Grain Yield, Yield Components and Relative Water Content in Maize (Zea mays L.) under Water Deficit Stress and two Mycorrhizal Fungi

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The effects of two mycorrhizal fungi species on grain yield, yield components, relative water content (RWC) and chlorophyll content in maize (SC704) under water deficit stress, under field experiment was assessed out as a split plot design with four replications in 2016 at Moghan Research Station. Water stress treatments included commonly available irrigation water referred to as control and the interrupted irrigation before flowering as the main plot, and two different mycorrhiza species, including Glomus mosseae and Glomus etunicatum and also a control (without any inoculation) as sub plots. Results showed that water stress significantly decreased grain yield, yield components, relative water content (RWC) and chlorophyll content. The applied water deficit stress reduced grain yield, yield components, RWC and chlorophyll content about 14, 13, 20 and 13 percent, respectively. Mycorrhizal fungi increased plant height, RWC and chlorophyll content in maize. Interaction between water stress and strains of mycorrhiza had only an impact on grain yield and 100-seed weight. The maximum grain yield and 100-seed weight were recorded in plots irrigated in normal condition and inoculated with G. mosseae species on control irrigation. Based on the results of this study, for enhancing grain yield and chlorophyll content using mycorrhizal fungi especially, G. mosseae species was recommended.
 

Keywords


Akbari G, Ghorchiani M, Alikhani HA, Allahdadi I and Zarei M, 2012. Effect of biological and chemical phosphate fertilizers on growth indices and grain yield of maize under deficit irrigation conditions in Karaj region. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 22: 51-67. (In Persian). 
Benabdellah K, Abbas Y, Abourouh M, Aroca R and Azcon R, 2011. Influence of two bacterial isolates from degraded and non-degraded soils and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi isolated from semi-arid zone on the growth of Trifolium repens under drought conditions: Mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. European Journal of Soil Biology 47: 303-309.
Boomsma CR and Vyn TJ, 2008. Maize drought tolerance: Potential improvements through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Field Crops Research, 108:14–31.
Copetta A, Lingua G and Berta G, 2006. Effects of three AM fungi on growth, distribution of glandular hairs and essential oil production in Ocimum basilicum L. Mycorrhiza. 16: 485-494.
Derera J, Tongoona P, Vivek BS and Laing MD, 2008. Gene action controlling grain yield and secondary traits in southern African maize hybrids under drought and non-drought environments. Euphytica, 162: 411-422.
Ghabooli M, Hosseini Salekdeh G and Sepehri M, 2015. The effect of mycorrhiza-like fungus Piriformospora indica on some morphophysiological traits of rice under normal and drought stress conditions. Plant Production Technology, 15: 59-89. (In Persian).
Ghobadi R, Shirkhani A and Jalilian A, 2015. Effects of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, its components, water and nitrogen use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L.) cv. SC. 704. Agronomy Journal, 104: 79-87. (In Persian).
Gholinezhad E, 2016. Effects of different irrigation levels and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on morphological traits and grain yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) landraces. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 26: 83-95. (In Persian).
Ghorchiani M, Akbari G, Alikhani HA, Allahdadi I and Zarei M, 2012. Effect of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, plant growth promoting Rhizobacterium and drought stress on different forms of soil potassium and potassium uptake of maize. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 22: 272-282. (In Persian).
Kaman H, Kirda C and Sesveren S, 2011. Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 98: 801-807.
Kaschuk, G., Kuyper, T. W., Leffelaar, P. A., Hungria, M., and Giller, K. E. 2009. Are the rates of pho- tosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41: 1233-1244.
Heidari, M and Karami V, 2013. Effects of water stress and different mycorrhiza species on grain yield, yield components, chlorophyll content and biochemical components of sunflower. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 6: 17-26. (In Persian).
Hugh JE and Davids RF, 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and while canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal, 95: 688-696.
James B, Rodcl D, Lorctru U, Rcynaldo E and Tariq II, 2008. Effect of vesicular arboscular mycorrhiza (VAM) fungi inoculation on coppicing ability and drought resistance of Senna speetabilis. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40: 2217-2224.
Makumbi D, Betraun JF, Baunziger M and Ribaut JM, 2011. Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions. Euphytica, 180: 143-162.
Mirshekari B, 2016, Effect of mycorrhizal strain on yield and essence of two fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) land races under water stress conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10: 669-682. (In Persian).
Moharramnejad S, Valizadeh M, Sofalian O, Shiri MR and Asgri A, 2015. Effect of water deficit stress on agronomic traits and superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) activity in maize plant (Zea mays L.). Cereal Research, 6: 100-110. (In Persian).
Naghashzadeh MR, Heidari H, Sharifabad E, Majidi Heravan M, Rafiee F and Rejali N, 2014. Imantalab.Evaluation of maize leaf gas exchanges with application of mycorrhizal biofertilizer under drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 30: 47-59. (In Persian).
Nezarat S and Gholami A, 2009. The effect of co-inoculathon of Azospirillum and Psedomonasrhizobacteria on nutrient of maize (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Agronomy, 1: 25-32. (In Persian).
Panwar J and Tarafdar JC, 2006. Distribution of three endangered medicinal plant species and their colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Arid Environments, 65: 337-350.
Porras A, Soriano-Martín ML, Porras-Piedra A and Azcon R, 2009. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased growth, nutrient uptake and tolerance to salinity in olive trees under nursery conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166: 1350-59.
Rabbani J and Emam Y, 2012. Yield response of maize hybrids to drought stress at different growth stages. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 1(2): 65-78. (In Persian). 
Ribaut JM, Betran J, Monneveux P and Setter T, 2012. Drought tolerance in maize. In: Bennetzen, J.L., Hake, S.C. (Eds.), Handbook of Maize: Its Biology. Springer, New York, pp. 311–34.
Shiri MR and Bahrampour T, 2015. Genotype×environment interaction analysis using GGE biplot in grain maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different irrigation conditions. Cereal Research, 5(1): 83-94. (In Persian).
Souza RP, Machadoa EC, Silva JA, Lagoa AM and Silveira J, 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 51: 45-56.
Taheri F and Fathi A, 2016. The impacts of mycorrhiza and phsphorus along with the use of salicylic acid on maize seed yield. Journal of Crop Ecophsiology, 10: 657-668. (In Persian).
Winterhalter L, Mistele B, Jampatong S, and Schmidhalter U, 2011. High throughput phenotyping of canopy water mass and canopy temperature in wellwatered and drought stressed tropical maize hybrids in the vegetative stage. European Journal of Agronomy, 35: 22–32.
Wu B, Cao SCL, Cheung ZH and Wong KC, 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth. Geoderma, 125: 155-162.
Yan W, Zhong Y and Shangguan Z, 2016. Evaluation of physiological traits of summer maize under drought stress. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 66: 133-140.
Zlatev Z and Lidon FC, 2012. An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 24: 57-72.