بازتاب کمی و کیفی چغندرقند (Beta vulgaris L.) به کاربرد تلفیقی کودهای شیمیایی و نانو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه مراغه

2 اگرواکولوژی، گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه مراغه

3 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ارومیه، ایران.

چکیده

     به­منظور بررسی اثرات نانو کلات­های ماکرو، میکرو و کودهای شیمیایی بر عملکرد و کیفیت محصول چغندرقند (Betavulgaris) آزمایشی بر پایه طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و ده تیمار در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی میاندوآب در سال زراعی 1394 اجرا گردید. تیمارها شامل 100 درصد کود شیمیایی NPK به عنوان شاهد، نانو کلات میکرو کامل، نانو کلات NPK، نانو کلات NPK+ نانو کلات میکرو کامل، نانو کلات NPK+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی، نانو کلات میکرو کامل+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی، نانو کلات NPK+ نانو کلات میکرو کامل+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی، نانو کلات آهن+ نانو کلات روی، نانو کلات آهن+ نانو کلات روی+ نانو کلات NPK و نانو کلات آهن+ نانو کلات روی+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی بودند. نتایج نشان داد بیشترین و کمترین میزان عملکرد ریشه و شاخص کلروفیل به‌ترتیب در تیمارهای نانو کلات NPK+ نانو کلات میکرو کامل+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی و نانو کلات آهن+ نانو کلات روی حاصل شد. همچنین بیشترین عملکرد قند ناخالص و خالص با کاربرد نانو کلات NPK+ نانو کلات میکرو کامل+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی بدست آمد. کاربرد 100 درصد کود شیمیایی به افزایش میزان نیتروژن مضره، پتاسیم و قند ملاس منجر شد. در حالی که کمترین میزان شاخص‌های ذکر شده با کاربرد نانو کلات NPK و نانو کلات میکرو کامل مشاهده شد. به‌طور کلی، بر اساس شاخص‌های عملکرد ریشه، عملکرد قند ناخالص و خالص و ضریب استحصال، کاربرد نانو کلات NPK+ نانو کلات میکرو کامل+ 50 درصد کود شیمیایی به عنوان تیمار برتر و جایگزین مصرف کودهای شیمیایی معرفی شد.
 
 


 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Quantitative and Qualitative Response of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to Integrated Application of Chemical and Nano Fertilizers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdollah Javanmard 1
  • Reyhaneh Vahed Miandoab 2
  • Mostafa Amani Machiani 1
  • Amin Abbasi 1
  • Keyvan Fotouhi 3
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluation macro, micro, and chemical fertilizers on the quality and yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), an experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with 10 treatments and 3 replications at Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Station of Miandoab, Iran in 2016. The treatments were 100% chemical fertilizer as control, full micro-chelate nanofertilizer, NPK nanofertilizer, NPK nanofertilizer + full micro-chelate nanofertilizer, NPK nanofertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizers, full micro-chelate nanofertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizers, NPK nanofertilizer + full micro-chelate nanofertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizers, Fe nano+ Zn nano, Fe nano+ Zn nano+ NPK nanofertilizer and Fe nano+ Zn nano+ 50% chemical fertilizers. The results demonstrated that the highest and the lowest root yield and chlorophyll index were obtained in NPK nanofertilizer + full micro-chelate nanofertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizers and Fe nano+ Zn nano, respectively. Also, the highest sugar yield and white sugar yield were achieved in NPK nanofertilizer + full micro-chelate nanofertilizer + 50% chemical fertilizers. The highest content of α-amino-N, Na, K and molasses sugar was recorded in application of 100% chemical fertilizer. In addition to, minimum values of the mentioned indices were obtained in NPK nanofertilizer and full micro-chelate. Generally, application of NPK nanofertilizer+ full micro-chelate nanofertilizer+ 50% chemical fertilizers suggested as superior treatment and replacement of chemical fertilizers based on root yield, white sugar yield and extraction coefficient of sugar.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • -Amino-N
  • Molasses Sugar
  • Nano-Fertilizer
  • Root Yield
  • White Sugar
Abdel-Motagally FMF and Attia KK. 2009. Response of sugar beet plants to nitrogen and potassium fertilization in sandy calcareous soil. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11: 695–700.
Abyaneh HA, Jovzi M and Albaji M. 2017. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation, partial root drying and N-fertilizer levels on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L.). Agricultural Water Management, 194: 13–23.
Aghazadeh-Khalkhali D, Mehrafarin A, Abdossi V and Naghdi Badi H. 2015. Mucilage and Seed Yield of Psyllium (Plantago psyllium L.) in Response to Foliar Application of Nano-iron and Potassium Chelate Fertilizer. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 4(56): 23-34.
Amani Machiani M, Javanmard A, Morshedloo MR and Maggi F. 2018. Evaluation of yield, essential oil content and compositions of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) intercropped with faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Cleaner Production, 171: 529-537.
Arefi I, Kafi M, Khazaee HR and Banayan Aval M. 2012. Effect of nitrogen phosphorous and potassium fertilizer levels on yield, photosynthetic rate photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll content, and nitrogen concentration of plant components of Allium altissimum Regel. Agroecology, 4(3): 207-214.
Artyszak A, Gozdowski D and Kucińska K. 2014. The effect of foliar fertilization with marine calcite in sugar beet. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60: 413–417.
Bagherzadeh A, Kalat SMN and Hajian J. 2014. Effects of Residual Wheat Straw and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in a Semi-Arid Region. Sugar Tech, 16: 189–194.
Behaeen MA, Ashraf Mansouri GR and Hamidi F. 2011. Effect of different tillage methods in monogerm seedbed prepartion on yield and qulaity of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 28 (2): 123-135. (In Persian).
Biancardi E, McGrath MJ, Panella LW, Lewellen RT and Stevanato P. 2010. Root and Tuber Crops. Chapter 6. Sugar Beet. Root and Tuber Crops, 245-289.
Broadley M, Brown P, Cakmak I, Rengel Z and Zhao F. 2012. Function of Nutrients: Micronutrients. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Third Edition. Elsevier.
Celik H, Bulent BA, Serhat G and Katkat VA. 2010. Effect of potassium and iron on macro element uptake of maize. Zemdirbyste, 97: 11–22.
Delfani M, Baradarn Firouzabadi M, Farrokhi N and Makarian H. 2014. Some Physiological Responses of Black-Eyed Pea to Iron and Magnesium Nanofertilizers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45: 530–540.
Dihim Fard R and Nazari Sh. 2015. Effect of nitrogen application on quantitative and qualitative of sugar beet cultivars. Journal of Plant Production Research, 22(2): 71-93.
Draycott AP and Christensone DR. 2003. Nutrients for Sugar beet production. CABI publishing. Wallingford, pp: 191.
Eisvand HR, Esmaeili A and Mohammadi M. 2014. Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on some quantity, quality and physiological characteristics in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Khoramabad climate. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 45(2): 287-298. (In Persian).
FAO. 2016. Production Statistics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org
Ghasemi A, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH and Jafari M. 2012. Synthesis of iron -amino acid chelates and evaluation of their efficacy iron source and growth stimulator for tomato in nutrient solution culture. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 31: 498-508.
Ghodsi A, Astaraei AR, Emami H and Mirzapour MH. 2012. Effects of nano iron oxide powder and urban solid waste compost coated sulfur on sunflower yield and yield components in saline-sodic soil. Environmental Sciences, 9 (3): 111-118.
Gupta UC and Solanki H. 2013. Impact of boron deficiency on plant growth. Intenational Journal of Bioassays, 2:1048-1050.
Hergert GW. 2010. Sugar Beet Fertilization. Sugar Tech, 12: 256-266.
Hoffmann CM. 2011. Root quakity of Sugar beet. Sugar Tech, 12(3-4): 276-287.
Hoffmann CM and Märländer B. 2005. Composition of harmful nitrogen in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)—amino acids, betaine, nitrate— as affected by genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 22: 255–265.
Jakienė E, Spruogis V, Romaneckas K, Dautartė A and Avižienytė D. 2015. The bio-organic nano fertilizer improves sugar beet photosynthesis process and productivity. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 102: 141–146.
Janmohammadi M, Amanzadeh T, Sabaghnia N and Dashti S. 2016. Impact of foliar application of nano micronutrient fertilizers and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the growth and yield components of barley under supplemental irrigation. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 107: 265-276.
Jokar L, Ronaghi A, Karimian N and Ghasemi-Fasaei R. 2015. Effects of different Fe levels from Fe-nano-chelate and Fe-EDDHA sources on growth and some nutrients concentrations in cowpea in a calcareous soil. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture Soilless Culture Research Center,
6 (2): 9-19.
Jozi M and Zare Abyaneh H. 2016. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and deficit irrigation on quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet. Journal of Suger Beet, 31 (2): 141-156.
Kaffka SR and Grantz DA. 2014. Sugar Crops. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 5: 240-260.
Kamaraki H and Galavi M. 2012. Evaluation of foliar Fe, Zn and B micronutrients application on quantitative and qualitative traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Ageroecology, 4(3): 201-206. (In Persian).
Khorramdel S, Eskandari Nasrabadi S and Mahmoodi G. 2015. Evaluation of mother corm weights and foliar fertilizer levels on saffron (Crocus sativus L.) growth and yield components. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 2: 9–14.
Kiymaz S and Ertek A. 2015. Yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different water and nitrogen levels under the climatic conditions of Kırsehir, Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 158: 156–165.
Liu R and Lal R. 2015. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the total environment, 514: 131-139. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(2): 17-32. (In Persian).
Mahdavi H, Maleki Farahani S, Chegini MA and Besharati H. 2016. Effect of seed coating and pelleting with plant growth promoting rihzobacteria on germination and seedling growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Journal of Sugar Beet, 32(1): 63-74. 
Mahmoodi Sourestani M, Moghadam E and Farrokhian Firoozi A. 2016. The effect of foliar application of iron on some biochemical and photosynthetic characteristics of Holy basil (Ocimum sanctum). Iranian Journal of Horticulture Science, 47(3): 543-552. (In Persian).
Malnou CS, Jaggard KW and Sparkes DL. 2008. Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. European Journal of Agronomy, 28: 47–56.
Maslaris N, Tsialtas IT and Ouzounidis T. 2010. Soil factors affecting yield, quality, and response to nitrogen of sugar beets grown on light-textured soils in Northern Greece. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 41: 1551–1564.
Monica RC and Cremonini R. 2009. Nanoparticles and higher plants. Caryologia, 62: 161–165.
Morales F, Belkhodja R, Goulas Y, Abadía J and Moya I. 1999. Remote and near-contact chlorophyll fluorescence during photosynthetic induction in iron-deficient sugar beet leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 69: 170–178.
Noshad H and Khayamim S. 2017. Effect of soil nitrogen on some physiological characteristics and quality of sugar beet. The University of Tehran's Scientific Journals Database. 48(1): 11-24. (In Persian).
Peyvandi M, Parande H and Mirza M. 2011. Comparison of Nano Fe Chelate with Fe Chelate Effect on Growth Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes Activity of Ocimum Basilicum. New Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Journal, 1(4): 89-98.
Piromyou P, Noisangiam R, Uchiyama H, Tittabutr P, Boonkerd N and Teaumroong N. 2013. Indigenous Microbial Community Structure in Rhizosphere of Chinese Kale as Affected by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculation. Pedosphere, 23: 577–592.
Pirzad A, Mazlomi M, Saadat B and Sedghi M. 2015. Impact of Foliar Application of Nano-Iron on yield of Fe Use Efficiency in Sugar beet. Research in Crop Ecosystem, 1(1): 23-33.
Reinefeld E, Emmerich B, Baumgarten G, Winner C and Beiss U. 1974. Zur voraussage des melassezuckers aus rubenanalysen. Zucker, 27: 2-15.
Rezaei- Chiyaneh E. 2016. Intercropping of Flax Seed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Under Foliar Application of Iron Nano Chelated and Zinc. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26(1): 39-56. (In Persian).
Sheykhbaglou R, Sedghi M, Tajbakhsh Shishevan M and Sharifi RS. 2010. Effects of Nano-Iron Oxide Particles on Agronomic Traits of Soybean. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2: 112–113.
Subramanian KS, Manikandan A, Thirunavukkarasu M and Rahale CS. 2015. Nano-fertilizers for balanced crop nutrition, in: Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture. pp. 69–80.
Subramanian KS and Thirunavukkarasu M. 2017. Nano-fertilizers and Nutrient Transformations in Soil. Nanoscience and Plant–Soil Systems, 48: 305-318.
Tsiltas JT and Maslaris N. 2013. Nitrogen effects on yield, quality and K/Na selectivity of sugar beets grown on clays under semi-arid, irrigated conditions. International Journal of Plant Production, 7 (3): 355-371.
Yousefzadeh S and Sabaghnia N. 2016. Nano-iron fertilizer effects on some plant traits of dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) under different sowing densities. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 107: 429-437.
Zahedifar M and Najafian S. 2017. Ocimum basilicum L. growth and nutrient status as influenced by biochar and potassium-nano chelate fertilizers. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63: 638–650.