بررسی اثر سوپرنانوجاذب ASN-320 روی رشد کلزا در سطوح مختلف آبیاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 گروه مهندسی فضای سبز، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

3 گروه عاوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

یکی از مهم­ترین مشکلات در تولید محصولات کشاورزی، کمبود آب است. با کاربرد برخی مواد جاذب رطوبت می­توان از بارندگی­های پراکنده استفاده و موجب کاهش تبخیر آب از خاک، حفظ و ذخیره آب در خاک شد. این پژوهش به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار بصورت گلخانه­ای اجرا شد. در این تحقیق چهار سطح سوپرنانوجاذب ASN-320 شامل صفر (شاهد)، 2/0 درصد سوپرنانوجاذب (2 گرم سوپرنانوجاذب به ازای هر کیلوگرم خاک)، 4/0 درصد سوپرنانوجاذب (4 گرم سوپرنانوجاذب به ازای هر کیلوگرم خاک)، 6/0 درصد سوپرنانوجاذب (6 گرم سوپرنانوجاذب به ازای هر کیلوگرم خاک) و سه سطح آبیاری، FC85/0- I1: FC، FC65/0-FC85/0 I2:، FC5/0-FC65/0 I3:،  روی برخی صفات فیزیولوژیک و مورفولوژیک کلزا مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. این صفات، به طور معنی­داری تحت تاثیر سوپرنانوجاذب قرار گرفتند. بیش­ترین قطر ساقه، ارتفاع بوته، شاخص کلروفیل، تعداد غلاف، تعداد خورجین، وزن تر و خشک بخش هوایی و وزن هزار دانه در بالاترین سطح سوپرنانوجاذب (6 گرم سوپرنانوجاذب به ازای هر کیلوگرم خاک) حاصل شد. با توجه به نتایج به­دست آمده سوپرنانوجاذب موجب کاهش خسارات وارد شده در تنش خشکی گردید. بیش­ترین میزان وزن تر و خشک بخش هوایی گیاه با استفاده از سوپرنانوجاذب نشان دهنده نقش تأثیر گذار آن در شرایط تنش خشکی است. در این پژوهش مشخص گردید که هر چند که با کاهش مقدار آب، شاخص­های رشدی کاهش یافت، ولی با اضافه نمودن سوپرنانوجاذب میزان کاهش کمتر از عدم کاربرد سوپرنانوجاذب بود.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of ASN-320 Super Nano-absorbent on the Growth of Rapeseed at Different Irrigation Levels

نویسندگان [English]

  • Davoud Zarehaghi 1
  • Mehdi Nasiri 1
  • Reza Hassanpour 1
  • Ahmad Hami 2
  • Soheil Salimi 3
  • Soraya Alipour Jedarifar 3
چکیده [English]

     One of the most important problems in agricultural production is water shortage. Application of absorbent materials can help usage of sporadic rain fall and cause more maintenance of water storage. This research was conducted as factorial based on a randomized complete design with three replication and four levelssuper nano-absorbent consisted of 0 (control), 0.2% super nano-absorbent (2 gram super nano-absorbent per kg of soil), 0.4% super nano-absorbent (4 g super nano-absorbent per kg of soil), 0.6% super nano-absorbent (6 gram super nano-absorbent per kg of soil) and three levels of irrigation; I1: FC- 0.85FC, I2: 0.85FC- 0.65FC, I3: 0.65FC- 0. 5 FC, was evaluated on the some physiological and morphological traits of rapeseed. These traits were affected significantly by super nano-absorbent. The highest stem diameter, plant height, chlorophyll index, number of pods and panicles, fresh and dry weight of the aerial part and 1000-seed weight were obtained with the use of more super nano-absorbent. (6 g super nano-adsorbent per kg of soil). Depending on the results, super nano-absorbent reduced damages caused by drought stress. The highest fresh and dry weights of the aerial parts of the plant using super nano-absorbent showed its role in drought stress conditions. In this study, it was found that although the growth indices decreased by reducing the amount of water, but by adding super nano-absorbent, the reduction was less than the non-use of super-adsorbent.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chlorophyll Index
  • Drought Stress
  • Rapeseed
  • Super Nano-Absorbent
  • Physiological Traits
Abheri A, Azizi E and Hares Abadi B. 2017. Effect of super adsorbent on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress conditions of the end of season. Journal of Crop Production, 10(1):191-202. (In Persian).
Afazati M, Irandost M, and Rezaei Estakhroeih A. 2015. Effect of superabsorbent polymer on growth and yield of greenhouse cucumber under irrigated conditions. Water and Irrigation Management, 5(2): 203-214. (In Persian).
Ahmadi K, Golizadeh H, Ebadzadeh H, Hoseinpur R, Hatami F, Fazli B, Kazemian A and Rafiee M. 2015. Agricultural statistics, Volume I: crops. Ministry of Jihade-Agriculture. Pp. 169. (In Persian).
Bahreininejad B, Razmjoo J and Mirza M. 2013. Influence of water stress on morpho-physiological and phytochemical traits in Thymus daenensis. International Journal of Plant Production. 7:151-166.
Black GR and Hartge KH, 1986. Bulk density determination. Pp: 363-373. In: Klute A (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA and SSSA, Madison. WI.
Bredemeier C. 2005. Laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence sensing as a tool for site-specific nitrogen fertilizer evaluation under controlled environmental and field conditions in wheat and maize. PhD. Thesis. Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Chehel Gordi  A, Saffari M and Abboshahi R. 2015. Effect of super absorbent polymer, potassium sulphate and farmyard manure on physiological characteristics of millet (Setaria italica) optimum irrigation and drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Production, 7(2): 43-60. (In Persian).
Dawlatzai AS, Jayanthi R and Atiq Abdiani S. 2017. Efficacy of graded doses of Pusa Hydrogel on growth and quality of coleus (Coleus blumei L.) under polyhouse condition. International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science, 4(4): 33-38.
Din J, Khan SU, Ali I, and Gurmani AR. 2011. Physiological and agronomic response of canola varieties to drought stress. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 1: 78-82.
Duan B, Yang Y, Lu Y, Korpelainen H, Berninger F and Li C. 2007. Interactions between water deficit, ABA, and provenances in Picea asperata. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58(11): 3025-3036.
Earl HJ and Davis RF. 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal, 95: 688-696.
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi M, Fujita D and Basra SMA. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29: 185-212.
Fathi B, Reezi S, Rouhi V and Ghobadinia M. 2017. Effect of different levels of superabsorbent and vermicompost on qualitative and quantitative traits of gazania (Gazania hybrida) in green roof condition. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science. 48(2): 423-429. (In Persian).
Fazeli Rostampour M, Yarnia M, Rahimzadeh Khoee F, Seghatoleslami MJ and Moosavi GR. 2013. Physiological response of forage sorghum to polymer under water deficit conditions. Agronomy Journal, 105(4): 951-959.
Gaturuku JK, Isutsa DK and Aguyoh JN. 2012. Irrigation rate and mulch type significantly affect some physiological processes of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims.) under drought stress. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 2(1): 46-52.
Gee GW and Bauder JW. 1986. Particle size analysis. Pp. 383-411. In: Klute A (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA and SSSA, Madison. WI.
Han Y, Yu X, Yang P, Li B and Wang C. 2012. Dynamic on water diffusivity of soil with superabsorbent polymer application. Environ Earth Science, 69: 289-296.
Hayatu M and Mukhtar FB. 2010. Physiological responses of some drought resistant cowpea genotypes (Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP) to water stress. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(2): 69-75.
Hemmatinafar K and MM Rahimi, 2018. Effect of Different Superabsorbent Levels on Water Use Efficiency and Quantitative Sorghum Traits in Different Irrigation Regimes. Journal of Plant Growth and Aquaculture, 9(31): 32-41. (In Persian).
Huttermann A, Reise K and Zommorodi M. 1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedling subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research Journal, 50: 295-304.
Islam Robiul M, Shahidul Alam AM, Egrinya Eneji A, Ren C, Song W and Hu Y. (2011). Evaluation of a water-saving superabsorbent polymer for forage oat (Avena sativa L.) production in arid regions of northern China. Food, Agriculture & Environment, 9(2): 514-518.
Jackson ML. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Pp. 480. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff.
Jalili S, Hadi M and Majnoon Heris A. 2017. Effect of superabsorbent polymer using on irrigated and rainfed wheat yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(4): 923-931. (In Persian).
Jamshidi N, Shirani rad AH, Takht chin F, Nazeri P and Ghafari M. 2012. Evaluation of Rapeseed Genotypes under Drought Stress Condition. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 6(3): 323-338.
Jazi Nejad E and Mortezaei Nejad F. 2017. Effects of Drought Stress on Morphological and Physiological Indices of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) for introduction in urban green space. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology, 6(21): 279-290. (In Persian).
Kage H, Kochler M and Stutzel H. 2004. Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress conditions: measurement and simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 20: 379-394.
Kaykhaee F and Ganji Khorramdel N. 2016. Effect of low irrigation with two strip and strip methods on yield and water use efficiency of wheat. Water Research in Agriculture, 30(1): 1-11.
Keshavarz L and Farahbakhsh H. 2012. Effect of superabsorbent on physio-morphological traits and forage yield of millet (Pennisetum Amercanum L.) under different irrigation treatments. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 2(3): 149-156.
Khadem SA, Galavi M, Ramrodi M, Mousavi SR, Rousta RJ and Rezvani-Moghadam P. 2010. Effect of animal manure and superabsorbent polymer on corn leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability and leaf chlorophyll content under dry condition. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(8): 642-647.
Khaleghi E and Moallemi N. 2018. Effect of Superabsorbent Polymers on some Morphological Characteristics of Olive Cultivars ‘Baghmalek’ and ‘Dezphol’ under Water Deficit. Journal of Horticultural Science, 31(4): 671-682.
Liu F, Jensen CR and Andersen MN. 2004. Drought stress effect on carbohydrate concentration in soybean leaves and pods during early reproductive development: its implication in altering pod set. Field Crops Research, 86: 1-13.
Ma Q, Niknam SR and Turner DW. 2006. Responses of osmotic adjustment and seed yield of Brassica napus and B. juncea to soil water deficit at different growth stages. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57(2): 221-226.
Malekian A, Valizadeh E, Dastoori M, Samadi S and Bayat V. 2012. Soil water retention and maize (Zea mays L.) growth as affected by different amounts of pumice. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3): 450-454.
Moslemi Z, Habibi D,  Asgharzadeh A, Ardakani MR, Mohammadi A and Sakari A. 2011. Effects of super absorbent polymer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yield and yield components of maize under drought stress and normal conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 4471-4476.
Nasiri M. 2015. Pumice mulch and deficit irrigation effects on water relations, forage corn yield, and weeds control. MSc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz.
Nazarli H, Zardashti MR, Darvishzadeh R, Najafi S. 2010. The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits of sunflower under greenhouse condition. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2: 53-58.
Nelson DW and Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pp: 961-1010. In: Page AL (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd ed. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
Olsen SR and Sommers LE. 1982. Chemical and microbiological properties. Pp. 403–430. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Phosphorus. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Parry MAJ, Andraloje PJ, Khan S, Lea PJ and Keys AJ. 2002. Rubisco activity: Effects of drought stress. Annals of Botany, 89: 833-839.
Rezai Chiane E, Zehtab Salmasi S, Ghasemi Golezani K and Delazar A. 2013. Physiological reactions of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) to water limtation. Journal of Agroecology, 4: 347-355. (In Persian).
Schlemmer MR, Francis DD, Shanahan JF and Schepers JS. 2005. Remotely measuring chlorophyll content in corn leaves with differing nitrogen levels and relative water content. Agronomy Journal, 97(1): 106-112.
Sendur Kumaran S, Natarajan S, Muthvel I and Sathiayamurthy VA. 2001. Efficacy of graded doses of polymers on processing quality of tomato cv. CO3. The Madras Agricultural Journal, 88:298-299.
Shirani Rad AH, Taherkhani T, Moradi Akhdam A, Nazari GA and Eskandari K. 2011. Effect of Nitrogen and Zeolite on Agronomic Traits of Rapeseed under Drought Stress Conditions. Ecophysiology of Crops, 3(2): 125-135. (In Persian).
Sivapalan S. 2006. Benefits of treating a sandy soil with a crosslinked-type polyacrylamide. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46: 579-584.
Taiz L and Zeiger E. 2006. Plant physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Tarumingkeng RC and Coto Z. 2003. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of soybean. Science Philosopy PPs 702, Term paper, Graduate School, Borgor Agricultural University (Institute Ppertanian Bogor).
Tavakoli AR. 2013. Deficit irrigation and supplemental irrigation management for rainfed and irrigated wheat at Selseleh region. Journal of Water Research in Agricultur, 27(4): 589-600. (In Persian).
Yang C, Gan Y, Harker KN, Kutcher HR, Gulden R, Irvine B and May WE. 2014. Up to 32 % yield increase with optimized spatial patterns of canola plant establishment in western Canada. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(4): 793-801.
Yazdani F, Allahdadi I and Akbari GA. 2007. Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of Soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pakistan Biological Sciences, 10: 4190-4196.
Zangoee Nasab Sh, Emami, H, Astaraei A and Yari A. 2012. Effects of different amounts of super absorbent and irrigation interval on some soil physical properties and Atriplex growth indices. Journal of Water Science in Agriculture (formerly Soil and Water Sciences), 26(2): 211- 223. (In Persian).
Zarehaghi D, Neyshabouri MR, Sadeghzadeh Reyhan MI and Hassanpour R. 2015. Effect of pumice on water holding capacity in soil, growth and yield of spring Safflower in dry land conditions. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 5(3): 191-204. (In Persian).