استفاده از روش‌های پارامتری، ناپارامتری و شاخص SIIG به‌منظور بررسی برهمکنش ژنوتیپ × محیط و پایداری عملکرد دانه هیبریدهای جدید آفتابگردان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج

2 دانشیار، موسسه تحقیقات، اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

3 محقق، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،

4 استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج

5 عضو هیأت علمی مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

10.22034/saps.2024.62530.3252

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف: هدف از این مطالعه، بررسی اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط و تعیین پایداری عملکرد و سازگاری هبیریدهای جدید آفتابگردان بود.
 
مواد و روش‌ها: در این بررسی، تعداد 18 هیبرید به همراه رقم زرین در شریط بدون تنش، تنش شوری و خشکی در چهار ایستگاه‌ تحقیقاتی (بروجرد، گرگان، گنبد و اصفهان) در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی 1401-1400 مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. در این پژوهش برای بررسی اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط و تعیین پایداری عملکرد هبیریدهای جدید آفتابگردان از روش‌های پارامتری، ناپارامتری و شاخص SIIG استفاده شد. در زمان رسیدگی محصول عملکرد دانه برای هر ژنوتیپ در هر محیط اندازه‌گیری گردید.
 
نتایج: نتایج تجزیه مرکب عملکرد دانه نشان داد که اثرات محیط، ژنوتیپ و اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط معنی‌دار بود. معنی‌دار بودن اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط، بیانگر واکنش متفاوت ژنوتیب‌ها در محیط‌های مختلف بود و بنابراین، امکان تجزیه پایداری ژنوتیپ‌ها وجود داشت. بر اساس نتایج تجزیه پایداری با روش ابرهارت و راسل، ژنوتیپ‌های H14، H10 و H1 با عملکرد بالاتر از میانگین و ضریب رگرسیون نزدیک به یک به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های با سازگاری عمومی بالا برای تمام مناطق شناخته شدند. بر اساس روش گزینش همزمان برای عملکرد و پایداری (YSi)، ژنوتیپ‌های H1،  H4و H10 با کمترین مقادیر به‌عنوان پایدارترین و ژنوتیپ‌های H3،  H9و H6 با بیشترین مقدار آماره‌ مذکور به‌عنوان ناپایدارترین ژنوتیپ‌ها شناسایی شدند. همچنین بر اساس شاخص SIIG، ژنوتیپ‌های H1، H4، H2، H10، H12 و H16 با داشتن مقدار SIIG بالا و همچنین عملکرد دانه بالاتر از میانگین به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های برتر از نظر پایداری و عملکرد دانه شناخته شدند.
 
نتیجه‌گیری: به­طور کلی نتایج نشان داد که ژنوتیپ‌های H1، H4، H2، H10، H12 و H16 از نظر هر دو عامل پایداری و میانگین عملکرد دانه، ژنوتیپ‌های برتر این آزمایش بودند و می‌توان از آن‌ها برای انجام آزمایشات بیشتر از جمله آزمایشات سازگاری استفاده نمود.
 
واژه‌های کلیدی: اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط، آفتابگردان، پایداری عمومی، روش ابرهارت و راسل، شاخص SIIG

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Using parametric, non-parametric and SIIG index methods to study the genotype × environment interaction and seed yield stability of new sunflower hybrids

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Gholizadeh 1
  • Mehdi Ghaffari 2
  • Hossein Ahmadi-Ochtapeh 1
  • Morad Cheshmehnoor 3
  • Gholam Hossein Shiresmaeili 4
  • farnaz shariati 5
1 Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran
2 Associate Prof. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
3 Researcher, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Khoramabad, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Isfahan, Iran
5 Faculty member of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the genotype × environment interaction and determine the yield stability of new sunflower hybrids.
 
Materials and Methods: In this study, 18 hybrids along with the Zarin cultivar were evaluated under non stress, salinity and drought stress conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replications in four experimental field stations (Boroujerd, Gorgan, Gonbad and Isfahan) during 2022-2023 cropping season. In this study, parametric, non-parametric methods, and SIIG index were used to investigate the genotype × environment interaction and determine the yield stability of new sunflower hybrids. Plants were harvested at maturity and then the seed yield was recorded for each genotype at each test environment.
 
Results: Results of combined analysis of variance indicated that the effects of environments, genotypes, and genotype × environment interaction were significant, suggesting that the genotypes responded differently in the studied environment conditions. So, there was the possibility of stability analysis. According to stability analysis using the Eberhart and Russel method, the H14, H10 and H1 genotypes with higher seed yield than the overall mean and regression coefficient equal one (bi=1) were identified as the genotypes with high general stability for all regions. Based on the simultaneous selection method for yield and stability (YSi), the genotypes H1, H4, and H10 with the lowest values were stable, whereas genotypes H3, H9, and H6 with the highest values were unstable. Also, based on the SIIG index, the genotypes H1, H4, H2, H10, H12, and H16 having high SIIG values as well as higher seed yield than the total average was recognized as superior genotypes from the point of stability and seed yield.
 
Conclusion: Generally, the results indicated that hybrids H1, H4, H2, H10, H12 and H16 were superior genotypes for seed yield and stability in this study. Therefore, these hybrids can be used for further testing, including adaptation tests.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broad Adaptability
  • Eberhart and Russel method
  • Genotype×Environment Interaction
  • Sunflower
  • SIIG index

مراجع

Abyar S, Navabpour S, Karimizadeh R, Nasrollahnejad ghomi AA, Kiani GH and Gholizadeh A. 2021. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and grain yield stability of different bread wheat genotypes using non-parametric methods. Cereal Research, 11(2): 89-104. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22124/cr.2021.20461.1687.
Ahmadi J, Vaezi B and Pour-Aboughadareh A. 2016. Evaluation of forage yield stability of advanced lines of grass pea (Lathyrus sativa L.) by parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8: 149-159. (In Persian). DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.159.
Ahmadpour S, Darvishzadeh R, Sofalian O and Hatamzadeh H. 2019. Evaluation of yield stability of sunflower inbred lines under salt stress conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11: 1-10. (In Persian). DOI: 10.29252/jcb.11.30.1.
Akbari S, Akbarpour O and Pezeshkpour P. 2022. Evaluation of grain yield stability of lentil genotypes using parametric methods in rainfed conditions of khorramabad. Journal of Crop Breeding, 14(44): 227-238. (In Persian). DOI: 10.52547/jcb.14.44.227.
Akbarpour O, Dehghani H and Sorkhi-Lalehloo B. 2012. Study of grain yield stability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) promising lines in cold regions of Iran using regression methods. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 14: 155-170. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.15625540.1391.14.2.5.8.
Alishah O, MahmoodJanloo H, Hekmat MH, Naderi Arefi A, Sidmasoomi SY and Talat F. 2019. Investigation of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability of hopeful cotton (G. hirsutum L.) genotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11: 226-236. (In Persian). DOI: 10.29252/jcb.11.31.226.
Alizadeh B, Rezaizad A, Yazdandoost Hamedani M, Shiresmaeili G, Nasserghadimi F, Khademhamzeh HR and Gholizadeh A. 2021a. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in winter rapeseed cultivars and lines using multivariate method of additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 11(1):95-108. (In Persian). DOI: 10.47176/jcpp.11.1.36131.
Alizadeh B, Rezaizad A, Yazdandoost Hamedani M, Shiresmaeili G, Nasserghadimi F and Khademhamzeh HR. 2021b. Investigation of genotype × environment interaction and seed yield stability of rapeseed genotypes in cold and mild cold regions of Iran. Plant Genetic Researches, 7(2): 65-82. (In Persian). DOI: 10.52547/pgr.7.2.6.
Alizadeh B, Rezaizad A, Yazdandoost Hamedani M, Shiresmaeili G, Nasserghadimi F, Khademhamzeh HR and Gholizadeh A. 2022. Genotype × environment interactions and simultaneous selection for high seed yield and stability in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus) multi-environment trials. Agricultural Research, 11(2): 185-196. DOI: 10.1007/s40003-021-00565-9.
Alizadeh B, Rezaizad A, Yazdandoost Hamedani M, Shiresmaeili G, Nasserghadimi F, Khademhamzeh HR and Gholizadeh A. 2020. Evaluation of seed yield stability of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes using non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 202-212. (In Persian). DOI: 10.52547/jcb.12.35.202.
Becker H and Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101: 1-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523. 1988.tb00261.x
Dorrani-Nejad M and Mohammadi-Nejad G. 2018. Stability analysis for seed yield in different fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) ecotypes using Eberhart-Russel regression and different univariate statistics methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10: 19-27. (In Persian). DOI: 10.29252/jcb.10.25.19.
Ebadi A, Sabaghpour SH, Dehghani H and Kamrani M. 2008. Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 162: 221-229. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9552-x.
Eberhart ST and Russell W. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x.
Farshadfar E and Sutka J. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 54: 459-467. DOI: 10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.4.8.
Finlay K and Wilkinson G. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742.
Fooladvand M, Shahsavand H, Mohamadinejad G and Parvizi M. 2013. Genotype by environment interaction and study of sugar yield stability in the sugarcane cultivars in Khuzestan locations by stability criteria. Cereal Research, 2: 31-44. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.22520163.1391.2.1.3.3.
Francis T and Kannenberg L. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 1029-1034. DOI: 10.4141/cjps78-157.
Ghaffari M, Farrokhi E, Rahmanpour S, Daneshian J, Nouri Rad Davaji AM, Rezaeizad A, Zarei Siahbidi A, Soltani M, Kazerani N, Andarkhor AA, Ravanlou AA, Khiyavi M, Homayonifar M, Shasavari MR, Shariati F, Shiresmaeeli GH, Nasser Ghadimi F and Yazdandoost M. 2019. Shams, new medium maturity sunflower hybrid adapted to spring cropping in temperate and cold regions and summer cropping in temperate regions of Iran. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops, 7(2): 221-233. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22092/rafhc.2019.110790.1076.
Ghaffari M, Gholizadeh A, Andarkhor S A, Zareei Siahbidi َ, Kalantar Ahmadi S A, Shariati and Rezaeizad A. 2022. Evaluation of seed yield stability of sunflower genotypes using non-parametric statistics. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 12(1) :1-13. (In Persian). DOI: 10.47176/jcpp.12.1.36104.
Ghaffari M, Gholizadeh A, Andarkhor SA, Zareei Siahbidi A, Kalantar Ahmadi SA, Shariati F and Rezaeizad A. 2021. Stability and genotype × environment analysis of oil yield of sunflower single cross hybrids in diverse environments of Iran. Euphytica, 217(10): 187. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-021-02921-w.
Gholizadeh A, Khodadadi M and Sharifi-Zagheh A. 2022. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction for essential oil yield of coriander genotypes under different irrigation conditions using GGE biplot method. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 15(1): 43-52. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22077/escs.2020.3574.1878.
Huehn, M. 1979. Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med Biol, 10: 112-117.
Hühn M and Léon J. 1995. Nonparametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agronomy Journal, 87: 627-632. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700040004x.
Jafari M, Asghari ZR, Alizadeh B, Sofalian O and Zare N. 2015. Study of seed yield stability in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes using Eberhart and Russell’s method. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 45: 585-592. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22059/IJFCS.2014.53568.
Jamshidmoghaddam M and Pourdad SS. 2013. Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran. Euphytica, 190: 357-369. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-012-0776-z.
Kang M. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communication, 16: 113-115.
Karimizadeh R, Safikhani Nasimi M, Mohammadi M, Seyyedi F, Mahmoodi A and Rostami B. 2008. Determining rank and stability of lentil genotypes in rainfed condition by nonparametric statistics. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 12: 93-102. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.24763594.1387.12.43.9.2.
MINITAB INC. 2005. Minitab user’s guide, vers. 14. Minitab Inc, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
Moghaddaszadeh M, Asghari Zakaria R, Hassanpanah D and Zare N. 2018. Non-parametric stability analysis of tuber yield in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotype. Journal of Crop Breeding, 28: 50-63. (In Persian). DOI: 10.29252/jcb.10.28.50.
Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R, Hosseinpour T, Ghojogh H, Shahbazi K and Sharifi P. 2018. Use of parametric and non-parametric methods for genotype × environment interaction analysis in bread wheat genotypes. Plant Genetic Researches, 4: 75-88. (In Persian). DOI: 10.29252/pgr.4.2.75.
Mortazavian S, Nikkhah H, Hassani F, Sharif AHM, Taheri M and Mahlooji M. 2014. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16: 609-622. DOI: 20.1001.1.16807073.2014.16.3.5.3.
Movahhedi Z, Dehghani H and Mofidian M. 2010. A study of yield stability in cold region ecotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) through non-parametric measures. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 40: 103-111. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.20084811.1388.40.4.10.8.
Najafi Mirak T, Dastfal M, Andarzian B, Farzadi H, Bahari M and Zali H. 2018. Assessment of non-parametric methods in selection of stable genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 20: 126-138 (In Persian). (In Persian). DOI: ‎ 20.1001.1.15625540.1397.20.2.3.8.
Nassar R and Huehn M. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43: 45-53. DOI: 10.2307/2531947.
Nowosad K, Liersch A, Popławska W and Bocianowski J. 2016. Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica, 208: 187-194. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1620-z.
Pinthus JM. 1973. Estimate of genotype value: a proposed method. Euphytica, 22: 121-123. DOI: 10.1007/BF00021563.
Plaisted R and Peterson L. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Journal of Potato Research, 36: 381-385. DOI: 10.1007/BF02852735.
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Yousefian M, Moradkhani H, Poczai P, Kadambot H and Siddique M. 2019. STABILITYSOFT: A new online program to calculate parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applications in Plant Sciences, 7(1): e01211. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1211.
Pourdad S, Moghaddam M, Faraji A and Naraki H. 2014. Study on different non-parametric stability methods on seed yield of spring rapeseed varieties and hybrids. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 44: 539-548. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22059/IJFCS.2013.50326.
Ramzi E, Asghari A, Sofalian O, Mehraban A and Ebadi A. 2020. Evaluation of grain yield stability and genotype- environment interaction of barley promising lines in warm and humid regions of the country. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(36), 57-65. (In Persian). DOI: 10.52547/jcb.12.36.57.
Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H and Sabaghpour SH. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science, 46: 1100-1106. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122.
SAS Inc. 2011. Base SAS 9.1 procedures guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Sheikh F, Sharifi H, Asteraki H, Miri K and Sekhavat R. 2021. Evaluation stability of seed yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes by parametric and non-parametric methods. Crop Production, 14(3): 125-144. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22069/EJCP.2022.18908.2411.
Shukla G. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245. (In Persian). DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1972.87.
SPSS Inc. 2010. SPSS 20. Users Guied. Chicago, USA.
Thennarasu K. 1995. On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability. Dissertation, University of New Delhi
Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Armion M, Mehraban A, Hossein-Pour T and Dorii M. 2017. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran. Cereal Research Communications, 45: 500-511. DOI: 10.1556/0806.45.2017.019.
Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Mehraban A, Hossein-Pour T, Koohkan E, Ghasemi S, Moradkhani H and Siddique KH. 2019. Integrating different stability models to investigate genotype× environment interactions and identify stable and high-yielding barley genotypes. Euphytica, 215: 63. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-019-2386-5.
Wachira F, Ng'etich W, Omolo J and Mamati G. 2002. Genotype × environment interactions for tea yields. Euphytica, 127: 289-297. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020273616349.
Wricke G. 1962. Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Zeitschr F Pflanzenz 47: 92-96. DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2020.101003.
Zali H, Hasanloo T, Sofalian O, Asghari A and Zeinalabedini M. 2016. Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 77-90. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.22286128.1395.8.20.7.4.
Zali H, Sofalian O, Hasanloo T, Asgharii A and Hoseini SMM. 2015. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique: Introduction of new method. Biological Forum–An International Journal, 7(2): 703-711. DOI: 10.3390/plants12091843.
دانش کشاورزی وتولید پایدار
دوره 36، شماره 1
1405
صفحه 303-319

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار