بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گلرنگ (Carthamus tinctorius) در کشت مخلوط افزایشی با بالنگوی شهری (Lallemantia iberica)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز.

2 گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

3 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد میاندوآب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، میاندوآب، ایران

4 رشته اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز.

چکیده

اهداف: این پژوهش به‌منظور بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گلرنگ و نسـبت برابـری زمـین در کشـت مخلـوط افزایشی گلرنگ و بالنگوی شهری است.
مواد و روشها: کشت مخلوط بر اساس سری‌های افزایشی انجام شد که گلرنگ گیاه اصلی و بالنگوی شهری گیاه فرعی می‌باشد. طرح پایه آزمایشی در قالب بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار بود. الگوهای مختلف کشت شامل کشت خالص گلرنگ، کشت 100درصد گلرنگ همراه با کشت بالنگوی شهری با تراکم 15 درصد، کشت 100درصد گلرنگ همراه با کشت بالنگوی شهری با تراکم 30 درصد، کشت 100درصد گلرنگ همراه با کشت بالنگوی شهری با تراکم 45 درصد، کشت 100درصد گلرنگ همراه با کشت بالنگوی شهری با تراکم 60 درصد، کشت 100درصد گلرنگ همراه با کشت بالنگوی شهری با تراکم 75 درصد بود. در این پژوهش صفات گلرنگ شامل تعداد طبق در بوته، تعداد دانه در طبق، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیکی اندازه‌گیری شدند.
یافته‌ها: اثر الگوهای مختلف کشت بر تعداد دانه در طبق و وزن دانه غیرمعنی‌دار ولی بر تعداد طبق در بوته، عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیکی معنی‌دار بود. بیشترین تعداد دانه در طبق مربوط به الگوی کشت مخلوط ۱۰۰:۳۰ (بالنگوی‌شهری-گلرنگ) و بیشترین عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیکی به کشت خالص گلرنگ تعلق بالاترین نسبت برابری زمین به کشت مخلوط ۱۰۰:۳۰ (بالنگوی‌شهری-گلرنگ) تعلق داشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: می توان الگوهای کشت ۱۰۰:۳۰ (بالنگوی‌شهری-گلرنگ) را به علت دارا بودن عملکرد دانه، عملکرد بیولوژیکی و سودمندی اقتصادی بیشتر به عنوان الگوی کشت مناسب مخلوط پیشنهاد نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius ) in intercropping with dragon head (Lallemantia iberica)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jalil Shafagh kolvanagh 1
  • Safar Nasrollahzadeh 2
  • Farshad Sorkhi 3
  • Mohamad ghaderi 4
1 Dept of Plant Eco-physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, university of Tabriz, Iran
2 Dept of Plant Eco-physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, university of Tabriz, Iran
3 Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Miandoab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miandoab, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and Objective: This research aims to investigate the yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) in intercropping with dragon head (Lallemantia iberica).
Materials and Methods: Mixed cropping was done based on increasing series, where Carthamus tinctorius is the main plant and Lallemantia iberica is the Sub plant. The basic design of the experiment was in the form of randomized complete blocks with four replications. Different cultivation patterns include pure Carthamus tinctorius cultivation, 100% Carthamus tinctorius with 15% Lallemantia iberica, 100% Carthamus tinctorius with 30% Lallemantia iberica, 100% Carthamus tinctorius cultivation with 45% Lallemantia iberica, 100% Carthamus tinctorius with 60%Lallemantia iberica, 100% Carthamus tinctorius with 75%Lallemantia iberica. In this study, Carthamus tinctorius traits included number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, weight of 1000 seeds, seed yield and biological yield.
Results: The results showed that the effect of different cultivation patterns on the number of seeds per plant and seed weight was not significant, but it was significant on the number of pods per plant, seed yield and biological yield .The highest number of seeds according to the 100:30 mixed crop pattern (Lallemantia iberica- Carthamus tinctorius) and the highest seed yield and biological yield belonged to pure Carthamus tinctorius cultivation.The highest land equivalent ratio belonged to 100:30 mixed cultivation (Lallemantia iberica-Carthamus tinctorius).
Conclusion: 100:30 intercropping pattern (Lallemantia iberica-Carthamus tinctorius) was suggested as the suitable pattern of mixed cropping due to highest grain yield, biological yield and economic benefit.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • land equivalent ratio؛ number of seeds؛ safflower؛ seed weight
  • ؛ yield
Alizadeh Y, Koocheki A, and Nassiri Mahallati M, 2010. Investigating of growth characteristics, yield, yield components and potential weed control in intercropping of bean and vegetative sweet basil. Journal of Agroecology, 2: 383-397. (In Persian)
Alizadeh K, and Carapetian J. 2006. Genetic variation in a safflower germplasm grown in rained cold drylands. Journal of Agronomy, 5 (1): 50-55.
Allahdadi M, Shakiba, MR, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, A. and Amini R. 2013. Evaluation of yield and advantages of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.) and calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) Intercropping Systems, 3 (23):  47- 58.
Amanzadeh Y, Khosravi Dehaghi N, Gohari A, Monsef-Esfahani H. and Sadat Ebrahimi S. 2011. Antioxidant activity of essential oil of Lallemantia iberica in flowering stage and post flowering stage, Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 6 (3): 114-117.
Asgarnejad M, Zarey G, and Zarezadeh A. 2015. Effects of planting date and plant density on yield and yield components of Brassica nigra under Abarkooh climatic conditions. Journal of Crop Production, 8 (3): 183-198. (In Persian).
Awal M, Kochi H, and Ikeda T. 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 139: (2): 74-83.
Azary A, and Khajehpour M. 2005. Effect of planting arrangement on development, growth, yield components and seed yield of safflower, Isfahan local population in summer planting. Journal of Production and Processing of Crops and Horticultur, 9 (3): 133-142. (In Persian).
Bakhtiari Ramezani M, Labashchi M, and Nemati N. 2006. The effects of plant densities on yield and yield components of safflower on dry farming condition. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 22 (2): 155-160. (In Persian).
Bigonah R, Rezvani Moghaddam P, and Jahan M, 2014. Effects of intercropping on biological yield, percentage of nitrogen and morphological characteristics of coriander and fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12 (3): 369-377. (In Persian).
Jafari F, Yarnia M, and Valizadeh M. 2006. Investigation of planting density on yield, morphological characteristics and phenology of Azeri sunflower hybrid. Ninth Iranian Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Varamin, Page 59. (In Persian).
Jalilian J, Najafabadi A, and Zardashti MR. 2017. Intercropping patterns and different farming systems affect the yield and yield components of safflower and bitter vetch. Journal of Plant Interactions, 12 (1): 92-99.
Joseph K, Alley M, Brann D, and Gravelle W. 1985. Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 22(7): 211-214.
Jozayan Z, Yadvi A, Movahedi M, and Maghsoudi A. 2015. Effect of row spacing and plant density on quantitative and qualitative yield of soybean (max Glycine L.) under weed competition. Journal of Agroecolog, 6 )4(: 548-857. (In Persian).
Khoramdel S, Siahmarguee A, and Mahmudi G, 2016. Effect of replacement and additive intercropping series of ajowan with bean on yield and yield components. Journal of Crop Production, 9(1): 1-24. (In Persian).
Lafond‌ G. 1994. Effects of row spacing, seedling rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero-till management. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74 (4): 703-711.
Mahdavi Damghani A, Kouchaki A, and Zand A. 2006. Design and management of ecosystems in sustainable agriculture. Iranian Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, 7-5 September, Page 97. (In Persian)
Mahfouz H, and Imager EA. 2004. Effect of intercropping, weed control treatment and their interaction on yield and its attributes of chickpea and canola. Egyptian Journal Applied Science, 19 (4): 84-101.
Morales REJ, Escalante EJA, Sosa CL, and Volke, HVH. 2009. Biomass, yield and land equivalent ratio of Helianthus annus L. in sole crop and intercropped with Phaseolus vulgaris L. in high valleys of Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 10 (3): 431-439.
Midya A, Bhattach K, Ghose S, and Banik P. 2005. Deferred seedling of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) field on yield advantages and smothering of weeds. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 19 (3): 195-201.
Mirhashemi S, Kouchaki A, Parsa M, and Nasiri MM. 2009. Evaluating the benefit of ajowan and fenugreek intercropping in different levels of manure and planting pattern. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, (1): 271-281.
Mirhashemi S, Koocheki A, Parsa M, and Nassiri MM, 2010. Evaluation of growth indices of ajowan and fenugreek in pure culture and intercropping based on organic agriculture. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 7(2): 685-694.
Mousapour H, Ghanbari A, and Asghari pour MR. 2017. Effect of sowing date on yield, yield components, secondary metabolites content and weed control in ajwain and isabgol intercropping. Journal of Crops Improvement, 18(4):835-850. (In Persian).
Nasrollahzadeh S, Shafagh KJ, Mohammadi M, and Aghaie GP. 2014. Effect of intercropping patterns of chickpea and Dragons head (Lallemantia iberica) on yield, yield components and morphological traits of dragon’s head under different weed management. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2 (5): 1572-1581.
Noman MS, Maleque MA, Alam MZ, Afroz S, and Ishii HT, 2013. Intercropping mustard with four spice crops suppresses mustard aphid abundance, and increases both crop yield and farm profitability in central Bangladesh. International Journal of Pest Management, 59 (4): 306-313.
Omidy AH, Ghnadha M, Ahmadi M, and Payghambar, SA. 1999. Evaluation of some important agronomic traits safflower using multivariate statistical methods. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30 (4): 817-827. (In Persian)
Pandita A, Shah M, and Bali A. 2000. Effect of row ratio in cereal-legume intercropping systems on productivity and competition functions under Kashmir conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy . 45 (1): 48-53.
Park SE, Benjamin LR. and Watkinson AR. 2002. Comparing biological productivity in cropping systems: A competition approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39 (3): 416-426.
Poggio SL. 2005. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barely. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 109 (2): 48- 58.
Rajeswara Rao BR. 2002. Biomass yield, Essential oil yield and essential oil composition of rose-scented geranium (Pelargonium species) as influenced by row spacing and intercropping with corn mint (Mentha arvensis L.f. piperascons malinv. exholmes). Industrial Crops and Products, 16: 133-144.
Rezaei-Chianeh E, Nassab ADM, Shakira M, Ghassemi-Golezani K, Aharizad S, and Shekari FJ. 2011. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and fans bean (Vicia faba) at different plant population densities. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (7): 1786-1793.
Rezaei-Chiyaneh E, and Gholinezhad E, 2015. Agronomic characteristics of intercropping of additive series of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology, 7 (3): 381- 396. (In Persian).
Saudy HS, and Elmetwally IM. 2009. Weed management under different patterns of sunflower–soybean intercropping. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 10 (1): 41-52.
Shafagh-Kolvanagh J, Dalayi-Milan A, Zehtab-Salmasi S, Raei Y, and Dastborhan S. 2020. Effects of intercropping on weeds control and dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica Fischer & C.A. Meyer) Yield. Journal of Agroecology, 11(4): 1497-1510. (In Persian).
Singh JK. 2007. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping to different row ratios and nitrogen levels under rainfed conditions of temperate Kashmir. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52 (1): 36-39.
Sorkhi F. 2020. Effect of irrigation intervals and humic acid on physiological and biochemical
characteristic on medicinal plant of Thymus vulgaris. Journal of Plant Physiology, 10 (4): 3367-3378.
Sorkhi F. 2021. Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on antioxidant enzymes and chlorophyll contents
of Borago officinalis under salinity stress. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11 (2): 3589-3598.
Sorkhi, F, Rostami R, and Ghassemi-Golezani K. 2021. Improving resistance of Foeniculum vulgare to water deficit stress by natural regulators. Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo), 67 (1): 29-41.
Sorkhi, F and Khomari, S. 2021. Effect of different levels of water deficit on yield and amount of
osmotic regulator in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat genotypes. 23(1): 12-16.
Tadaion A, Torabian SM, and Tadaion M. 2014. Effect of plant density on yield and quality of four commercial cultivars of common flax. Journal of Agriculture, 15 (1): 26-15. (In Persian).
Tarieghi S, Fateh A, and Aynehband A. 2018. The effect of different barley (Hordeum vulgare) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum) intercropping planting ratio under nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter quality and quantity. Journal of Crop Production, 11(5):23-35. (In Persian).
Tu C, Louws FJ, Creamer NG, Mueller JP, Brownie C, and Fager K. 2006. Responses of soil microbial biomass and N availability to transition strategies from conventional to organic farming systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 113 (1-4): 206-215.
Yaseen M, Singh M, and Ram D. 2014. Growth, yield and economics of vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides L. Nash) under intercropping system. Industrial Crops and Products, 61:417-421.
Zafaranieh M. 2015. Effect of various combinations of safflower /chickpea intercropping on yield and yield components of safflower. Agriculture Science Developments, 4: 31–34.