اثر افزودن ورمی کمپوست آماده و چای کمپوست به بستر مواد خام تهیه شده از پسماند جامد گاوی روی محصول نهایی ورمی کمپوست

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی سابق مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز

2 گروه آموزشی مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 گروه به نژادی و بیوتکنولوژی گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز

10.22034/saps.2025.66203.3349

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف: هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی امکان فراهم آوردن محیط رشد مناسب­تر برای تغذیه بهتر ورمی (کرم)، و افزایش بازده تبدیل پسماند و نیز مطالعه اثر افزودن درصدی از ورمی­کمپوست و بازگردانی چای کمپوست به بستر ورمی­کمپوست حاوی درصدی از پسماند جامد و خالص گاو، روی کیفیت کمپوست، تغییرات وزن زیست­توده کرم و میزان کوکون نسبت به تیمار شاهد بود.
 
مواد و روش­ها: این مطالعه به مدت پنج هفته با هشت تیمار (C70V30W، C80V20W، C90V10W، C100W (شاهد)، C70V30T، C80V20T، C90V10T، C100T) که هر تیمار دارای درصدی از پسماند جامد گاو (%C) و ورمی­کمپوست (%V) بود، در قالب طرح کرت­های خرد­شده بر مبنای طرح کاملا تصادفی در سه تکرار برای وزن زیست­توده کرم و میزان کوکون انجام شد که در آن تیمارها در کرت­های اصلی و هفته­ها در کرت­های فرعی قرار گرفتندحروف T وW، نشان دهنده به­ترتیب چای کمپوست بازگردانی شده (T) و آب (W) می­باشند. افزون بر این، اندازه­گیری عناصر ماکرو (K، N، P) و میکرو (Cu، Fe، Mn، Zn)، نسبت C/N، EC و pH در پایان هفته پنجم صورت گرفت که داده­های حاصل در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با سه تکرار تجزیه شدند.
 
یافته­ها: نتایج نشان داد که در طی فرایند تولید کمپوست، با افزودن 30 درصد ورمی­کمپوست به پسماند جامد گاو، مقادیر زیست­توده کرم، تعداد کوکون، نسبتC/N ، N وpH  افزایش می­یابد. اما افزودن چای کمپوست بجز EC و K، روی بقیه متغیر­های وابسته اثر منفی داشت. بیشترین اثر منفی در ترکیب 10 درصد ورمی­کمپوست با 90 درصد پسماند جامد گاو مشاهده شد. در تیمارهای مختلف تغییرات معنی­داری در میزان P مشاهده نشد.
 
نتیجه­گیری: نتایج به­دست آمده حاکی از اثر مثبت افزودن 30 درصد ورمی­کمپوست به مواد خام روی زیست­توده کرم، تعداد کوکون و برخی عناصر ماکرو و میکرو موجود در ورمی­کمپوست حاصل و اثر منفی افزودن چای کمپوست به مواد خام، روی متغیرهای مذکور بود.    
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of adding Vermicompost Products and Compost Tea to the bed of Raw Materials prepared from Cow Dung on the final Vermicompost Product

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahim Mohammadpour 1
  • Hamid Reza Ghassemzadeh 2
  • Mohammad Moghaddam 3
1 , Former MSc Student, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166614776, Iran
3 Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: The present research was aimed to investigate the possibility of providing a more suitable environment for better nutrition of vermi (worms), and to increase the conversion efficiency of waste materials, as well as to study the effect of adding percentages of vermi-compost and compost tea into the vermicompost bed containing solid and pure cow dung, on the compost quality and changes in worm biomass and number of cocoons in contrast to the control treatment.
 
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out for five weeks with eight vermicompost treatments (C70V30W، C80V20W، C90V10W، C100W(Control) ،C70V30T، C80V20T، C90V10T، C100T), each of which had a certain combination of solid cow dung and a percentage of vermicompost with compost tea, in the form of a split-plot design based on a completely randomized design in three replications for worm biomass and the number of cocoons, in which vermicompost treatments were placed in the main plots and weeks in sub-plots. T and W, are indications for recycled compost tea or water, respectively. In addition, macronutrients (K, N, P) and micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn), C/N ratio, EC, and pH were measured at the end of the fifth week. Then, the data were analyzed in the form of a completely random design with three replications.
 
Results: The results showed that during the compost production process, by adding 30% vermicompost to solid cow dung, worm biomass, cocoon number, pH, C/N, and N increased. But adding compost tea had a negative effect on the dependent variables, except for EC and K. The highest negative effect was observed in the combination of 10% compost tea with 90% solid cow dung. No significant changes in P were observed in different treatments.
 Conclusion: The results indicated the positive effect of adding 30% of vermicompost to raw materials on worm biomass, cocoon number, and some macro and micronutrients present in the resulting vermicompost, and the negative effect of adding compost tea to raw materials on these variables.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chemical Analysis
  • Cocoon
  • Environment
  • Recycling
  • Soil Amendment
Abdoli ME. 2005. Recycling and disposal of urban solid waste. Tehran University Publications, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Ajaweed AN, Hassan FM, and Hyder NH. 2022. Evaluation of physio-chemical characteristics of bio fertilizer produced from organic solid waste using composting bins. Sustainability, 14: 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738
Ali Ehyaei M and Behbahanizadeh A. 1993. Description of methods for chemical analysis of soil. Publication of the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran. First Edition, No. 893, 128 pages. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Alikhani H. 2006. Raising vermicompost producing worms and sustainable agriculture (translation and compilation). Aizh Publications. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Allen, J. 2016. Vermicomposting. Guide H-164. New Mexico State University. USA.
Anonymous. 2024. Mehr News Agency. 7 April 2024. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Asgari Safdar AH and Moradi Kor N. 2014. Vermicompost and verminculture: structure, benefits and usage. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2(3): 775-782.
Benitez E,  Nogales R, Elvira C, Masciandaro G, and Ceccanti B. 2000. Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabilization of sewage sludges composting with Eisenia fetida. Bioresource Technology, 67(3): 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00117-5
Biliteweski B, Hartle G, and Marek K. 2010. Waste management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,  Heidelberg.
Ducasse V, CapowiezY, and Peigné J. 2022. Vermicomposting of municipal solid waste as a possible lever for the development of sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42: 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00819-y
Dume B, Hanc A, Svehla P, Míchal P, Chane AD, Nigussie A. 2021. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions during the composting and vermicomposting of sewage sludge under the effect of different proportions of straw pellets. Atmosphere, 12(11): 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111380
Eastman BR, Kane PN, Edwards CA, Trytek L, Gunadi B, Stermer AL, and Mobley JR. 2001. The effectivenss of vermiculture in human pathogen reduction for USEPA biosolids stabilization. Compost Science and Utilization, 9(1): 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2001.10702015
Edwards CA, 1987. Breakdown of animal, and industrial organic waste by earthworms. In: Edwards CA and Neuhaser EF (Eds.) Earthworms in waste and environmental and management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague  pp. 21-33.
Elvira C, Sampedro L, Benitez E, and Nogales R. 1998. Vermicomposting of sludges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia andrei: A pilot-scale study. Bioresource Technology, 63(3): 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00145-4
Enebe MC and  Erasmus M. 2023. Vermicomposting technology- A perspective on vermicompost production technologies, limitations and prospects. Journal of Environmental Management, 345: 118585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118585
Eynde S. 2022. Evaluation changes of vermicomposting and thermophilic compost in industrial waste. International Journal of Waste Resources, 12: 493. https://doi.org/10.35248/ 2252-5211.22.12.493
Garg VK,  Kuashik P, and Dilbaghi N. 2006. Vermiconversion of wastewater sludge from textile mill mixed with anaerobically digested biogas plant slurry emploing Eisenia fetida. Exotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 65(3): 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.002
Jorfinezhad S, Farrokhian F, and Tekdastan A. 2012. Quantitative and qualitative study of livestock industry waste and providing management solutions for their optimal organization and disposal (case study of Hamidieh Industrial Park dairy farms). First International Conference on Environmental Crises and Solutions for Its Improvement. 14-15 February 2012, Kish Island. Iran. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Joshi TN, Nepali DB, Sah R, Bhattarai T, and Midmore DJ. 2020. A comparison of composting and vermicomposting for the disposal of poultry waste. Animal Production Science, 60: 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17177
Kholostov G, Sazanova E, Popov A, Ryumin A, Yakkonen K, and Vishnyakov A. 2022. Sewage sludge as an object of vermicomposting. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2022: 101281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101281
Maharjan KK, Noppradit P, and Techato K. 2023. Potential of Eisenia fetida (Redworm) for the conversion of three varieties of organic waste. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 12(3): 341-350. https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2022.1958871.1466
Manna MC, Jha S, Ghosh PK, and Acharya CL. 2003. Comparative efficiency of three epigeic earthworms under different deciduous forest litters decomposition. Bioresource Technology, 88(3): 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00318-8
Munroe G. 2007. Manual of on-farm vermicomposting and vermicultutre. Organic Agriculture Center of Canada, pp 39. Dalhousie University. Canada.
Nair J, Sekiozoic V, and Anda M. 2006. Effect of pre-composting on vermicomposting of kitchen waste. Bioresource Technology, 97(16): 2091-2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.09.020
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, and Das KC. 2000. Effect of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresource Technology, 71(1): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00055-3
Ning J-Y, Zhu X-D, Liu H-G, and Yu G-H. 2021. Coupling thermophilic composting and vermicomposting processes to remove Cr from biogas residues and produce high value-added biofertilizers. Bioresource Technology, 329: 124869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124869
Parihar SS, Saini KPS, Lakhani GP, Jain A, Roy B, Ghosh S, and Aharwal B. 2019. Livestock waste management: A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7(3): 384-393.
Polprasert C. 1996. Organic waste recycling. Chapter 3, pp. 81. England: John Wiley & Sons.
Raza ST, Zhu B, Tang JL, Ali Z, Anjum R, Bah H, Iqbal H, Ren X, Ahmad R. 2020.  Nutrients recovery during vermicomposting of cow dung, pig manure, and biochar for agricultural sustainability with gases emissions. Applied Sciences, 10(24): 8956. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248956
Raza ST, Rong L, Rene ER, Ali Z, Iqbal H, Sahito ZA, and Chen Z. 2024. Effects of vermicompost preparation and application on waste recycling, NH3, and N2O emissions: A systematic review on vermicomposting. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 35: 103722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103722
Safarkhanlou L and Torkamani Bojdani H.  2007. Vermicompost production: New management of wastes. Proceedings of the 3rd National Symposium on Wastes, 21-22 April, Tehran, Iran, pp. 479-488. (In Persian with English Abstract).
Samavat S and Malakouti MG. 2003. Necessity of industrial production of vermi-compost using waste. Technical Publication of Soil and Water Research Institute, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Iran. (In Persian with English Abstract).   
Sarker MA, Hashem MA, Murshed HM, Kamal MT, Haque MR, and. Rahman MM. 2021. Production and evaluation of vermicompost from different types of livestock manures. Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 2(2): 62-67. https://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2021.2211
Sayara T, Basheer-Salimia R, Hawamde F, and Sánchez A. 2020. Recycling of organic wastes through composting: Process performance and cmpost application in agriculture. Agronomy, 10(11): 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111838
Sherman-Huntoon R. 2000. Latest developments in mid-to-large scale vermicomposting. BioCycle, 41(11): 51-54.
Singh S, Sinha RK. 2022. Vermicomposting of organic wastes by earthworms: Making wealth from waste by converting ‘garbage into gold’for farmers In: Hussain CM, Hait S (eds.) Advanced Organic Waste Management: Sustainable Practices and Approaches, 1st Edition. Elsevier, pp. 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85792-5.00004-6
Tripathi G and Bhardwag P. 2004. Comprative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting efficiency of Eisenia fetida (Savingy) and Lampito mauritii (Kinberg). Bioresource Technology, 92(3): 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.005
Vodounnou DSJV, Kpogue DNS, Tossavi CE, Mennsah GA, and Fiogbe ED. 2016. Effect of animal waste and vegetable compost on production and growth of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) during vermiculture. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 5(1): 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0119-5
Yadav J, Gupta RK, Kumar D. 2017. Changes in C: N ratio of different substrates during vermicomposting. Ecology, Environment and Conservation 23(1) : 368-372.
Yin J, Wang J, Zhao L, Cui Z, Yao S, Li G, Yuan J. 2025.          Compost tea: Preparation, utilization mechanisms, and agricultural applications potential – A comprehensive review. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 38: 104137.
Zhou B, Chen Y, Zhang C, Li J, Tang H, Liu J, Dai J, Tang J. 2021. Earthworm biomass and population structure are negatively associated with changes in organic residue nitrogen concentration during vermicomposting. Pedosphere, 31(3): 433-439.doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60089-3