تاثیر کودهای فسفاته و هیومیکی بر شاخص‌های کمی، کیفی و غلظت عناصر غذایی برگ گیاه گلرنگ

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 مرکز مطالعات کشاورزی پایدار، دانشکده علوم گیاهی ومحیطی، دانشگاه نیومکزیکو، آمریکا

4 مدیرعامل شرکت قیزیل توپراق سهند، مراغه، ایران

10.22034/saps.2023.55579.3007

چکیده

این تحقیق به منظور امکان کاهش یا جایگزینی کود فسفات با اسید‌هیومیک در جهت بررسی بر خصوصیات-رشدی، عملکرد دانه وجذب عناصرغذایی پرمصرف و کم مصرف در گیاه گلرنگ در راستای کاهش هزینه‌ها و افزایش برداشت انجام گردید. برای این منظور ازکود سوپرفسفات تریپل و اسید هیومیک (لئوناردیت) در تیمارهای ترکیبی و جداگانه در کشت گلرنگ استفاده شد.کشت گلرنگ رقم گلدشت با 9 تیمار در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی انجام شد. صفات ریخت‌شناسی، رویشی، عملکردی و عناصرغذایی در برگ گیاه گلرنگ اندازه‌گیری شد. تیمار P50H100 در ارتفاع بوته، قطرساقه، تعدادشاخه اصلی، فتوسنتز، کلروفیل، هدایت روزنه‌ای، تعداد طبق، وزن صددانه، عملکرد دانه، وزن خشک اندام‌هوایی، شاخص‌برداشت، درصد‌روغن و محصول‌روغن بیشترین مقدار را داشت. بعد از تیمار P50H100 تیمار H200 و P25H150 نتایج بیشتر و معنی داری در این شاخص‌ها داشتند. تیمار P50H100 بیشترین درصد نیتروژن برگ، تیمار P50H100 و P50 بیشترین درصد فسفر برگ، تیمارهای H200، P25H150 و P50H100 بیشترین مقدار پتاسیم برگ، تیمار H200 بیشترین مقدار کلسیم برگ، تیمار P25H150 بیشترین مقدار منیزیم برگ، تیمار H200 بیشترین مقدار آهن و روی برگ، تیمارهای H200 و P25H150 بیشترین مقدار منگنز برگ و تیمار P25H150 بیشترین مقدار مس برگ را داشت.این تحقیق نشان داد با تیمار P50H100 می‌توان به بیشترین عملکرد معنی‌دار دست یافت. بعد از این تیمار، تیمارهای H200 و P25H150 نتایج معنی‌داری داشت و مناسب بود. تیمارهای P100 و P50 و همچنین تیمار H100 و P25H50 نتایج معنی‌داری نسبت به تیمارهای برتر نداشتند. استفاده همزمان لئوناردیت با فسفر نتایج بیشتر و معنی‌داری نسبت به کاربرد فسفر به صورت تنهایی داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of phosphate and humic fertilizers on quantitative, qualitative and nutritional indicators of safflower plant leaves.

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahsa abedi 1
  • jalil Shafagh 2
  • Saeid Zehtab Salmasi 3
  • arash hemati 4
1 Master's student in Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assoc. Prof., of thr Dept. of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Center for Sustainable Agriculture Studies, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of New Mexico, USA
4 CEO of Qizil Topraq Sahand Company, Maragheh, Iran
چکیده [English]

This research was conducted in order to reduce or replace phosphate fertilizer with humic acid to investigate growth characteristics, grain yield and absorption of macro and micronutrients in safflower plants in order to reduce costs and increase the harvest.
Cultivation of safflower of Goldasht variety with 9treatments were carried out a randomized complete block design. Morphological, vegetative growth and Yield traits and nutrients were measured in safflower leaves.
The P50H100 treatment had the highest values in plant height, stem diameter, number of main branches, photosynthesis, chlorophyll index, stomatal conductance, capitol number, 100-grain weight, seed yield, biological yield, harvest index, oil percentage and oil yield. After P50H100treatment, H200andP25H150 treatments had better results in these indicators. P50H100treatment has the highest significant percentage of leaf nitrogen, P50H100and P50treatment has the highest significant percentage of leaf phosphorus, H200, P25H150and P50H100treatments have the highest significant amount of leaf potassium, H200treatment has the highest significant amount of leaf calcium, P25H150treatment has the highest significant amount of leaf magnesium, H200 treatment has the highest significant amount of iron and zinc in leaves, The H200 and P25H150 treatments had the highest significant amount of leaf manganese and the P25H150 treatment had the highest significant amount of leaf copper.
This research showed that the most significant performance can be achieved with P50H100 treatment. After this treatment, H200 and P25H150 treatments had significant results and were appropriate. P100 and P50 treatments as well as H100 and P25H50 treatments did not have significant results compared to the superior treatments.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • humic acid
  • phosphorus
  • safflower
  • leaf elements
  • oil percentage
  • seed yield
  1. Ahmadpour Abnavi S, Ramroudi M and Galavi M. 2019. Effect of biological and chemical phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under low irrigation condition. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29 (1): 269-284. (In Persian).

    Aminifard MH, Aroiee H, Nemati H, Azizi M and Hawa ZE. 2012. Fulvic acid affects pepper antioxidant activity and fruit quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(68), 13179-13185, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.1507.

    AOCS. 1993. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 4th edn. (Methods Ag 1–65 and Ce 1–62). Champaign, IL: American Oil Chemists’ Society Press.

    Asri F, O,Dimirtas EI and Ari N. 2015. Changes in Fruit Yield, QualitY and nutrient Concentrations in response to soil humic acid applications in processing tomato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21 (No 3) 2015, 585-591.

    Berti M, Wilckens R, Fischer S, Solis A, Johnson B. 2011. Seeding date influence on camelina seed yield, yield components, and oil content in Chile, Industrial Crops and Products, 34: 1358-1365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.008.

    Brannon CA, Sommers LE. 1985. Preparation and characterization of model humic polymers containing organic phosphorus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 17: 213–219.

    Castro TAVTD, Berbara RLL, Tavares OCH, Mello DFDG, Pereira EG, Souza CDCBD, Espinosa LM and García AC. 2021. Humic acids induce a eustress state via photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism leading to a root growth improvement in rice plants, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 162, 2021: 171-184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.043.

    Ebrahimian A and Soleymani A. 2013.Growth length and dry matter yield in different stages of safflower as affected by nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4 (5): 963-969.

    EL-Sayed SAA, Hellal FA and Mohamed KAS. 2014. Effect of Humic acid and phosphate sources on nutrient composition and yield of Radish grown in calcareous soil. Plant Nutrition Dept., National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt. 179.

    Emongor VE and Emongor RA. 2023.  Chapter 24 - Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), Editor(s): Muhammad arooq, Kadambot H.M. Siddique, Neglected and Underutilized Crops, Academic Press. 683-731, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90537-4.00024-7.

    Golizadeh A, Kamali K, Fathipour Y, Abbasipour H. 2009. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 11: 115-124.

    Hopkins B and Ellsworth J. 2003. Phosphorus nutrition on potato production. Idaho Potato Conference. 22-23.

     Izhar Shafi M, Adnan M, Fahad S, Wahid F, Khan A, Yue Z, Danish S, Zafar-ul H, Brtnicky M and Datta R. 2020. Application of Single Superphosphate with Humic Acid Improves the Growth, Yield and Phosphorus Uptake of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Calcareous Soil. 7-10, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091224.

    1. da Silva C, da Silva AC, Zoz T, Victor B, Toppa E, Silva PB and Zanotto MD. 2015. Genetic divergence among accessions of Carthamus tinctorius L. by morphoagronomic traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research10 (25): 4825-4830, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9859.

    Jalilian, J, and Heydarzadeh S. 2015. The effect of cover plants, organic and chemical fertilizers on the qualitative and qualitative characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25 (4): 71-85. (In Persian).

    Karakurt Y, Unlu H and Padem H. 2009. The influence of foliar and soli fertiizationn of humic acid on yeild and quality of pepper. Plant soil Science, 59(3): 233-237.

    Khaled H and Fawy HA. 2011. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Research, 6: 21-29, https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2010-SWR.

     Khan A, Guramni AR, Khan MZ, Hussain F, Akhtar ME and Khan S. 2012. Effect of humic acid on growth, yield, nutrient composition, photosynthetic pigment and total sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum L). Journal of The Chemical Society of Pakistan, 6: 56-63.

    Kharwara PC, and Bindra AD. 1992. Effect of nitrogen and plant population on growth, uptake of nutrients and oil yield of spring sunflower (Helianthus annus). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37: 390-398.

    Liu Y, Zhang K, Zhang H, Zhou K, Chang Y, Zhan Y, Pan C, Shi X,  Zuo H, Li J and  Wei Y. 2023. Humic acid and phosphorus fractions transformation regulated by carbon-based materials in composting steered its potential for phosphorus mobilization in soil, Journal of Environmental Management. 0301-4797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116553.

    Maghferati Nayebi R. 2015. Evaluation of some physiological and agronomic traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in reaction to nitrogen fertilizer and lack of water. Senior thesis. Tabriz University. Tabriz. Iran. (In Persian).

    Marsac R, Catrouillet C, Davranche M, Bouhnik-Le Coz M, Briant N, Janot N, Otero-Fariña A, Groenenberg J, Pédrot M and  Dia A. 2021. Modeling rare earth elements binding to humic acids with model VII, Chemical Geology, 567: 120099, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120099.

    Morard P, Eyheraguibel B, Morard M and Silvestre J. 2010. Direct effects of humic-like substance on growth, water, and mineral nutrition of various species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34: 46-59.

    Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A and Vianello A. 2002. ”Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants”, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34: 1527-1536..

    Nikolic M, Cesco S, Romheld V, Varanini Z and Pinton R. 2003. Uptake of iron (Fe-59) complexed to waterextract able humic substances by sunflower leaves. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26: 2243-2252.

    Poozeshi R, Zabihi HR, Ramezani Mogadam MR, Rajabzadeh M, Mokhtari A. 2011. The effect of foliar spraying on zinc, humic acid and Acetic acid on yield, yield components and concentration of elements in Pikani grapes. Journal of Horticultural Sciences (Agricultural Sciences and Industries), 25 (3): 351-354. (In Persian).

    Ryan J, Estefan J and Rashid A. 2001. Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual. Jointly published by the International Centre Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria and National Agric. Res. Centre (NARC), Islamabad.

    Saentho A, Wisawapipat W, Lawongsa P, Aramrak S, Prakongkep N and  Klysubun W. 2022. Iso Christl, Speciation and pH- and particle size-dependent solubility of phosphorus in tropical sandy soils, Geoderma, 408: 0016-706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115590.

    Sanchez A, Sanchez-Anderu J, Juarez M, Jorda J and Bermudez D. 2002. Humic substances and amino acid improve effectiveness of Chelate feEDDHA in Lemons trees. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 2433-2442, https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120014705.

    Sanchez–Sanchez A, Sanchez–Andreu J, Juarez M, Jorda J and Bermudez D. 2006. Imporvement of iron uptake in table grape by addition of humic substancecs. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 29(2): 259-272.

    Silva MSRA, Tavares OCH, Ribeiro TG, Silva CSRA, Silva CSRAG, Baldani JM, García AC, Berbara RLL and Jesus EC. 2021. Humic acids enrich the plant microbiota with bacterial candidates for the suppression of pathogens, Applied Soil Ecology. 168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104146.

    Takahashi Y and  Katoh M. 2023. Root response and phosphorus uptake with enhancement in available phosphorus level in soil in the presence of water-soluble organic matter deriving from organic material, Journal of Environmental Management: 0301-4797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116038.

    Varanini Z and Pinton R.  2001. Direct versus indirect effects of soil humic substances on plant growth and nutrition. PP. 141-157. In: Pinton, R., Varanini Z. and Nannipieri, P. (Eds.), the Rhizosphere, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Yadollahi P, Asgharipour MR, Kheiri N and Ghaderi A. 2015. Effects of drought stress and different types of organic fertilizers on the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J. Oil Plant Product. 1: 29-40. (In Persian).

    Yang F, Sui L, Tang C, Li J, Cheng K and Xue Q. 2021. Sustainable advances on phosphorus utilization in soil via addition of biochar and humic substances, Science of The Total Environment, 768: 145106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145106.

    Yi X, Yu L, Chang S H E, Yin C, Wang H and Zhang Z. 2021. The effects of China’s Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer (OSCF) policy on greenhouse vegetable farmers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 297: 126677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126677.

    Yuan Y, Gai S, Tang C, Jin Y, Cheng K, Antonietti M and Yang F. 2022. Artificial humic acid improves maize growth and soil phosphorus utilization efficiency, Applied Soil Ecology, 179: 104587, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104587.

    Zeynali A. 1999. Safflower (identification, production and consumption). Publications of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 144. (In Persian).

    Zhou L, Yan Y, Wang Y, Wu Q, Yan J and Pei J. 2023. Research progresses and prospects of medicated oil dual-purpose crop safflower based on patent mining, Oil Crop Science. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocsci.2022.10.001.

    Acosta-Callegos J A and Adams M W. 1991. Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under drought stress. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 117: 213-219.

    Ahmadpour Abnavi S, Ramroudi M and Galavi M. 2019. Effect of biological and chemical phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under low irrigation condition. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 29 (1): 269-284. (In Persian).

    Khoram Ghahfarokhi A, Rahimi A, Torabi B, Maddah Hosseini SH. 2018. Effects of Soil Application of Humic Acid and Foliar Applications on Yield, Yield Component and Oil Content of Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.). Journal of Crop Production 11(1): 37-39. (In Persian).