating univariate and multivariate stability parameters of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) promising genotypes in cold climates of Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 42(1): 23-32 (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.20084811.1390.42.1.3.9.
Amiri Oghan, H, Alemzadeh Khoomaram MH, and Javadifar F. 2004. Stability of seed yield in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6(3): 203-204 (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.15625540.1383.6.3.3.2
Badooei Delfard R, Mostafavi K, and Mohammadi A. 2016. Genotype environment interaction and yield stability of winter barley varieties (Hordeum vulgare L.). Jounal of Crop Breeding, 20(3): 99-106 (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.22286128.1395.8.20.1.8
Barati A, Tabatabaee SA, Mahlooji M, and Saberi MH. 2019. Evaluation of grain yield and it’s stability in barley promising lines in saline areas. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29(1): 1-13 (In Persian).
Dashtaki M, YazdanSepas A, NajafiMirak T, Ghanadha MR, Joukar R, Islampour MR, Moayedi AA, Nazeri M, AbediOskooie MS, Aminzadeh G, Soltani R, Ashouri S, and Kouchaki AR. 2004. Stability of grain yield and harvest index in winter and facultative bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) Genotypes. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 20(3): 263-280 (In Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.110583
Ebadi Segherloo A, Sabaghpour SH, Dehghani H, and Kamrani M. 2008. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 162: 221-229. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9552-x
Ebdon JS, and Gauch HG. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national. Turfgrass performance trials‎: I. Interpretation of genotype-environment interaction. Crop Science, 42: 489-496. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.4890
Eberhart SA, and Russell WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Farshadfar E, and Sutka J. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 54(4): 459- 467. DOI: 10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.4.8
Finlay KW, and Wilkinson GN. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 752-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742
Francis TR, and Kannenberg LW. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize: Ι - A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 1029-1034. DOI: 10.4141/cjps78-157
Ghazvini H, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sharifalhossaini M, Razavi SA, Mohammadi S, Ghasemi Kalkhoran M, Fathi Hafshejani A, and Khakizade GH. 2018. Phenotypic stability analysis of the barley genotypes in the cold regions of Iran. Crop Breeding Journal, 8(1and 2): 17-29 (In Persian). DOI: 10.22092/cbj.2019.127226.1037
Harsh M, Sawhney RN, Singh SS, Chaudhary DN, Sarmara D, and Sharma JB, 2000. Stability analysis of high yielding wheat at varying fertility levels. Indian Journal of Genetic, 60: 471-476.
Huehn VM. 1990. Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part I: Theory. Euphytica, 47: 189-194. DOI: 10.1007/BF00024241
Jahromi HMA, Khodarahmi M, Mohammadi AR, and Mohammadi A. 2011. Stability analysis for grain yield of promising durum wheat genotypes in southern warm and dry agro-climatic zone of Iran. Iranean Journal of Crop Science, 13(3): 565-579 (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.15625540.1390.13.3.9.7
Jamali SH. 2012. National guidelines for tests to determine the agronomic value of barley cultivars. Seed Registration and Certification Research Institute. Karaj.
Jamshi Moghaddam M, and Pourdad SS. 2009. Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods for analyzing genotype × environment interactions in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 147: 601-612 (In Persian). DOI: 10.1017/S0021859609990050
Kang MS. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal, 85: 754-757. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030042x
Kang MS. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 16: 113-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23782771
Koocheki, A, Sorkhi B, and Eslamzadeh Hesari MR. 2012. Study on stability of elite barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes for cold regions of Iran using AMMI method. Cereal Research. 2(4), 261-249. (In Persian). DOR: 20.1001.1.22520163.1391.2.4.1.7
Mohammadi R, Abdulahi A, Haghparast R, and Armion M. 2007. Interpreting genotype × environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods. Euphytica, 157: 239-251. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9417-3
Nassar R, and Huehn M. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43: 45-53. DOI: 10.2307/2531947
Olivoto T. 2019. Metan: multi environment trials analysis. R package version 1.1.0. https://github.com/TiagoOlivoto/metan (accessed 24 June 2019). DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13384
Plaisted RL. 1960. A shorter method for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently over locations. American Potato Journal, 37: 166-172. DOI: 10.1007/BF02855271
Plasted RL, and Peterson LC. 1959. A technique for evaluation the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal, 36: 281-285. DOI: 10.1007/BF02852735
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Yousefian M, Moradkhani H, Poczai P, and Siddique KHM. 2019. STABILITYSOFT: A new online program to calculate parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applications in Plant Sciences, 7(1): e1211. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1211
Ramazani A. 2012. The study of yield stability of rice genotypes in Isfahan province. Cereal Research, 2(3): 181-192 (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.22520163.1391.2.3.2.6
Rodriguez M, Rau D, and Papa R. 2007. Genotype by environment interactions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): different responses of landraces, recombinant inbred lines and varieties to Mediterranean environment. Euphytica, 163(2): 231-247. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9635-8
Romer T. 1917. Sind die ertragsreichen sorten ertragssichers? Milt. DLG. 32: 87-89 .
Roustaie M, Sadeghzadeh Ahari D, Hesami A, Soleymani K, Pashapour H, Nader-Mahmoudi K, Pour Siahbidi MM, Ahmadi M, Hassanpour Hosni M, and Abedi-Asl M. 2003. Study of adaptability and stability of grain yield of bread wheat genotypes in cold and moderate-cold dry land areas. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 19(2): 263-275 (In Persian). DOI: 10.22092/spij.2017.110953
Roustaie M, Mogaddam M, Mahfouzi S, and Mohammadi A. 1996. Comparison of stability analysis of grain yield in wheat and barley cultivars in dry lands. Proceedings of the 4th Iranian Congress of Crop Production and Plant Breeding. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. pp, 252 (In Persian).
Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H, and Sabaghpour SH. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science, 46: 1100-1106. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122
Saeedi A, Akbari A, Bakhtiar A, Mehrvar MR, and Nategh Z. 2005. Specifications of bread wheat, durum wheat, barley, triticale and rye cultivars introduced by the Cereals Research Department. Publication of agricultural education. pp, 105.
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION
Volume 34, Issue 3
October 2024
Pages 217-234

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics