تاثیر قارچ تریکودرما، هومیک اسید و باکتری‌های محرک رشد بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه گندم رقم افق

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، واحد نراق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نراق، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران.

3 گروه علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران

10.22034/saps.2023.56028.3019

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به منظور مطالعه اثر قارچ تریکودرما، هومیک اسید و باکتری‌های محرک رشد بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه گندم رقم افق به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی و با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی طاهرآباد کاشان در سال زراعی 97-98 انجام گرفت. فاکتور اول باکتری‌های محرک رشد (ازتوباکتر کرکوکوم + آزوسپیریلیوم لیپوفروم + سودوموناس پوتیدا) در دو سطح مصرف و عدم مصرف، فاکتور دوم قارچ تریکودرما (مصرف و عدم مصرف) و فاکتور سوم شامل هیومیک اسید به میزان 200 کیلوگرم در هکتار و بصورت خاک کاربرد (مصرف و عدم مصرف) بود. نتایج نشان داد باکتری‌های محرک رشد، قارچ تریکودرما و هومیک اسید منجر به افزایش ارتفاع، کلروفیل a و b، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه گندم گردید. باکتری‌های محرک رشد، تریکودرما و اسید هیومیک بترتیب منجر به افزایش 8/43، 7/21 و 6 درصدی عملکرد دانه در مقایسه با شاهد گردید. استفاده توام باکتری‌های محرک رشد، قارچ تریکودرما و هومیک اسید منجر به افزایش عملکرد دانه، اجزای عملکرد و شاخص برداشت در مقایسه با کاربرد منفرد و همچنین شاهد گردید. بیشترین عملکرد دانه با کاربرد توام باکتری‌های محرک رشد، قارچ تریکودرما و به میزان 7/7466 کیلوگرم در هکتار و بیشترین شاخص برداشت نیز با کاربرد توام کودهای زیستی و به میزان 3/32 درصد به دست آمد. به طور کلی با توجه به یافته های این پژوهش، می‌توان با کاربرد توام باکتری‌های محرک رشد، تریکودرما و اسید هیومیک افزایش عملکرد دانه معنی‌داری را در گندم به دست آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of growth-promoting bacteria, trichoderma fungus and humic acid on yield and yield components of wheat Var. Ofogh

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shirin Toughani 1
  • Mojtaba Jafarzadeh kenarsary 2
  • Hamid Dehghanzadeh 3
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Naragh branch, Islamic Azad University, Naragh, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Saveh branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
3 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Payame Noor University, I.R. of IRAN
چکیده [English]

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria , trichoderma fungi and humic acid on the yield and physiological characteristics of wheat (Var. Ofogh) as a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three factors and three replications at the research field of the Kashan during 2017-2018 growing season. The first factor was plant growth promoting rhizobacteria such as Azotobacter chroococcum + Azospirillum lipoferum + Pseudomonas putida (application and non-application), the second factor was two concentrations of trichoderma fungi (application and non-application) and three factor was humic acid soil application (0 and 200 kg. ha-1). The Results showed that plant growth-promoting bacteria, trichoderma fungus and humic acid led to an increase in plant height, chlorophyll a and b, grain yield and yield components of wheat. Growth-promoting bacteria, trichoderma and humic acid led to an increase of 43.8, 21.7 and 6% in grain yield compared to the control, respectively. The combined use of growth-promoting bacteria, trichoderma fungus and humic acid led to an increase in grain yield, yield components and harvest index compared to single application and control.The highest grain yield was obtained with the combined application of growth-promoting bacteria and trichoderma fungus amounting to 7466.7 kg per hectare and the highest harvest index was obtained with the combined application of biological fertilizers at the rate of 32.3%. In general, it is possible to obtain a significant grain yield increase in wheat with the combined application of plant growth-promoting bacteria, trichoderma and humic acid.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biological yield
  • Biofertilizer
  • Harvest index
  • Sustainable agriculture
  • Wheat
Ameneh Mazlumi L, Alizadeh HR, Broumand N and Azami Sardooei Z. 2016. Evaluation of trichoderma stability in different soils and its effects on the growth performance of cucumber. Biological Control of Pests and Plant Diseases. 4(2): 99-108. Doi: 10.22059/jbioc.2015.56407.
Amirabadi M, Ardakani MR, Rejali F, Borji M and KHaghani S. 2009. Determination of aAzotobacter and mycorrhizal symbiosis efficiency under different levels of phosphorus on yield and yield components of forage maize (KSC 704) in Arak. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 40(2): 45-51. Doi: 20.1001.1.20084811.1388.40.2.5.9. (In Persian).
Amraei B, Ardakani MR, Rafiei M, Paknejad F and Rejali F. 2016. Effect of biofertilizers mycorrhizae and azetobacter on grain yield wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties in Khorramabad. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 12(|1): 15-30. https://iapb.karaj.iau.ir/article_526082.html. (In Persian).
Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated choloroplast polyphenol-oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
Aya H, and Gulser F. 2005. The effect of sulfur and humic acid on yield components and macronutrient contents of spinach (Spinacia oleracea Var. Spinoza). Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(6): 801- 804. DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2005.801.804
Bakhshsei S, Rezvani Moghadam P and Nasiri Mahalati M. 2011. The effect of biological fertilizer and different amounts of chemical fertilizer on wheat yield. 01st Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and cleaner product. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Isfahan, Iran. (In Persian).
Balemy T Pal N and Saxena Ak. 2007. Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to combined application of biological and chemical nitrogenous fertilizers. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica .89:107-114. Doi: 10.2478/v10014-007-0013-y.
Behravan H, KHorassani R, Fotovat A, Moezei A and Taghavi M. 2020. The Effect of humic acid and phosphorus fertilizer on dry matter and water use efficiency of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE) (Scientific Journal of Agriculture).43(3):163-177. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=827508. (In Persian).
Biary A, Golami A and Asadi Rahmani H. 2011. Study of the effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria of Azotobacter and Azosprillium on growth traits and yield of corn (Zea maize L.). Water and Soil. 25: 1. 1-10.  Doi:20.1001.1.20084757.1390.25.1.1.6. (In Persian).
Chamani F, Khodabande N, Habibi D, Asgharzade A and Davoodi Fard M. 2012. Effects of salinity stress on yield and yield components of inoculated wheat by plant growth promoting bacteria (Azotobacter chroocccum, Azospirillum lipoferum, and Pseudomonase putida) and humic acid. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 8(1): 25-37. https://sid.ir/paper/190344/fa. (In Persian).
Dabaghian Z, Pirdashti H, Abasian A and Bahari Saravi SH. 2015. The effect of biofertilizers, Thiobacillus, Azotobacter, Azospirillum and organic sulfur on nodulation process and yield of soybean (Glycine Max L. Merr.). Applied Field Crops Research. 28(107): 17-25. Doi:10.22092/aj.2015.105681. (In Persian).
Demir S. 2004. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on some physiological growth parameters of pepper. Turkish Journal of Biology. 28: 85-90. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/biology/vol28/iss2/5
Hamidi A, Asgharzadeh A, Chokan A, Dehghan Shoar M, Ghalavand A and Malakoty M. J. 2007. Study on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) biofertilizers application in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation by adequate input. Environmental Sciences, 4(4): 1-20. https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_96673.html?lang=fa. (In Persian).
Harman GE, Björkman T, Ondik K and Shoresh M. 2008. Changing paradigms on the mode of action and uses of Trichoderma spp. For Biocontrol. Outlooks Pest Manage. 19: 24-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1564/19feb08
Hatef Heris H, Zehtab Salmasi S and Arzanlou M., 2020. Effect of some trichoderma and mycorrhizal fungai species on growth properties and grain yield of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science (University of Tabriz). 30(1):191-209. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=753976. (In Persian).
Heidari M, Paydar A, Baradarn Firozabad M, Abedinin Esfalati M. 2020. The Effect of drought stress and application of humic on quantitative yield, photosynthetic pigments, and mineral nutrients content in sunflower seeds. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 50(4): 51-62. Doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2018.253008.654448. (In Persian).
Hoseini Moghaddam M, Salehi A and Rezaei R. 2019. The effect of various biological treatments on germination and some seedling indices of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology. 7(2): 59-74. Doi: 10.22034/ijsst.2019.110904.1100. (In Persian).
Jalali Z, Shoor M, Nemati H and Rohani H. 2014. Effect of trichoderma and Iron on the quality and quantity Spathiphyllum and Tradescantia. MSc Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian).
Joshi BB, Bhatt RP and Bahukhandi D. 2010 Antagonistic and plant growth activity of trichoderma isolates of western Himalayas. Journal of Environmental Biology 31(6): 921-928. https://europepmc.org/article/med/21506476
Metwali MR, Ehab-Manal H, Tarek E and Bayoumi Y. 2010. Agronomical traits and biochemical genetic markers associated with salt tolerance in wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(5): 174-183. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2011/174-183.pdf
Mirhajian A. 2012. What is the humic acid? Agricultural engineering monthly Journal. 33(7-16). (In Persian).
Mohammadi Kashka F, Pirdashti H and Yaghoubian Y. 2018. Inoculation with Trichoderma virens and Piriformospora indica for Improving the morphological and physiological traits related to grain yield of rice under different rates of phosphorus fertilizer. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 11(44(4)): 857-874. https://jcep.tabriz.iau.ir/article_539523.html?lang=en. (In Persian).
Mohammad Varzi R. 2010. Effect of microbial fertilizers (nitroxin and bio phosphor) and nitrogen on quality and quantity traits of sunflower. M.Sc. Tesis, Islamic Azad University, Karaj branch, Karaj. (In Persian).
Mohsennia O and Jalilian J. 2012. Response of safflower Seed quality characteristics to different soil fertility systems and irrigation disruption. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3(5): 968-976.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-safflower-Seed-quality-characteristics-Mohsennia-Jalilian/7aec46387b672171b90fbee0b34aa42bb0a793b1
Nasirii A, Yarnia M, Hassanpanah D, Farahvash F and Khalilvand E. 2021. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and chemical fertilizer application on Solanum tuberosum L. cultivars in aeroponic culture system and field conditions. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 11 (2) :109-124. Doi:10.47176/jcpp.11.2.36151. (In Persian).
Rahimi Z, Mozafari H and Hassanpour Darvishi H. 2016. Investigation the effect of humic acid in irrigation water on yield and yield components of rapeseed. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 12(1): 95- 106. https://iapb.karaj.iau.ir/article_526184.html (In Persian).
Rezaloo Z, Shahbazi S and Askari H. 2020. Biopriming with trichoderma on germination and vegetative characteristics of sweet corn, sugar beet and wheat. Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Technology. 8(2): 199-210. Doi: 10.22034/ijsst.2018.121197.1182. (In Persian).
Sabzevari S, Khazaei HR and Kafi M. 2010. Study on the effects of humic Acid on germination of four wheat cultivars (Triticun aestivum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 8(3): 473-480. Doi: 10.22067/gsc.v8i3.7765. (In Persian).
Saghafi K, Ahmadi J, Asghar-zadeh A and Esmailizad A. 2013. An evaluation of the influence of PGPR on wheat growth indices under saline stress. Journal of Sol Biology, 1(1): 47-59. Doi: 10.22092/sbj.2013.120920. (In Persian).
Salahiostad M, Abedy B and Selahvarzi Y. 2021. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on growth characteristics and absorption of some elements in basil under drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 14(4): 1017-1027. Doi: 10.22077/escs.2020.3441.1861. (In Persian).
Sarwar M, Ahmed S, Arsalan M and Khan M. 2017. Humic acid affects zinc availability and wheat yield in zinc deficient calcareous soil. Journal of Applied Agriculture and Biotechnology, 2(1): 19−25. http://jaab.uaar.edu.pk/index.php/jaab/article/view/34. (In Persian).
Sharifi R and Lotfollah F. 2017 Evaluation of effects of azotobacter, azospirillum and psedomunas inoculation and spraying time of nitrogen on fertilizer use efficiency and growth of triticale. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production. 5(4): 115-132. Doi: 20.1001.1.23221267.1394.5.4.7.4 (In Persian).
Malathrakis N E. 1985. Tomato crown and root rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici in Greece. Plant Pathology, 34: 438-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1985.tb01385.x
Tahir MM, Khurshid M, Khan MZ, Abbasi MK and Kazmi H. M. 2011. Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere. 21, 124-131. 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60087-2. (In Persian).
Tourfi F and Shokuhfar A. 2019. Effect of humic acid on yield, yield components and physiological parameters of wheat in deficit irrigation conditions. Journal of Plant Production Sciences. 9(2): 121-132. . https://jpps.shoushtar.iau.ir/article_669602.html. (In Persian).
Turan M, Gullucea M, Cakmakcie R and Oztasa T. 2010. The effect of PGPR strain on wheat, yield and quality parameters. In Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1– 6 August Brisbane, Australia, Pp: 140-143.
Vatanpour Z, Motafakker Azad R, Jahanbakhsh S, Movafeghi A and Sabzie Nojah Deh M. 2021. Evaluation of the effect of Azotobacter crococum and Pseudomonas putida on photosynthetic pigments and wheat yield under cadmium stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 14(4): 1147-1161. Doi: 10.22077/escs.2020.3512.1869. (In Persian).
Vosoughi Tabar H, Hosseini Tafreshi S and Dehghanzadeh H. 2018. Effect of azetobacter on growth indices, yield and essence content of two cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) landraces under salinity conditions. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research. 34(2): 261-271. Doi: 10.22092/ijmapr.2018.120473.2244. (In Persian).
Yousefipor M, Lack S and Payandeh K. 2019. Evaluation of the combined effect of biological and chemical phosphorous fertilizers and micronutrient on seed and protein yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 13(49(1)): 103-120. Doi: 10.30495/jcep.2019.664840. (In Persian).
Zandi N, Khalesro S, Badakhshan H and Heidari G. 2021. Effect of humic acid foliar application on the yield and morphological traits of some safflower cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 31(4): 35-48. Doi: 10.22034/saps.2021.44512.2636. (In Persian).
Zekavati H, SHoor M, Rohani H, Fazeli Kakhki S and Ganji Moghadam E. 2019. Impact of trichoderma (65 Fungus) on morphological and biochemical traits of tuberose under drought stress. Journal of Crops Improvement (Journal of Agriculture). https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=689905. (In Persian).