اثر محلول پاشی نانوکودهای نیتروژنه، فسفره و پتاسه بر برخی صفات کمی نخود (Cicer arietinum) در کشت دیم دشت مغان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آگرو تکنولوژی- اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق

3 دانشجوی دکتری آگرو تکنولوژی- اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی،

4 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به‌منظور بررسی اثر نانوکودهای نیتروژنه، فسفره و پتاسه بر برخی صفات مورفولوژیکی، عملکرد و شاخص برداشت نخود و همچنین معرفی بهترین تیمار کودی انجام گردید. آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی 99-1398 در شرایط مزرعه در مرکز خدمات جهاد کشاورزی برزند از شهرستان گرمی استان اردبیل اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل 1T: محلول‌پاشی با نانوکود نیتروژنه 17 درصد، 2T: محلول‌پاشی با نانوکود فسفره 17 درصد، 3T: محلول‌پاشی با نانوکود کلات پتاسیم 27 درصد و 4T: شاهد بود. تجزیه واریانس داده‌ها نشان داد که اثر تیمارهای آزمایشی بر صفات ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاخه‌های فرعی، وزن تر و وزن خشک بوته، تعداد گره در ریشه، وزن خشک گره ریشه، تعداد غلاف، تعداد دانه، وزن دانه، وزن صد دانه، عملکرد دانه و شاخص برداشت معنی‌دار بود. اما، اثر تیمارهای آزمایشی در صفت ارتفاع اولین غلاف از سطح زمین معنی‌دار نبود. در اکثر صفات مورد مطالعه، بیشترین مقدار صفات در شرایط محلول‌پاشی نانوکود نیتروژنه و فسفره به‌دست آمد که عملکرد دانه را به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 81/47 و 29/53 درصد نسبت به تیمار شاهد افزایش دادند. بیشترین میزان شاخص برداشت نیز، در اثر محلول‌پاشی نانوکود فسفره به‌دست آمد که نسبت به تیمار شاهد این صفت را 93/22 درصد افزایش داد که با تیمار کودی نانوکود نیتروژنه در یک گروه مشترک بودند. کاربرد نانوکود نیتروژنه و فسفره سبب افزایش صفات مورد مطالعه نسبت به تیمار شاهد شدند، لذا توصیه می‌شود در این مناطق و مناطقی با اقلیم مشابه از این نانوکودها استفاده گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Foliar Application of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Nanofertilizers on Some Quantitative Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Dry farming of Moghan Plain

نویسندگان [English]

  • morteza Barmaki 1
  • shahram Hashemi Esmalikandi 2
  • Khadijeh Aghaeifard 3
  • Soodabeh Jahanbakhsh odekahriz 4
1 department of agronomy &plant breeding, faculty of agriculture and natural resource,University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources,University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (UMA). Ardabil. Iran.
3 Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources,University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (UMA). Ardabil. Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nanofertilizers on some morphological, yield and harvest characteristics of chickpea and also to introduce the best fertilizer treatment. The experiment in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications in the crop year 2019-2020 in farm conditions was conducted at the Jihad Agricultural Service Center in Barzand, Germi city, Ardabil province. Experimental treatments included T1: foliar application with 17% nitrogen nanofertilizer, T2: foliar application with 17% phosphorus nanofertilizer, T3: foliar application with 27% potassium chelate nanofertilizer and T4: control treatments. Analysis of variance showed that the effect of experimental treatments on plant height, number of sub-branches, fresh and dry weight of plant, number of nodes per root, dry weight of root node, number of pods, number of seeds, Seed weight, 100-seed weight, grain yield and harvest index were significant. In most of the studied traits, the highest amount of studied traits was obtained under foliar application of nitrogen and phosphorus nanofertilizers, which increased grain yield by 47.81% and 53.29%, respectively, compared to the control treatment. The highest harvest index was obtained by foliar application of phosphorus nanofertilizer, which increased this trait by 22.93% compared to the control treatment, which were common in a group with nitrogen fertilizer treatment. Application of nitrogen and phosphorus nanofertilizers increased the studied traits compared to the control treatment, so it is recommended to use these nanofertilizers in these areas and areas with similar climates.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Harvest index
  • Legumes
  • Nutrients
  • Plant dry weight
  • Plant height
  • Yield
Abdel-Aziz HMM, Hasaneen MNA and Aya MO. 2018. Foliar application of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer improves the yield of wheat plants grown on two different soils. The Egyptian Journal of Experimental Biology (Botany), 14(1): 63- 72.

Adeli C, Pasari B and Rokhzadi A 2019. Study the response of two chickpea cultivars to application of biological and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 11(39): 111- 125. (In Persian).

Alhasan AS. 2020. Effect of different NPK nano-fertilizer rates on agronomic traits, essential oil seed yield of Basil (Ocimum basilicun L. cv dolly) grown under field conditions. Plant Archives, 20(2): 2959- 2962.
Al-Juthery HWA, Habeeb KH, Altaee FJK, AL-Taey DKA and Al-Tawaha ARM. 2018. Effect of foliar application of different sources of nano-fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat. Journal by Innovative Scientific Information and Services Network, 15(4): 3988- 3997. 
Alzreejawi SAM and Al-juthery WAA. 2020. Effect of spray with nano npk, complete micro fertilizers and nano amino acids on some growth and yield indicators of maize (Zea mays L.). Iop Conference Series, Earth and Environmental Science, 533(12): 10- 18.
Amalya NS, Yuniarti A, Setiawan A and Machfud Y. 2020. The effect of N,P,K fertilizer and nano silica fertilizer to total N content, N uptake and black rice yield (Oryza Sativa L.) on inceptisols from jatinangor. Journal of Plant Science, 8(5): 185-188.
 Azizi E, Mirbolook A and Behdad A. 2017. The effect of different concentrations of nano- Molybdenum and Calcium fertilizers on growth parameters and nodulation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 9(4): 179- 199. (In Persian).
Burhan MG and AL-Hassan SA. 2019. Impact of nano NPK fertilizers to correlation between productivity, quality and flag leaf of some bread wheat varieties. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50(Special Issue): 1- 7.
Chipa H. 2017. Nanofertilizers and nanopesticides for agriculture. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 15(1): 15- 22.
Czymmek K, Ketterings Q, Ros M, Battaglia M, Cela S, Crittenden S, Gates D, Walter T, Latessa S, Klaiber L and Albrecht G. 2020. The New York Phosphorus Index 2.0”, Agronomy Fact Sheet Series. Fact Sheet 110, Cornell University Cooperative Extension, New York, NY, USA.
Diatta AA, Fike JH, Battaglia M, Galbraith JM and Baig MB. 2020. Effects of biochar on soil fertility and crop productivity in arid regions: A review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13: 1- 17.
Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Britt DW and Anderson AJ. 2015. Nano-CuO and interaction with nano-ZnO or soil bacterium provide evidence for the interference of nanoparticles in metal nutrition of plants. Ecotoxicology, 24: 119- 129.
Dorostkar E, Talebi R and Kanouni H. 2016. Foliar application of Fe, Zn and NPK nano-frtilizers on seed yield and morphological traits in Chickpea under rainfed conditin. Journal of Research in Ecology, 4(2): 221- 228.
Eid MAM, Abdel-Salam AA, Salem HM, Mahrous SE, Seleiman MF, Alsadon AA, Solieman THI and Ibrahim A. 2020. Interaction effects of nitrogen source and irrigation regime on tuber quality, yield, and water use efficiency of Solanum tuberosum L. Plants, 9(1): 110- 130.
Guo H, White JC, Wang Z and Xing B. 2018. Nano-enabled fertilizers to control the release and use efficiency of nutrients. Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health, 6: 77– 83.

Hamzei J, Seyedi M, Azadbakht A and Fesahat A 2018. Effect of foliar application of Iron on growth, nodulation and quantity and quality of yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Hamedan. Journal of crop ecophysiology, 3(47): 427- 444. (In Persian).

Hasaneen MNA, Abdel-aziz HMM and Omer AM. 2016. Effect of foliar application of engineered nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes NPK and chitosan nanoparticles NPK fertilizer on the growth of French bean plant. Biochemistry and Biotechnology Research, 4(4): 68- 76.
Hegab RH, Abou Batta WF and El-Shazly MM. 2018. Effect of mineral, nano and bio nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen content and productivity of Salvia officinalis L. plant. Journal of Science and Agriculture, 9(9): 393- 401.
Husen A and Iqbal M. 2019. Nanomaterials and Plant Potential, Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Ibrahim FR. 2019. Influence of potassium fertilization and nano-chitosan on growth, yield components and volatile oil production of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) plant. Journal of Plant Production of Mansoura University, 10(6): 435- 442.
Janmohammadi M, Sabaghnia N, Seifi A and Pasandi M. 2017. The impacts of nano-structured nutrients on chickpea performance under supplemental irrigation. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(3): 859- 870.
Keihani A and Modhej A. 2014. Growth reaction of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen fertilizer. Crop Physiology Journal, 6(21): 5- 15.
khalaj H, Baradarn Firouzabadi M and delfani M. 2020. Effect of nano iron and Magnesium chelate fertilizers on growth and grain yield of Vigna sinensis L.. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 9 (35): 161- 177.
 Koocheki A and Sarmadnia GH. 2013. Physiology of crop plants (Translation). Seventeenth Edition, University Jihad Publications, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 400 p. (In Persian).
Kubavat D, Trivedi K, Vaghela P, Prasad K, Vijay Anand G.K, Trivedi H, Patidar R, Chaudhari J, Andhariya B and Ghosh A. 2020. Characterization of a chitosan-based sustained release nanofertilizer formulation used as a soil conditioner while simultaneously improving biomass production of Zea mays L., Land Degradation and Development, 31(17): 2734– 2746.
Kumar P, Lai L, Battaglia ML, Kumar S, Owens V, Fike J, Galbraith J, Hong CO, Farris R, Crawford R, Crawford J, Hansen J, Mayton H and Viands D. 2019. Impacts of nitrogen fertilization rate and landscape position on select soil properties in switchgrass field at four sites in the USA. Catena, 180: 183– 193.
Laranjo M, Alexander A and Oliveira S. 2014. Legume growth-promoting rhizobia: An overview on the Mesorhizobium genus. Microbiological Research, 169(1): 2- 17.
Li SX, Wang ZH, Miao YF and Li SQ. 2014. Soil organic nitrogen and its contribution to crop production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(10): 2061– 2080.
Liu Y, Ding Y, Wang Q, Meng D and Wang S. 2011. Effects of nitrogen and 6‑benzylaminopurine on rice tiller bud growth and changes in endogenous hormones and nitrogen. Crop science, 51(2): 786 – 792.
Mahil EIT and Kumar BNA. 2019. Foliar application of nanofertilizers in agricultural crops. A review, Journal of Farm Sciences, 32(3): 239- 249.
Majnoon Hosseini N, Mohammadi H, Poustini K and Zeinaly Khanghah H. 2003. Effect of plant density on agronomic characteristics, chlorophyll content and stem remobilization percentage in Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 34(4): 1011- 1019. (In Persian).
Majnoon Hosseini N. 2015. Agronomy and Production of Pulses, Tehran University Jihad Publications, fifth edition, 284 p. (In Persian).
Marimuthu S and Surendran U. 2015. Effect of nutrients and plant growth regulators on growth and yield of black gram in sandy loam soils of Cauvery new delta zone, India. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 1(1): 1010415.
 Mehta S and Bharat R. 2019. Effect of integrated use of nano and non-nano fertilizers on yield and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8 (12): 598- 606.
Mirzaei A, Naseri R, Miri T, Soleymani Fard SMA and Fathi A. 2018. Reaspose of yield and yield components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to the application of plant growth promoting RhizohBacteria and Nitrogen Chemical Fertilizer under rainfed conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 11(4): 775- 790. (In Persian).
Mohamed SM, El-Ghait EMA, El-Shayeb NSA, Ghatas YA and Shahin AA. 2015. Effect of some fertilizers on improving growth and oil productivity of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cv. Genovese plant. Egypt Journal of Applied Science, 30(6): 384- 399.
Mohammadzadeh Alghou M, Janmohammadi M and Sabaghnia N. 2019. Effects of sowing date and nutrition management as organic, chemical, biological and nanotropic in Chickpea yield.  Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 11(4): 55- 70. (In Persian).
Morab PN, Kumar S, Rameshbhai KA and Uma V. 2021. Foliar nutrition of nano-fertilizers: A smart way to increase the growth and productivity of crops. Journal of Pharmacignosy and Phytochemistry, 10(1): 1325- 1330.

Namvar A, Seyyed Sharifi R, Sedghi R and Asghari-Zakaria R. 2011. Study on the Effects of Organic and Inorganic Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Yield Components, and Nodulation State of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42(9): 1097- 1109. 

Nasiri Mahallati M, Koocheki AR, Rezvani P and Beheshti AR. 2013. Agroecology (translation), Mashhad University Jihad Publications, sixth edition, 455 p. (In Persian).
Nouraein M. 2019. Effect of nanofertilizers and biofertilizers on yield of maize.  Botanica. 25(2): 121- 130. 
Pahlavan Rad MR, Keykha G and Naroui Rad MR. 2008. Effects of application of Zn, Fe and Mn on yield, yield component, nutrient concentration and uptake in wheat grain. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 79: 142-150. (In Persian).
Preetha PS and Balakrishnan N. 2017. A review of nano fertilizers and their use and functions in soil. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6: 3117– 3133.
Qureshi A, Singh D and Dwivedi S. 2018. Nano-fertilizers: A novel way for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and crop productivity. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7: 3325– 3335.
Rafiullah TM, Khan F, Shah AH, Fahad S, Wahid F, Ali J, Adnan M, Ahmad M, Irfan M, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Battaglia ML, Zarei T, Datta R, Saleem IA, Rehman H and Danish S. 2020. Effect of micronutrients foliar supplementation on the production and eminence of plum (Prunus domestica L.). Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops and Foods, 12(SP1): 32– 40.
Rajput VD, Minkina T, Sushkova S, Tsitsuash-vili V, Mandzhieva S, Gorovtsov A, Nevidoms-kyaya D and Gromakova N. 2018. Effect of nano particles on crops and soil microbial communities. Soils sediments, 18: 2179–2187.
Rop K, Karuku GN, Mbui D, Njomo N and Michira I. 2019. Evaluating the effects of formulated nano-NPK slow release fertilizer composite on the performance and yield of maize, kale and capsicum. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 64: 9- 19.
Rostami Ajirloo A, Shaaban M and Rahmati Motlagh Z. 2015. Effect of K nano-fertilizer and N biofertilizer on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 3(1): 138- 143.
Sayah ZN and Jameel DA. 2020. Effect of nano NPK balanced fertilizer (20-20-20) on some vegetative and fruiting growth of Cucurbita pepo L., EurAsian Journal of Biosciences, 14: 6627- 6633.
Seleiman MF, Almutairi KF, Alotaibi M, Shami A, Alhammad BA and Battaglia ML. 2021. Nano-fertilization as an emerging fertilization technique: Why can modern agriculture benefit from its use? Plants, 10(2): 27 pp.
Seleiman MF, Santanen A and Makela P. 2020. Recycling sludge on cropland as fertilizer-Advantages and risks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104647.
Seyed Sharifi R and Khalilzadeh R. 2018. Morphology and growth and development stages of crops (cereals, industrial plants, fodder and legumes), Mohaghegh Ardabili University Press, first edition, 505 p. (In Persian). 
Shadravan B, Janmohammadi M, Dashti SH and Sabaghnia N. 2018. Influence of integrated application of nano-chelated trace elements and sulfur on desi chickpea in the short-season mediteranean-type environment. Botanica, 24(1): 15- 25.
Singh N and Kataria N. 2012. Role of potassium fertilizer on nitrogen fixation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under quantified water stress. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 8(1): 377 – 392.
Sohair EED, Abdall AA, Amany AM, Hossain MF and Houda RA. 2018. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nano fertilizers with different application times, methods and rates on some growth parameters of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Bioscience Research, 15: 549- 564.
Soliman AS, Hassan M, Abou-Elell F, Ahmed AH and El-Feky SA. 2016. Effect of nano and molecular phosphorus fertilizers on growth and chemical composition of Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.). Journal of Plant Sciences, 11: 52– 60.

Taghizadeh R and Seyed Sharifi R. 2011. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yield attributes and nitrogen use efficiency in Corn cultivars. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 15 (57): 209-217. (In Persian).

Tarafdar JC, Sharma S and Raliya R. 2012. Nano-technology: Interdisciplinary science of applications. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(3): 219- 226.
Tavan T, Niakan M and Norinia AA. 2014. Effect of nano-potassium fertilizer on growth factors, photosynthetic system and protein content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. CV. N8019). Journal of plant environmental physiology, 3(35): 61- 71. (In Persian).
Tobeh A, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S and Ziachehreh M. 2017. Chickpea cultivation. Ardabil University Jihad Publications. First Edition, 192 p.
Unkovich M, Baldock J and Forbes M. 2010. Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: Examples from Australian agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 105: 173-219.
Valadkhan M, Mohammadi K.H and Karimi Nezhad MT. 2015. Effect of priming and foliar application of nanoparticles on agronomic traits of chickpea. Biological Forum, 7(2): 599- 602.
Varshney RK, Thudi M and Muehlbauer F. 2017. The Chickpea Genome. Springer International Publishing.
Weiss A, Pasari b and Rokhzadi A. 2019. Investigating the effect of humic acid and micronutrient nano fertilizers on the response of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in autumn cultivation. Crop Physiology Journal, 10(40): 93- 110. (In Persian).
White AC, Rogers A, Rees M and Osborne CP. 2016. How can we make plants grow faster? A source- sink perspective on growth rate. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(1): 31- 45.
Wu M. 2013. Effects of incorporation of nano-carbon into slow-released fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen loss in surface water of paddy soil. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 5: 398- 403.