واکنش عملکرد دانه‌ی جو و باقلا به محلول‌پاشی اسید هیومیک در الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علمی کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علمی کشاورزی- دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

اهداف: این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی عملکرد دانه‌ی جو و باقلا در الگوهای مختلف کشت مخلوط در شرایط کاربرد اسیدهیومیک در یک سیستم کشت کم‌نهاده اجرا گردید.
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل دو عاملی (5×3) بر پایه طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار در شهرستان شادگان اجرا شد. عامل اول شامل پنج الگوی کاشت شامل دو تیمار کشت خالص جو و باقلا و سه الگوی کشت مخلوط (50 درصد باقلا + 50 درصد جو، 80 درصد باقلا + 40 درصد جو و 40 درصد باقلا +80 درصد جو) و عامل دوم محلول‌پاشی اسید هیومیک شامل تیمار شاهد، غلظت سه درصد اسید هیومیک و غلظت شش درصد اسید هیومیک بود.
یافته‌ها: بیشترین تعداد دانه در غلاف و غلاف در بوته در کشت خالص باقلا به دست آمد که با کشت مخلوط اختلاف معنی‌داری نداشت. بیشترین عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک باقلا در کشت خالص به دست آمد. کمترین عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک باقلا در تیمار کشت مخلوط با کمترین تراکم باقلا به دست آمد. با کاهش تراکم باقلا از 100 درصد به 40 درصد عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک باقلا کاهش یافتند. بیشترین عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک جو نیز در تیمار کشت خالص بدست آمد. با محلول‌پاشی اسید هیومیک ، عملکرد دانه‌ی باقلا و عملکرد دانه‌ی جو افزایش یافت. نسبت برابری زمین برای هر سه الگوی کشت مخلوط بیشتر از یک به دست آمد. مزیت مالی نیز برای هر سه الگوی کشت مخلوط مثبت بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Response of grain yield of barley and faba bean to humic acid application in different planting patterns of intercropping

نویسندگان [English]

  • kamyar kazemi 1
  • Hamdollah Eskandari 2
1 Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University,Tehran,Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agriulture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study was aimed to evaluate the grain yield of barley and faba bean in different planting patterns of intercropping under the condition of humic acid application in a low input cropping system.
The experiment was carried out as a two-factor factorial baed on RCBD with three replications. The treatments were five planting patterns including two treatments of barley and faba bean sole croppings and three intercropping patterns and three foliar applications of humic acid
Based on the obtained results, the highest number of grain per pod and pods per plant was obtained in the sole cropping of beans, which was not significantly different from the intercropping The highest grain yield and biological yield of faba beans were obtained in sole cropping .The lowest seed yield and biological yield of faba beans were obtained in the intercropping pattern with the lowest density of faba beans. By reducing the density of faba beans from 100% to 40% the grain and biological yield of faba beans decreased. The highest grain and biological yields of barley were also obtained in the sole cropping treatment respectively humic acid foliar application, faba bean yield increased and barley yield increased The land equivalent ratio for all three intercropping patterns was obtained more than one. The monetary advantage index was also positive for all three mixed cropping patterns.
In total and based on the evaluation criteria, the best pattern was the intercropping of 80% of faba beans and 40% of barley

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Land equivalent ratio
  • Monetary advantage index
  • Organic fertilizer
  • Shading
  • intercropping

مراجع

Abd-Rabboh AMK, Ghazy NA, Awad MM and Farahat GA. 2020. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and foliar spraying with humic acid on productivity of maize, soybean and ear rot disease of maize. Journal of Plant Production, 11: 1045-1054. https://doi.org/ 10.21608/jpp.2020.122663
Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A abd Sinebo W. 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25: 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002
Ampong K, Thilakaranthna MS and Gorim LY .2022. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Frontiers in Agronomy, 4:848621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.848621
Aslani S, Barzegar T, Nikbakht J. 2019. Effect of foliar application of humic acid on growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (L.) Mill) under deficit irrigation stress. Plant Process and Function, 8 (32): 69-84. (In Persian).
Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou, IB abd Doras CA. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100:249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008
Eskandari H and Javanmard A. 2013. Evaluation of Forage Yield and Quality in Intercropping Patterns of Maize (Zea mays) and Cow pea (Vigna sinensis). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 23(4): 101-110. (In Persian).
Eskandari H and Kazemi K. 2015. Ecological Role of Faba bean (Vicia Faba) in Agronomical Systems. Proceedings of the 1th national Conference on Research in Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems. Tehran, Iran. Pp. 1-6.
Eskandari H and Kazemi K. 2020. Response of grain yield and water use efficiency of wheat and faba bean to partial root-zone irrigation in intercropping. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 13(3): 777-792. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2020.2267.1579
Ghaderimokri L, Rezaei‑Chiyaneh, E, Ghiyasi M, Gheshlaghi M, Battaglia ML and Siddique KHM. 2022. Application of humic acid and biofertilizers changes oil and phenolic compounds of fennel and fenugreek in intercropping systems. Scientific Reports. 12: 5946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09645-4
Ghosh PK. 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research. 88: 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.015
Habibi Sharafabad Z, Abdipour M, Hosseinifarahi M, Kelidari A and Rashidi L. 2022. Integrated humic acid and vermicomposting changes essential oil quantity, and quality in field-grown Lavandula angustifolia L. intercropped with Brassica nigra L. Industrials Crop & Products. 178: 114635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114635
Haji Ramezani F, Barmaki M, Dashti G and Dabagh Mohamadi Nasab A. 2023. Evaluate the Competitiveness and Usefulness of Potato and Local Faba Bean Intercropping in the Sarab City. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 1(33): 251-267. https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.50023.2819s
Li Y, Fang F, Wei J, Wu X, Cui R, Li G, Zheng F and Tan D. 2019. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: A three-Year experiment. Scientific Report, 9: 12014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48620-4
Mojtabaie M and Norouzi SH. 2017. Evaluation of Different Intercropping Patterns of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) through Competitive and Economic Indices. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 7: 145-158. https://doi.org/ 10.29252/jcpp.7.3.145
Nasrollah-zadeh S, Ghassemi-Golezani K and Raey Y. 2011. Effect of shading on rate and duration of grain filling and yield of faba bean cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 3(21): 47-56. (In Persian)
Noroozisharaf A and Kaviani M. 2018. Effect of soil application of humic acid on nutrients uptake, essential oil and chemical compositions of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under greenhouse conditions. Physiological and Molecular Biology of Plants, 24: 423-421.
Nouryani H. 2021. Evaluation of some eco-physiological properties of maize S.C 704 in additive intercropping with mungbean. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30: 45-58. https://www.doi.org/10.22034/saps.2020.12291
Nurgi N, Tana T, Dechassa N, Alemayehu Y AND Tesso B. 2023. Effects of planting density and variety on productivity of maize-faba bean intercropping system. Helyon, 9: 12967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12967
Olaetxea M, Mora V, Baigorri R, Zamarreno AM and Garcia-Mina JM. 2020. The singular molecular conformation of humic acids in solution influences their ability to enhance root hydraulic conductivity and plant growth. Molecules, 26: 7–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010003
Omrani B, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab A, Shakiba MR, Amini R. 2022. Evaluation of Yield and Advantage in Intercropping of Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) with Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Vetch (Vicia villosa L.) under Regular and Magnetic Water Irrigation. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 3(32): 63-78. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/saps.2021.48830.2765
Roudgarnezhad S, Sam Deliri M, Mousavi Mirkalaie AA and Neshaee Moghaddam M. 2018. The effect of spraying humic acid on some morphological and physiological traits of bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Plant Environmental Physiology, 49:33-42. (In Persian).
Sarhadi J, Heidari S, and Sharif M. 2021. Effect of chemical fertilizers and plant biostimulants on yield and some characteristics of citrus sinensis, var.valencia leaves and fruits in the southern Kerman province. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 4: 133-146. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/saps.2021.43971.2608
Senghor Y, Balde A, Manga GB, Affholder F, Lethourmy P, Bassene C, Kanfany G, Ndiave M, Couedel A, Leroux L and Falconnier GN. 2023. Intercropping millet with low-density cowpea improves millet productivity for low and medium N input in semi-arid central Senegal. Helyon, 9: 17680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17680
Shen L, Wang X, Liu T, Wei W, Zhang S, Keyhani AB, Li L and Zhang W. 2023. Border row effects on the distribution of root and soil resources in maize–soybean strip intercropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research. 233: 150812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105812
Thabih V and Saeedipour S. 2022. Study of the effect of growing barley-faba bean on weed control and their yield. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 13: 79-90. https://doi.org/ 10.22067/ijpr.v13i2.2111-1015
Tourfi F and Shokuhfar A. 2019. Effect of humic acid on yield, yield components and physiological parameters of wheat in deficit irrigation conditions. Journal of Plant Production, 9: 121-132. (In Persian).
Wang Z, Zhao X, Wu P, Chen X. 2015. Effects of water limitation on yield advantage and water use in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) strip intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 71: 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.007
Xiong Q, Wang S, Lu X, Xu Y, Zhang L, Chen X, Xu G, Tian D, Zhang L, Jing J and Ye X. 2023. The effective combination of humic acid phosphate fertilizer regulating the form transformation of phosphorus and the chemical and microbial mechanism of its phosphorus availability.  Agronomy, 13:1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061581
Zhang ZM, Yang W, Li Y, Zhao Q and Dong Y. 2023. Wheat–faba bean intercropping can control Fusarium wilt in faba bean under F. commune and ferulic acid stress as revealed by histopathological analysis. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 124: 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.101965
Zhu L, He J, Tuan Y, Li X, Wang F, Qin K and Wang J. 2022. Intercropping Wolfberry with Gramineae plants improves productivity and soil quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 292: 110632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110632
دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار
دوره 34، شماره 3
آبان 1403
صفحه 19-34

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار