ارزیابی عملکرد و شاخص‌های اکولوژیکی کشت مخلوط افزایشی نخود با بالنگوی شهری در شرایط دیم شهرستان سقز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارمند جهاد کشاورزی

2 عضو هیات علمی آموزشی دانشگاه تبریز

3 عضو هیئت علمی گروه آموزشی اکوفیزیولوژی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز

4 عضو هیئت علمی گروه اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

5 بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کردستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، سنندج، ایران

چکیده

اهداف: این پژوهش به منظور بررسی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد کشت مخلوط نخود و بالنگوی شهری و تعیین بهترین نسبت الگوی کشت مخلوط این دو گونه در شرایط دیم شهرستان سقز انجام شد.
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال زراعی 1400-1401 در شهرستان سقز اجرا شد. فاکتور اول شامل، 3 زمان کاشت (پاییزه، انتظاری، بهاره)، فاکتور دوم در 3 سطح شامل ارقام نخود سارال، نصرت، آنا و فاکتور سوم در 5 الگوی کشت شامل کشت خالص نخود، (25 درصد بالنگوی شهری: 100 درصد نخود)، (50 درصد بالنگوی شهری: 100درصد نخود)، ( 75 درصد بالنگوی شهری: 100 درصد نخود) و کشت خالص بالنگو بود.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد بین ارقام نخود از نظر ارتفاع بوته اختلاف معنی‌داری در سطح یک درصد از لحاظ زمان کاشت وجود دارد. بیشترین تعداد دانه در بوته نخود در رقم آنا در فصل زمستان و در کشت خالص بدست آمد. کارایی استفاده از زمین مثبت و بزرگتر از یک بود. نسبت رقابت در الگوی کشت 100:50 در فصل پاییز و رقم نصرت بیشترین میزان بود. بیشترین میزان شاخص بهره‌وری سیستم به نسبت کاشت 100:25 رقم نصرت در فصل بهار تعلق داشت.
نتیجه‌گیری کلی: الگوی کشت مخلوط 100:25 بالنگوی شهری و رقم نخود نصرت در کشت انتظاری در شرایط آب و هوایی شهرستان سقز مناسب و می‌تواند به‌عنوان الگوی کشت مخلوط مناسب توصیه نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of performance and ecological indicators of intercropping of chickpeas with urban chickpeas in the dry conditions of Saqez city.

نویسندگان [English]

  • hiwa nikdel 1
  • jalil Shafagh 2
  • Safar Nasrollahzadeh 3
  • Yaegoob Raee 4
  • Homayoun Kanouni 5
1 سازمان جهادکشاورز ی کردستان
2 university of Tabriz
3 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Department of Crop Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
4 Professor, Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Department of Crop Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
5 Field and Horticultural Crops Research Dept., Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background & Objective: This research was carried out in order to investigate the performance and performance components of mixed cultivation of chickpeas and L. iberica and to determine the best ratio of the mixed cultivation pattern of these two species in the dry conditions of Saqez city.
Methods & Materials: The experiment was carried out as a factorial split plot in the form of a randomized complete block design with three repetitions in Saqez city. The first factor includes 3 planting times (autumn, waiting, spring), the second factor in 3 levels including Saral, Nusrat, Anna chickpea cultivars and the third factor in 5 cultivation patterns including pure chickpea cultivation (25% urban balangu: 100% chickpeas). , (50% urban balango: 100% chickpeas), (75% urban balango: 100% chickpeas) and pure balango cultivation.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant difference between chickpea cultivars in terms of plant height at the level of 1% in terms of planting time. The highest number of seeds per chickpea plant was obtained in Anna variety in winter season and in pure culture. Land use efficiency was positive and greater than one. The competition ratio in the 100:50 cropping pattern was the highest in the autumn season and Nusrat variety. .
Conclusion: 100:25 intercropping pattern of L. iberica and Nusrat chickpea variety in expected cultivation in the climatic conditions of Saqez city is suitable and can be recommended as a suitable intercropping pattern.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cultivation Pattern
  • Function
  • Land Use Efficiency
  • Mixed Cropping
  • Productivity Index
Amani Machiani M, Javanmard A, Morshedloo MR and Maggi F. 2018. Evaluation of competition, essential oil quality and quantity of peppermint intercropped with soybean. Industrial Crops and Products, 111:743-754.
Amani Machiani M, Rezaei-Chiyaneh E, Javanmard A, Maggi F and Morshedloo MR. 2019. Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed yield and quali-quantitative production of the essential oils from fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) and dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica) in intercropping system under humic acid application. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235: 112.122.
 Amanzadeh Y, Khosravi dehaghi N, Ghorbani AR, Monsef-Esfahani HR and Sadat-Ebrahimi SE. 2011. Antioxidant activity of Essential oil of Lallemantia iberica in Flowering stage and Post-Flowering stage. Biological Sciences, 6(3): 114-117.
Amirmardfar A, Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A, Raei Y, Khaghaninia S, Amini R, Tabataba Vakili S. 2015. Evaluation of yield and yield components of oil seed rape in the wheat-oil seed rape strip intercropping influenced by chemical and biological fertilizers. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 8 (4): 437-450. (In Persian).
Banik B, Midya A, Sarkar BK and Ghose SS. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, (24): 325-332.
Borghi E, Crusciol CAC, Nascente AS, Sousa VV and Martins PO. 2013. Sorghum grain yield, forage biomass production and revenue as affected by intercropping time. European Journal of Agronomy, 51:130-139.
Chapagain T, Riseman A. 2014. Barley-pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogn transformations. Field Crops Research, 166: 18-25.
Dhima K V, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB and Dordas CA. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 100: 249-256.
Jones G and Valamoti SM. 2005. Lallemantia an imported or introduced oil plant in Bronze Age northern Greece. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 14: 571-577.
Hamzei J, Seyedi M, Ahmadvand G and Abutalebian MA. 2012. The effect of additive intercropping on weed suppression, yield and yield component of chickpea and barley. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2:43- 55 (In Persian).
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M and Jensen ES. 2009. Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 113: 64–71.
Kremer RJ and Kussman RJ. 2011. Soil quality in a pecan-kura clover alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA. Agroforest System, 93: 213-223.
Khoramdel S, Siahmarguee A and Mahmudi Gh. 2016.Effect of replacement and additive intercropping series of ajowan with bean on yield and yield components. Journal of Crop Production, 9(1): 1-24. (In Persian).
Lamei Hervani, J. 2013. Assessment of dry forage and crude protein yeilds, competition and advantage indices in mixed cropping of annual forage legume crops with barley in rainfed comditions of Zanjan province in Iran. Spj., 29:169-183.
Lithourgidis AS, Vlachostergios DN, Dordas CA and Damalas CA. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34: 287-294.
Mandani F and Jalilian A. 2018. Evaluation of the Interaction between Sowing Date and Cultivar on Different Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Kermanshah Climate Conditions. Plant production technology,1:31-57.
Maoa L, Zhang L, Zhaoc X, Liuc S, Werfd WV, Zhangc S, Spiertzd H and Lia Z. 2014. Crop growth, light utilization and yield of relay intercropped cotton as affected by plant density and a plant growth regulator. Field Crops Research, 5: 67–76.
Mehni j, Mahdavi B, Azari A, Afkar s,Hashemi SE. 2020. Evaluation of yield and productivity indices of black cumin and fenugreek intercropping under weedy and weed-free conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 3: 73-87
Mikic A, Cupinax B, Rubiales D, Mihailovi V, Sarunaitek L, Fustec J, Antanasovicx S, Krsticx D, Bedoussac L, Zoricx L, DorCevic V, Peric V and Srebri M. 2014. Models, Developments, and Perspectives of Mutual Legume Intercropping. Journal Advances Agronomy, 130: 1-83.
Mirhashmi M, Koocheki A, Parsa M and Nasiri Mahallati M. 2009. Advantage ajotva seeds and fenugreek intercropping at different levels of manure and planting. Iranian Journal Agriculture Research, 7: 259-269. (In Persian).
Mobasser HR, Vazirimehr MR and Rigi Kh. 2014. Effect of intercropping on resources use, weed management and forage quality. International Journal of Plant. Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4 (2): 706-713.
Mousapour H, Ghanbari A, Sirousmehr AR and Asgharipour MR. 2015. Effect of sowing time on seed yield, advantage and competitive indices in ajwain (Carum copticum L.) and isabgol (Plantago ovate Forsk.) intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 17(2): 139-152. (In Persian)
Nassiri Mahallati M, Koocheki AR, Mondani F, Feizi H and Amirmoradi SH. 2014. Determination of           optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in           Northeast Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8(2): 1-8.
Peters NCB and Wilson JB. 1981. Some studies on the competition between (Avena Fatua L.) and spring barley. II variation of A. fatua emergence and development and its influence oncrop yield. Journal of Weed Research, 23: 305-311.
Singh M, Singh UB, Ram M, Yadav A and Chanotiya CS. 2013. Biomass yield, essential oil yield and quality of geranium (Pelargonium graveolens L.) as influenced by intercropping with garlic (Allium sativum L.) under subtropical and temperate climate of India. Industrial Crops and Products, 46: 234-237.
Pouramir F, Koocheki A, Nasiri Mahallati M and Ghorbani R. 2010. Evaluating yield and yield components of sesame and pea intercropping replacement series. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(5): 747-757. (In Persian).
Raei Y, Bolandnazar SA and Dameghsi N. 2011. Evaluation of common bean and potato densities effects on potato tuber yield in mono-cropping and intercropping systems. Journal Agricultural Sciences and Sustainable Production, 21(2): 131-142.
Rafael M, Enez-Díaz J, Castillo P, Jimenez-Gasco M. D. M, Landa B and Navas-Cortes J.A. 2015. Fusarium wilt of chickpeas: Biology, ecology and management. Crop Protection, 23: 1-12.
Rezaei-Chiyaneh E and Gholinezhad E. 2015. Agronomic characteristics of intercropping of additive series of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology, 7(3): 381-396 (In Persian).
Rezvani moghadam P and Moradi R. 2012. Assessment of Planting Date, Biological Fertilizer and
Intercropping on Yield and Essential Oil of Cumin and Fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Crops Sciences,
43(2): 217-230. (In Persian)
Tuna C and Orak A. 2007. The role of intercropping on yield potential of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)/oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2: 14-19.
Valimohammadi F, Tajbakhsh M and Saeidi A. 2007. Comparison winter and spring sowing dates and effect of plant density on yield, yield components and some quality, morphological traits of chickpes under environmental condition of Urmia, Iran. Journal of Agronomy, 6(4): 571-575.
Verma RK, Chauhan A, Verma RS, Rahman L and Bisht A. 2013. Improving production potential and
resources use efficiency of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) intercropped with geranium (Pelargonium
graveolens L. Herit ex Ait) under different plant density. Industrial Crops and Products, 44: 577-582
Wang Z, Zhao X, Wu P, He J, Chen X, Gao Y and Cao X. 2015. Radiation interception and utilization by wheat/maize strip intercropping systems. Journal Agricultural Forest Meteor, 204: 58-66.
Willey RW. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs: Part I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crop Abstracts, 32: 1–10.
Willey RW and Rao MR. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16: 117–125.
Xu BC, Li FM and Shan L. 2008. Switch grass and milk vetch intercropping under 2:1 row replacement in semiarid region, northwest China: Aboveground biomass and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy, 228: 485-492.
Yang F, Huang S, Gao R, Liu W, Yong T, Wang X, Wu X and Yang W. 2014. Growth of soybean seedling in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far- red ratio. Field Crops Research, 155: 245-253.
Yilmaz S, Atak M and Erayman M. 2008. Identification of advantages of maizelegume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the east Mediterranean region. Turk Journal of Agriculture, 32: 111-119.
Yilmaz S, Ozel A, Atak M and Erayman M. 2015. Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39: 135-143.
Zarifpour N, Naseri Poor Yazdi MT and Nassiri Mahallati M. 2014. Effect of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on quantity and quality characteristic of species. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1): 34-43 (In Persian).
Zaferanieh M, Nezami A, Parsa M, Porsa H and Bagheri, A. 2009. Evaluation of fall sowing of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms under complementary irrigation in Mashhad condition:
2- Yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 7: 483-492. (In Persian).